Teaching planners about infrastructures

A call to civil engineers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

More than 40% of the more than 20,000 planners in the United States influence the manner in which water, sewer, drainage, streets, and other kinds of physical infrastructure are planned and used. But to what extent are planners educated about infrastructure? Information suggests that only about half of the accredited urban planning programs offer infrastructure engineering and planning in their curricula. Fewer than 10% include infrastructure instruction to their core curriculum. New information provides some insight into the current state of infrastructure education in graduate planning programs. This paper reviews and comments upon the situation, and offers curricular recommendations to graduate planning programs. This paper also challenges civil engineers to become involved in the education of professional planners in specific ways since it is engineers, and not planners, who will be blamed for infrastructure that is badly arranged by the planning process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-76
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume113
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

civil engineer
teaching
Teaching
infrastructure
Engineers
Planning
Curricula
program planning
Education
curriculum
Urban planning
Sewers
graduate
education
Drainage
planning process
urban planning
engineer
drainage
engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Development
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Teaching planners about infrastructures : A call to civil engineers. / Nelson, Arthur Christian.

In: Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 113, No. 2, 1987, p. 67-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac1fe5e63d8e45b39656667c5b3c6802,
title = "Teaching planners about infrastructures: A call to civil engineers",
abstract = "More than 40{\%} of the more than 20,000 planners in the United States influence the manner in which water, sewer, drainage, streets, and other kinds of physical infrastructure are planned and used. But to what extent are planners educated about infrastructure? Information suggests that only about half of the accredited urban planning programs offer infrastructure engineering and planning in their curricula. Fewer than 10{\%} include infrastructure instruction to their core curriculum. New information provides some insight into the current state of infrastructure education in graduate planning programs. This paper reviews and comments upon the situation, and offers curricular recommendations to graduate planning programs. This paper also challenges civil engineers to become involved in the education of professional planners in specific ways since it is engineers, and not planners, who will be blamed for infrastructure that is badly arranged by the planning process.",
author = "Nelson, {Arthur Christian}",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1987)113:2(67)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "67--76",
journal = "Journal of the Urban Planning and Development Division, ASCE",
issn = "0733-9488",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching planners about infrastructures

T2 - A call to civil engineers

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - More than 40% of the more than 20,000 planners in the United States influence the manner in which water, sewer, drainage, streets, and other kinds of physical infrastructure are planned and used. But to what extent are planners educated about infrastructure? Information suggests that only about half of the accredited urban planning programs offer infrastructure engineering and planning in their curricula. Fewer than 10% include infrastructure instruction to their core curriculum. New information provides some insight into the current state of infrastructure education in graduate planning programs. This paper reviews and comments upon the situation, and offers curricular recommendations to graduate planning programs. This paper also challenges civil engineers to become involved in the education of professional planners in specific ways since it is engineers, and not planners, who will be blamed for infrastructure that is badly arranged by the planning process.

AB - More than 40% of the more than 20,000 planners in the United States influence the manner in which water, sewer, drainage, streets, and other kinds of physical infrastructure are planned and used. But to what extent are planners educated about infrastructure? Information suggests that only about half of the accredited urban planning programs offer infrastructure engineering and planning in their curricula. Fewer than 10% include infrastructure instruction to their core curriculum. New information provides some insight into the current state of infrastructure education in graduate planning programs. This paper reviews and comments upon the situation, and offers curricular recommendations to graduate planning programs. This paper also challenges civil engineers to become involved in the education of professional planners in specific ways since it is engineers, and not planners, who will be blamed for infrastructure that is badly arranged by the planning process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887563426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887563426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1987)113:2(67)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1987)113:2(67)

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 67

EP - 76

JO - Journal of the Urban Planning and Development Division, ASCE

JF - Journal of the Urban Planning and Development Division, ASCE

SN - 0733-9488

IS - 2

ER -