Subjectivist perfectionism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper critically discusses a neglected view in contemporary political theory. Subjectivist perfectionism combines a fully subjectivist understanding of the human good with the perfectionist claim that it is permissible for the state to promote the good, actively and intentionally, of its members. The paper clarifies the subjectivism in question and shows how it can inform state efforts to promote the good. The paper also explains how more traditional perfectionist views, which are informed by an objective account of the human good, can learn from it. The paper concludes by arguing that proponents of subjectivist perfectionism are particularly well positioned to respond to and rebut Michael Kramer's central objection to mainstream perfectionist views in his provocative book Liberalism with Excellence. This is the charge that political perfectionists manifest an objectionable busybody mentality, one that is eschewed by his own favored form of justice-based perfectionism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-131
Number of pages23
JournalAmerican Journal of Jurisprudence
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

mentality
political theory
liberalism
justice

Keywords

  • Liberalism
  • Matthew Kramer
  • Perfectionism
  • Subjectivism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Subjectivist perfectionism. / Wall, Steven P.

In: American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 109-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{02202946544846489df96d23ee8508c1,
title = "Subjectivist perfectionism",
abstract = "This paper critically discusses a neglected view in contemporary political theory. Subjectivist perfectionism combines a fully subjectivist understanding of the human good with the perfectionist claim that it is permissible for the state to promote the good, actively and intentionally, of its members. The paper clarifies the subjectivism in question and shows how it can inform state efforts to promote the good. The paper also explains how more traditional perfectionist views, which are informed by an objective account of the human good, can learn from it. The paper concludes by arguing that proponents of subjectivist perfectionism are particularly well positioned to respond to and rebut Michael Kramer's central objection to mainstream perfectionist views in his provocative book Liberalism with Excellence. This is the charge that political perfectionists manifest an objectionable busybody mentality, one that is eschewed by his own favored form of justice-based perfectionism.",
keywords = "Liberalism, Matthew Kramer, Perfectionism, Subjectivism",
author = "Wall, {Steven P}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/AJJ/AUY009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "109--131",
journal = "American Journal of Jurisprudence",
issn = "0065-8995",
publisher = "University of Notre Dame, Law School",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjectivist perfectionism

AU - Wall, Steven P

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This paper critically discusses a neglected view in contemporary political theory. Subjectivist perfectionism combines a fully subjectivist understanding of the human good with the perfectionist claim that it is permissible for the state to promote the good, actively and intentionally, of its members. The paper clarifies the subjectivism in question and shows how it can inform state efforts to promote the good. The paper also explains how more traditional perfectionist views, which are informed by an objective account of the human good, can learn from it. The paper concludes by arguing that proponents of subjectivist perfectionism are particularly well positioned to respond to and rebut Michael Kramer's central objection to mainstream perfectionist views in his provocative book Liberalism with Excellence. This is the charge that political perfectionists manifest an objectionable busybody mentality, one that is eschewed by his own favored form of justice-based perfectionism.

AB - This paper critically discusses a neglected view in contemporary political theory. Subjectivist perfectionism combines a fully subjectivist understanding of the human good with the perfectionist claim that it is permissible for the state to promote the good, actively and intentionally, of its members. The paper clarifies the subjectivism in question and shows how it can inform state efforts to promote the good. The paper also explains how more traditional perfectionist views, which are informed by an objective account of the human good, can learn from it. The paper concludes by arguing that proponents of subjectivist perfectionism are particularly well positioned to respond to and rebut Michael Kramer's central objection to mainstream perfectionist views in his provocative book Liberalism with Excellence. This is the charge that political perfectionists manifest an objectionable busybody mentality, one that is eschewed by his own favored form of justice-based perfectionism.

KW - Liberalism

KW - Matthew Kramer

KW - Perfectionism

KW - Subjectivism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051841691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051841691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/AJJ/AUY009

DO - 10.1093/AJJ/AUY009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051841691

VL - 63

SP - 109

EP - 131

JO - American Journal of Jurisprudence

JF - American Journal of Jurisprudence

SN - 0065-8995

IS - 1

ER -