Supporting the academic mission in an era of constrained resources: Approaches at the University of Arizona College of Medicine

Keith A Joiner, Ann Libecap, Anne E Cress, Steve Wormsley, Patricia St. Germain, Robert Berg, Philip Malan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors describe initiatives at the University of Arizona College of Medicine to markedly expand faculty, build research along programmatic lines, and promote a new, highly integrated medical school curriculum. Accomplishing these goals in this era of declining resources is challenging. The authors describe their approaches and outcomes to date, derived from a solid theoretical framework in the management literature, to (1) support research faculty recruitment, emphasizing return on investment, by using net present value to guide formulation of recruitment packages, (2) stimulate efficiency and growth through incentive plans, by using utility theory to optimize incentive plan design, (3) distribute resources to support programmatic growth, by allocating research space and recruitment dollars to maximize joint hires between units with shared interests, and (4) distribute resources from central administration to encourage medical student teaching, by aligning state dollars to support a new integrated organ-system based-curriculum. Detailed measurement is followed by application of management principles, including mathematical modeling, to make projections based on the data collected. Although each of the initiatives was developed separately, they are linked functionally and financially, and they are predicated on explicitly identifying opportunity costs for all major decisions, to achieve efficiencies while supporting growth. The overall intent is to align institutional goals in education, research, and clinical care with incentives for unit heads and individual faculty to achieve those goals, and to create a clear line of sight between expectations and rewards. Implementation is occurring in a hypothesis-driven fashion, permitting testing and refinement of the strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)837-844
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume83
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Medicine
medicine
Motivation
incentive
Research
resources
Curriculum
dollar
Growth
central administration
Efficiency
utility theory
curriculum
efficiency
mathematical modeling
opportunity costs
Medical Schools
Medical Students
Reward
management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Supporting the academic mission in an era of constrained resources : Approaches at the University of Arizona College of Medicine. / Joiner, Keith A; Libecap, Ann; Cress, Anne E; Wormsley, Steve; St. Germain, Patricia; Berg, Robert; Malan, Philip.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 83, No. 9, 09.2008, p. 837-844.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joiner, Keith A ; Libecap, Ann ; Cress, Anne E ; Wormsley, Steve ; St. Germain, Patricia ; Berg, Robert ; Malan, Philip. / Supporting the academic mission in an era of constrained resources : Approaches at the University of Arizona College of Medicine. In: Academic Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 83, No. 9. pp. 837-844.
@article{77493daae22e4fb19b5e20461f6d9ee2,
title = "Supporting the academic mission in an era of constrained resources: Approaches at the University of Arizona College of Medicine",
abstract = "The authors describe initiatives at the University of Arizona College of Medicine to markedly expand faculty, build research along programmatic lines, and promote a new, highly integrated medical school curriculum. Accomplishing these goals in this era of declining resources is challenging. The authors describe their approaches and outcomes to date, derived from a solid theoretical framework in the management literature, to (1) support research faculty recruitment, emphasizing return on investment, by using net present value to guide formulation of recruitment packages, (2) stimulate efficiency and growth through incentive plans, by using utility theory to optimize incentive plan design, (3) distribute resources to support programmatic growth, by allocating research space and recruitment dollars to maximize joint hires between units with shared interests, and (4) distribute resources from central administration to encourage medical student teaching, by aligning state dollars to support a new integrated organ-system based-curriculum. Detailed measurement is followed by application of management principles, including mathematical modeling, to make projections based on the data collected. Although each of the initiatives was developed separately, they are linked functionally and financially, and they are predicated on explicitly identifying opportunity costs for all major decisions, to achieve efficiencies while supporting growth. The overall intent is to align institutional goals in education, research, and clinical care with incentives for unit heads and individual faculty to achieve those goals, and to create a clear line of sight between expectations and rewards. Implementation is occurring in a hypothesis-driven fashion, permitting testing and refinement of the strategies.",
author = "Joiner, {Keith A} and Ann Libecap and Cress, {Anne E} and Steve Wormsley and {St. Germain}, Patricia and Robert Berg and Philip Malan",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181d2b2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "837--844",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supporting the academic mission in an era of constrained resources

T2 - Approaches at the University of Arizona College of Medicine

AU - Joiner, Keith A

AU - Libecap, Ann

AU - Cress, Anne E

AU - Wormsley, Steve

AU - St. Germain, Patricia

AU - Berg, Robert

AU - Malan, Philip

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - The authors describe initiatives at the University of Arizona College of Medicine to markedly expand faculty, build research along programmatic lines, and promote a new, highly integrated medical school curriculum. Accomplishing these goals in this era of declining resources is challenging. The authors describe their approaches and outcomes to date, derived from a solid theoretical framework in the management literature, to (1) support research faculty recruitment, emphasizing return on investment, by using net present value to guide formulation of recruitment packages, (2) stimulate efficiency and growth through incentive plans, by using utility theory to optimize incentive plan design, (3) distribute resources to support programmatic growth, by allocating research space and recruitment dollars to maximize joint hires between units with shared interests, and (4) distribute resources from central administration to encourage medical student teaching, by aligning state dollars to support a new integrated organ-system based-curriculum. Detailed measurement is followed by application of management principles, including mathematical modeling, to make projections based on the data collected. Although each of the initiatives was developed separately, they are linked functionally and financially, and they are predicated on explicitly identifying opportunity costs for all major decisions, to achieve efficiencies while supporting growth. The overall intent is to align institutional goals in education, research, and clinical care with incentives for unit heads and individual faculty to achieve those goals, and to create a clear line of sight between expectations and rewards. Implementation is occurring in a hypothesis-driven fashion, permitting testing and refinement of the strategies.

AB - The authors describe initiatives at the University of Arizona College of Medicine to markedly expand faculty, build research along programmatic lines, and promote a new, highly integrated medical school curriculum. Accomplishing these goals in this era of declining resources is challenging. The authors describe their approaches and outcomes to date, derived from a solid theoretical framework in the management literature, to (1) support research faculty recruitment, emphasizing return on investment, by using net present value to guide formulation of recruitment packages, (2) stimulate efficiency and growth through incentive plans, by using utility theory to optimize incentive plan design, (3) distribute resources to support programmatic growth, by allocating research space and recruitment dollars to maximize joint hires between units with shared interests, and (4) distribute resources from central administration to encourage medical student teaching, by aligning state dollars to support a new integrated organ-system based-curriculum. Detailed measurement is followed by application of management principles, including mathematical modeling, to make projections based on the data collected. Although each of the initiatives was developed separately, they are linked functionally and financially, and they are predicated on explicitly identifying opportunity costs for all major decisions, to achieve efficiencies while supporting growth. The overall intent is to align institutional goals in education, research, and clinical care with incentives for unit heads and individual faculty to achieve those goals, and to create a clear line of sight between expectations and rewards. Implementation is occurring in a hypothesis-driven fashion, permitting testing and refinement of the strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52249089805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52249089805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181d2b2

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181d2b2

M3 - Article

C2 - 18728439

AN - SCOPUS:52249089805

VL - 83

SP - 837

EP - 844

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 9

ER -