Systems consolidation and hippocampus

Two views

Lynn Nadel, Gordon Winocur, T Lee Ryan, Morris Moscovitch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two approaches to systems-level memory consolidation are contrasted. The standard model and multiple trace theory are spelled out, their implications are outlined, and their fit to the data from a number of approaches is evaluated. We conclude that the data from neuroimaging studies strongly support multiple trace theory, that data from neuropsychological studies favor but does not conclusively support multiple trace theory, while evidence from a new approach, the study of prospective memory, also supporting multiple trace theory, offers a promising new way to distinguish between these two theories. Work with animals is largely consistent with this conclusion. We suggest that the hippocampal and neocortical systems are critical for different forms of memory, and that the shift of memory from dependence on hippocampus to dependence on neocortex during consolidation is a reflection of the fact that memory often is transformed with time, becoming more generic in nature. Insofar as detailed episodic recollections are retained, the data show that they are dependent on the hippocampal system, much as multiple trace theory postulated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-66
Number of pages12
JournalDebates in Neuroscience
Volume1
Issue number2-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Hippocampus
Episodic Memory
Neocortex
Neuroimaging
Memory Consolidation

Keywords

  • Context
  • Hippocampus
  • Multiple trace theory
  • Systems consolidation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Systems consolidation and hippocampus : Two views. / Nadel, Lynn; Winocur, Gordon; Ryan, T Lee; Moscovitch, Morris.

In: Debates in Neuroscience, Vol. 1, No. 2-4, 12.2007, p. 55-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nadel, Lynn ; Winocur, Gordon ; Ryan, T Lee ; Moscovitch, Morris. / Systems consolidation and hippocampus : Two views. In: Debates in Neuroscience. 2007 ; Vol. 1, No. 2-4. pp. 55-66.
@article{70c211f61d684cf6b5ed78e148133eeb,
title = "Systems consolidation and hippocampus: Two views",
abstract = "Two approaches to systems-level memory consolidation are contrasted. The standard model and multiple trace theory are spelled out, their implications are outlined, and their fit to the data from a number of approaches is evaluated. We conclude that the data from neuroimaging studies strongly support multiple trace theory, that data from neuropsychological studies favor but does not conclusively support multiple trace theory, while evidence from a new approach, the study of prospective memory, also supporting multiple trace theory, offers a promising new way to distinguish between these two theories. Work with animals is largely consistent with this conclusion. We suggest that the hippocampal and neocortical systems are critical for different forms of memory, and that the shift of memory from dependence on hippocampus to dependence on neocortex during consolidation is a reflection of the fact that memory often is transformed with time, becoming more generic in nature. Insofar as detailed episodic recollections are retained, the data show that they are dependent on the hippocampal system, much as multiple trace theory postulated.",
keywords = "Context, Hippocampus, Multiple trace theory, Systems consolidation",
author = "Lynn Nadel and Gordon Winocur and Ryan, {T Lee} and Morris Moscovitch",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11559-007-9003-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "55--66",
journal = "Debates in Neuroscience",
issn = "1559-8314",
number = "2-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systems consolidation and hippocampus

T2 - Two views

AU - Nadel, Lynn

AU - Winocur, Gordon

AU - Ryan, T Lee

AU - Moscovitch, Morris

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Two approaches to systems-level memory consolidation are contrasted. The standard model and multiple trace theory are spelled out, their implications are outlined, and their fit to the data from a number of approaches is evaluated. We conclude that the data from neuroimaging studies strongly support multiple trace theory, that data from neuropsychological studies favor but does not conclusively support multiple trace theory, while evidence from a new approach, the study of prospective memory, also supporting multiple trace theory, offers a promising new way to distinguish between these two theories. Work with animals is largely consistent with this conclusion. We suggest that the hippocampal and neocortical systems are critical for different forms of memory, and that the shift of memory from dependence on hippocampus to dependence on neocortex during consolidation is a reflection of the fact that memory often is transformed with time, becoming more generic in nature. Insofar as detailed episodic recollections are retained, the data show that they are dependent on the hippocampal system, much as multiple trace theory postulated.

AB - Two approaches to systems-level memory consolidation are contrasted. The standard model and multiple trace theory are spelled out, their implications are outlined, and their fit to the data from a number of approaches is evaluated. We conclude that the data from neuroimaging studies strongly support multiple trace theory, that data from neuropsychological studies favor but does not conclusively support multiple trace theory, while evidence from a new approach, the study of prospective memory, also supporting multiple trace theory, offers a promising new way to distinguish between these two theories. Work with animals is largely consistent with this conclusion. We suggest that the hippocampal and neocortical systems are critical for different forms of memory, and that the shift of memory from dependence on hippocampus to dependence on neocortex during consolidation is a reflection of the fact that memory often is transformed with time, becoming more generic in nature. Insofar as detailed episodic recollections are retained, the data show that they are dependent on the hippocampal system, much as multiple trace theory postulated.

KW - Context

KW - Hippocampus

KW - Multiple trace theory

KW - Systems consolidation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37249037130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37249037130&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11559-007-9003-9

DO - 10.1007/s11559-007-9003-9

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 55

EP - 66

JO - Debates in Neuroscience

JF - Debates in Neuroscience

SN - 1559-8314

IS - 2-4

ER -