Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration

Richard Thomas Snodgrass; Karen Shannon

doi:10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration

Richard Thomas Snodgrass, Karen Shannon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present a model of tool integration intermediate to the monolithic approach and the toolkit approach. Tools are developed separately, as in the toolkit approach, and then combined to form a new tool. The Interface Description Language (IDL), a notation for describing the characteristics of data structures passed among collections of cooperating processes, is extended to specify tight integration as exhibited in the monolithic approach. A composite tool can be formed by grouping a collection of existing tools linked through connections. Representations for connections that differ in flexibility and efficiency can be specified. Certain portions of the tool can be generated automatically from its specification.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Advanced Programming Environments - Proceedings of an International Workshop
Publisher	Springer Verlag
Pages	290-313
Number of pages	24
Volume	244 LNCS
ISBN (Print)	9783540171898
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104
State	Published - Jan 1 1986
Externally published	Yes
Event	International Workshop on Advanced Programming Environments, 1986 - Trondheim, Norway Duration: Jun 16 1986 → Jun 18 1986

Publication series

Name	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume	244 LNCS
ISSN (Print)	0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)	1611-3349

Other

Other	International Workshop on Advanced Programming Environments, 1986
Country/Territory	Norway
City	Trondheim
Period	6/16/86 → 6/18/86

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Theoretical Computer Science
Computer Science(all)

Access to Document

10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

Cite this

Snodgrass, R. T., & Shannon, K. (1986). Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration. In Advanced Programming Environments - Proceedings of an International Workshop (Vol. 244 LNCS, pp. 290-313). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 244 LNCS). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration. / Snodgrass, Richard Thomas; Shannon, Karen.

Advanced Programming Environments - Proceedings of an International Workshop. Vol. 244 LNCS Springer Verlag, 1986. p. 290-313 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 244 LNCS).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Snodgrass, RT & Shannon, K 1986, Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration. in Advanced Programming Environments - Proceedings of an International Workshop. vol. 244 LNCS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 244 LNCS, Springer Verlag, pp. 290-313, International Workshop on Advanced Programming Environments, 1986, Trondheim, Norway, 6/16/86. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

Snodgrass RT, Shannon K. Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration. In Advanced Programming Environments - Proceedings of an International Workshop. Vol. 244 LNCS. Springer Verlag. 1986. p. 290-313. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

@inproceedings{224a89d0799344069c911e2fc77755c6,

title = "Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration",

abstract = "We present a model of tool integration intermediate to the monolithic approach and the toolkit approach. Tools are developed separately, as in the toolkit approach, and then combined to form a new tool. The Interface Description Language (IDL), a notation for describing the characteristics of data structures passed among collections of cooperating processes, is extended to specify tight integration as exhibited in the monolithic approach. A composite tool can be formed by grouping a collection of existing tools linked through connections. Representations for connections that differ in flexibility and efficiency can be specified. Certain portions of the tool can be generated automatically from its specification.",

author = "Snodgrass, {Richard Thomas} and Karen Shannon",

year = "1986",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9783540171898",

volume = "244 LNCS",

series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

pages = "290--313",

booktitle = "Advanced Programming Environments - Proceedings of an International Workshop",

address = "Germany",

note = "International Workshop on Advanced Programming Environments, 1986 ; Conference date: 16-06-1986 Through 18-06-1986",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration

AU - Snodgrass, Richard Thomas

AU - Shannon, Karen

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - We present a model of tool integration intermediate to the monolithic approach and the toolkit approach. Tools are developed separately, as in the toolkit approach, and then combined to form a new tool. The Interface Description Language (IDL), a notation for describing the characteristics of data structures passed among collections of cooperating processes, is extended to specify tight integration as exhibited in the monolithic approach. A composite tool can be formed by grouping a collection of existing tools linked through connections. Representations for connections that differ in flexibility and efficiency can be specified. Certain portions of the tool can be generated automatically from its specification.

AB - We present a model of tool integration intermediate to the monolithic approach and the toolkit approach. Tools are developed separately, as in the toolkit approach, and then combined to form a new tool. The Interface Description Language (IDL), a notation for describing the characteristics of data structures passed among collections of cooperating processes, is extended to specify tight integration as exhibited in the monolithic approach. A composite tool can be formed by grouping a collection of existing tools linked through connections. Representations for connections that differ in flexibility and efficiency can be specified. Certain portions of the tool can be generated automatically from its specification.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034617185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034617185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

DO - 10.1007/3-540-17189-4_104

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85034617185

SN - 9783540171898

VL - 244 LNCS

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 290

EP - 313

BT - Advanced Programming Environments - Proceedings of an International Workshop

PB - Springer Verlag

T2 - International Workshop on Advanced Programming Environments, 1986

Y2 - 16 June 1986 through 18 June 1986

ER -

Supporting flexible and efficient tool integration

Abstract

Publication series

Other

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this