Subjectivity uncertainty theory of objectification: Compensating for uncertainty about how to positively relate to others by downplaying their subjective attributes

Mark J. Landau, Daniel L Sullivan, Lucas A. Keefer, Zachary K. Rothschild, Mark R. Osman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why do people sometimes view others as objects rather than complete persons? We propose that when people desire successful interactions with others, yet feel uncertain about their ability to navigate others' subjectivity, they downplay others' subjective attributes, focusing instead on their concrete attributes. This account suggests that objectification represents a response to uncertainty about one's ability to successfully interact with others distinct from: instrumentalizing others in response to power; dehumanizing others in response to threat; and simplifying others in response to general uncertainty. Supporting this account: When uncertainty about navigating women's subjectivity was salient, men showed increased sexual objectification to the extent that they desired successful interactions with women (Study 1) and were primed to view such interactions as self-esteem relevant (Study 2). In a workplace scenario, participants made uncertain about their managerial ability felt less confident about their ability to navigate employees' subjectivity and, consequently, role-objectified employees (Study 3).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1234-1246
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

objectification
Aptitude
Uncertainty
subjectivity
uncertainty
ability
interaction
employee
women's studies
Self Concept
Workplace
self-esteem
workplace
threat
scenario
human being

Keywords

  • Attitude
  • Interpersonal relation
  • Motivation/goal setting
  • Relationship cognition
  • Self-worth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Subjectivity uncertainty theory of objectification : Compensating for uncertainty about how to positively relate to others by downplaying their subjective attributes. / Landau, Mark J.; Sullivan, Daniel L; Keefer, Lucas A.; Rothschild, Zachary K.; Osman, Mark R.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 6, 11.2012, p. 1234-1246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a560492ecbf4052a94933adf8670d57,
title = "Subjectivity uncertainty theory of objectification: Compensating for uncertainty about how to positively relate to others by downplaying their subjective attributes",
abstract = "Why do people sometimes view others as objects rather than complete persons? We propose that when people desire successful interactions with others, yet feel uncertain about their ability to navigate others' subjectivity, they downplay others' subjective attributes, focusing instead on their concrete attributes. This account suggests that objectification represents a response to uncertainty about one's ability to successfully interact with others distinct from: instrumentalizing others in response to power; dehumanizing others in response to threat; and simplifying others in response to general uncertainty. Supporting this account: When uncertainty about navigating women's subjectivity was salient, men showed increased sexual objectification to the extent that they desired successful interactions with women (Study 1) and were primed to view such interactions as self-esteem relevant (Study 2). In a workplace scenario, participants made uncertain about their managerial ability felt less confident about their ability to navigate employees' subjectivity and, consequently, role-objectified employees (Study 3).",
keywords = "Attitude, Interpersonal relation, Motivation/goal setting, Relationship cognition, Self-worth",
author = "Landau, {Mark J.} and Sullivan, {Daniel L} and Keefer, {Lucas A.} and Rothschild, {Zachary K.} and Osman, {Mark R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1234--1246",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjectivity uncertainty theory of objectification

T2 - Compensating for uncertainty about how to positively relate to others by downplaying their subjective attributes

AU - Landau, Mark J.

AU - Sullivan, Daniel L

AU - Keefer, Lucas A.

AU - Rothschild, Zachary K.

AU - Osman, Mark R.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Why do people sometimes view others as objects rather than complete persons? We propose that when people desire successful interactions with others, yet feel uncertain about their ability to navigate others' subjectivity, they downplay others' subjective attributes, focusing instead on their concrete attributes. This account suggests that objectification represents a response to uncertainty about one's ability to successfully interact with others distinct from: instrumentalizing others in response to power; dehumanizing others in response to threat; and simplifying others in response to general uncertainty. Supporting this account: When uncertainty about navigating women's subjectivity was salient, men showed increased sexual objectification to the extent that they desired successful interactions with women (Study 1) and were primed to view such interactions as self-esteem relevant (Study 2). In a workplace scenario, participants made uncertain about their managerial ability felt less confident about their ability to navigate employees' subjectivity and, consequently, role-objectified employees (Study 3).

AB - Why do people sometimes view others as objects rather than complete persons? We propose that when people desire successful interactions with others, yet feel uncertain about their ability to navigate others' subjectivity, they downplay others' subjective attributes, focusing instead on their concrete attributes. This account suggests that objectification represents a response to uncertainty about one's ability to successfully interact with others distinct from: instrumentalizing others in response to power; dehumanizing others in response to threat; and simplifying others in response to general uncertainty. Supporting this account: When uncertainty about navigating women's subjectivity was salient, men showed increased sexual objectification to the extent that they desired successful interactions with women (Study 1) and were primed to view such interactions as self-esteem relevant (Study 2). In a workplace scenario, participants made uncertain about their managerial ability felt less confident about their ability to navigate employees' subjectivity and, consequently, role-objectified employees (Study 3).

KW - Attitude

KW - Interpersonal relation

KW - Motivation/goal setting

KW - Relationship cognition

KW - Self-worth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865653112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865653112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865653112

VL - 48

SP - 1234

EP - 1246

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 6

ER -