Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials

Katherine L. McNeill, David J. Lizotte, Joseph Krajcik, Ronald W Marx

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

320 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing students with continuous written instructional support or fading written instructional support (scaffolds) better prepares students to construct scientific explanations when they are no longer provided with support. This article investigated the influence of scaffolding on 331 seventh-grade students' writing of scientific explanations during an 8-week, project-based chemistry unit in which the construction of scientific explanations is a key learning goal. The unit makes an instructional model for explanation explicit to students through a focal lesson and reinforces that model through subsequent written support for each investigation. Students received 1 of 2 treatments in terms of the type of written support: continuous, involving detailed support for every investigation, or faded, involving less support over time. The analyses showed significant learning gains for students for all components of scientific explanation (i.e., claim, evidence, and reasoning). However, on posttest items lacking scaffolds, the faded group gave stronger explanations in terms of their reasoning compared to the continuous group. Fading written scaffolds better equipped students to write explanations when they were not provided with support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-191
Number of pages39
JournalJournal of the Learning Sciences
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Students
student
Learning
Educational Models
learning
chemistry
Group
evidence
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. / McNeill, Katherine L.; Lizotte, David J.; Krajcik, Joseph; Marx, Ronald W.

In: Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2006, p. 153-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McNeill, Katherine L. ; Lizotte, David J. ; Krajcik, Joseph ; Marx, Ronald W. / Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. In: Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 153-191.
@article{56ffdebcccc046539365c83b3f201b24,
title = "Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing students with continuous written instructional support or fading written instructional support (scaffolds) better prepares students to construct scientific explanations when they are no longer provided with support. This article investigated the influence of scaffolding on 331 seventh-grade students' writing of scientific explanations during an 8-week, project-based chemistry unit in which the construction of scientific explanations is a key learning goal. The unit makes an instructional model for explanation explicit to students through a focal lesson and reinforces that model through subsequent written support for each investigation. Students received 1 of 2 treatments in terms of the type of written support: continuous, involving detailed support for every investigation, or faded, involving less support over time. The analyses showed significant learning gains for students for all components of scientific explanation (i.e., claim, evidence, and reasoning). However, on posttest items lacking scaffolds, the faded group gave stronger explanations in terms of their reasoning compared to the continuous group. Fading written scaffolds better equipped students to write explanations when they were not provided with support.",
author = "McNeill, {Katherine L.} and Lizotte, {David J.} and Joseph Krajcik and Marx, {Ronald W}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "153--191",
journal = "Journal of the Learning Sciences",
issn = "1050-8406",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials

AU - McNeill, Katherine L.

AU - Lizotte, David J.

AU - Krajcik, Joseph

AU - Marx, Ronald W

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing students with continuous written instructional support or fading written instructional support (scaffolds) better prepares students to construct scientific explanations when they are no longer provided with support. This article investigated the influence of scaffolding on 331 seventh-grade students' writing of scientific explanations during an 8-week, project-based chemistry unit in which the construction of scientific explanations is a key learning goal. The unit makes an instructional model for explanation explicit to students through a focal lesson and reinforces that model through subsequent written support for each investigation. Students received 1 of 2 treatments in terms of the type of written support: continuous, involving detailed support for every investigation, or faded, involving less support over time. The analyses showed significant learning gains for students for all components of scientific explanation (i.e., claim, evidence, and reasoning). However, on posttest items lacking scaffolds, the faded group gave stronger explanations in terms of their reasoning compared to the continuous group. Fading written scaffolds better equipped students to write explanations when they were not provided with support.

AB - The purpose of this study was to determine whether providing students with continuous written instructional support or fading written instructional support (scaffolds) better prepares students to construct scientific explanations when they are no longer provided with support. This article investigated the influence of scaffolding on 331 seventh-grade students' writing of scientific explanations during an 8-week, project-based chemistry unit in which the construction of scientific explanations is a key learning goal. The unit makes an instructional model for explanation explicit to students through a focal lesson and reinforces that model through subsequent written support for each investigation. Students received 1 of 2 treatments in terms of the type of written support: continuous, involving detailed support for every investigation, or faded, involving less support over time. The analyses showed significant learning gains for students for all components of scientific explanation (i.e., claim, evidence, and reasoning). However, on posttest items lacking scaffolds, the faded group gave stronger explanations in terms of their reasoning compared to the continuous group. Fading written scaffolds better equipped students to write explanations when they were not provided with support.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645990367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645990367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1

DO - 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645990367

VL - 15

SP - 153

EP - 191

JO - Journal of the Learning Sciences

JF - Journal of the Learning Sciences

SN - 1050-8406

IS - 2

ER -