Surface complexation models: An evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration data

Kim F. Hayes, George Redden, Wendell P Ela, James O. Leckie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

345 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability of surface complexation models (SCMs) to fit sets of titration data as a function of changes in model parameters was evaluated using FITEQL and acid-base titration data of α-FeOOH, α-Al2O3, and TiO2. Three SCMs were evaluated: the triple-layer model (TLM), the constant capacitance model (CCM), and the diffuse-layer model (DLM). For all models evaluated, increasing the model input value for the total number of surface sites caused a decrease in the best-fit Log K values of the surface protolysis constants. In the case of the CCM, the best-fit surface protolysis constants were relatively insensitive to changes in the value of the capacitance fitting parameter, C1, particularly for values of C1 greater than 1.2 F/m2. Similarly, the best-fit values of TLM surface electrolyte binding constants were less influenced by changes in the value of C1 when C1 was greater than 1.2 F/m2. For a given C1 value, the best-fit TLM values of the electrolyte binding constants were sensitive to changes in ΔpKa up to ΔpKa values of 3. For ΔpKa values above 3, no changes in the best-fit electrolyte binding constants were observed. Effects of the quality and extent of titration data on the best-fit values for surface constants are discussed for each model. A method is suggested for choosing a unique set of parameter values for each of the models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-469
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Colloid and Interface Science
Volume142
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oxide minerals
Complexation
Titration
titration
Parameter estimation
minerals
oxides
evaluation
Electrolytes
Capacitance
capacitance
electrolytes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Colloid and Surface Chemistry
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Surfaces and Interfaces

Cite this

Surface complexation models : An evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration data. / Hayes, Kim F.; Redden, George; Ela, Wendell P; Leckie, James O.

In: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 142, No. 2, 15.03.1991, p. 448-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e93155789374393ad5f25eb5033d871,
title = "Surface complexation models: An evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration data",
abstract = "The ability of surface complexation models (SCMs) to fit sets of titration data as a function of changes in model parameters was evaluated using FITEQL and acid-base titration data of α-FeOOH, α-Al2O3, and TiO2. Three SCMs were evaluated: the triple-layer model (TLM), the constant capacitance model (CCM), and the diffuse-layer model (DLM). For all models evaluated, increasing the model input value for the total number of surface sites caused a decrease in the best-fit Log K values of the surface protolysis constants. In the case of the CCM, the best-fit surface protolysis constants were relatively insensitive to changes in the value of the capacitance fitting parameter, C1, particularly for values of C1 greater than 1.2 F/m2. Similarly, the best-fit values of TLM surface electrolyte binding constants were less influenced by changes in the value of C1 when C1 was greater than 1.2 F/m2. For a given C1 value, the best-fit TLM values of the electrolyte binding constants were sensitive to changes in ΔpKa up to ΔpKa values of 3. For ΔpKa values above 3, no changes in the best-fit electrolyte binding constants were observed. Effects of the quality and extent of titration data on the best-fit values for surface constants are discussed for each model. A method is suggested for choosing a unique set of parameter values for each of the models.",
author = "Hayes, {Kim F.} and George Redden and Ela, {Wendell P} and Leckie, {James O.}",
year = "1991",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/0021-9797(91)90075-J",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "448--469",
journal = "Journal of Colloid and Interface Science",
issn = "0021-9797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surface complexation models

T2 - An evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration data

AU - Hayes, Kim F.

AU - Redden, George

AU - Ela, Wendell P

AU - Leckie, James O.

PY - 1991/3/15

Y1 - 1991/3/15

N2 - The ability of surface complexation models (SCMs) to fit sets of titration data as a function of changes in model parameters was evaluated using FITEQL and acid-base titration data of α-FeOOH, α-Al2O3, and TiO2. Three SCMs were evaluated: the triple-layer model (TLM), the constant capacitance model (CCM), and the diffuse-layer model (DLM). For all models evaluated, increasing the model input value for the total number of surface sites caused a decrease in the best-fit Log K values of the surface protolysis constants. In the case of the CCM, the best-fit surface protolysis constants were relatively insensitive to changes in the value of the capacitance fitting parameter, C1, particularly for values of C1 greater than 1.2 F/m2. Similarly, the best-fit values of TLM surface electrolyte binding constants were less influenced by changes in the value of C1 when C1 was greater than 1.2 F/m2. For a given C1 value, the best-fit TLM values of the electrolyte binding constants were sensitive to changes in ΔpKa up to ΔpKa values of 3. For ΔpKa values above 3, no changes in the best-fit electrolyte binding constants were observed. Effects of the quality and extent of titration data on the best-fit values for surface constants are discussed for each model. A method is suggested for choosing a unique set of parameter values for each of the models.

AB - The ability of surface complexation models (SCMs) to fit sets of titration data as a function of changes in model parameters was evaluated using FITEQL and acid-base titration data of α-FeOOH, α-Al2O3, and TiO2. Three SCMs were evaluated: the triple-layer model (TLM), the constant capacitance model (CCM), and the diffuse-layer model (DLM). For all models evaluated, increasing the model input value for the total number of surface sites caused a decrease in the best-fit Log K values of the surface protolysis constants. In the case of the CCM, the best-fit surface protolysis constants were relatively insensitive to changes in the value of the capacitance fitting parameter, C1, particularly for values of C1 greater than 1.2 F/m2. Similarly, the best-fit values of TLM surface electrolyte binding constants were less influenced by changes in the value of C1 when C1 was greater than 1.2 F/m2. For a given C1 value, the best-fit TLM values of the electrolyte binding constants were sensitive to changes in ΔpKa up to ΔpKa values of 3. For ΔpKa values above 3, no changes in the best-fit electrolyte binding constants were observed. Effects of the quality and extent of titration data on the best-fit values for surface constants are discussed for each model. A method is suggested for choosing a unique set of parameter values for each of the models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026124083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026124083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0021-9797(91)90075-J

DO - 10.1016/0021-9797(91)90075-J

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026124083

VL - 142

SP - 448

EP - 469

JO - Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

JF - Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

SN - 0021-9797

IS - 2

ER -