Telemedicine versus in-person dermatology referrals: an analysis of case complexity.

Elizabeth A Krupinski, Gail P Barker, Gilmer Rodriguez, Michael Engstrom, Norman Levine, Ana Maria Lopez, Ronald S Weinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether teledermatology referrals differ significantly from in-person referrals with respect to case complexity and diagnosis of cases referred. Teledermatology cases were compared to in-person cases seen by the same university dermatologist who also reviews the teledermatology cases. These were also compared with in-person cases evaluated by a different dermatologist at local clinics using traditional referral patterns. Study parameters included Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes as a measure of case complexity, International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes as a measure of case types, and time from referral to actual consultation. The most common CPT codes used for teledermatology were 99241 and 99242 with no significant differences in the frequency of assigned CPT codes for teledermatology versus in-person consultation. An analysis of the diagnostic codes revealed no significant differences between the types of cases referred to telemedicine and those referred for in-person consultation. Time between referral and actual encounter with the dermatologist was significantly shorter via telemedicine than either local or university clinic in-person visits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-147
Number of pages5
JournalTelemedicine Journal and e-Health
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2002

Fingerprint

Dermatology
Telemedicine
Terminology
Systems Analysis
Referral and Consultation
Current Procedural Terminology
International Classification of Diseases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Bioengineering
  • Media Technology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Telemedicine versus in-person dermatology referrals : an analysis of case complexity. / Krupinski, Elizabeth A; Barker, Gail P; Rodriguez, Gilmer; Engstrom, Michael; Levine, Norman; Lopez, Ana Maria; Weinstein, Ronald S.

In: Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Vol. 8, No. 2, 06.2002, p. 143-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3e9f0658419c48fbb7d3aea0c941aba9,
title = "Telemedicine versus in-person dermatology referrals: an analysis of case complexity.",
abstract = "The goal of this study was to determine whether teledermatology referrals differ significantly from in-person referrals with respect to case complexity and diagnosis of cases referred. Teledermatology cases were compared to in-person cases seen by the same university dermatologist who also reviews the teledermatology cases. These were also compared with in-person cases evaluated by a different dermatologist at local clinics using traditional referral patterns. Study parameters included Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes as a measure of case complexity, International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes as a measure of case types, and time from referral to actual consultation. The most common CPT codes used for teledermatology were 99241 and 99242 with no significant differences in the frequency of assigned CPT codes for teledermatology versus in-person consultation. An analysis of the diagnostic codes revealed no significant differences between the types of cases referred to telemedicine and those referred for in-person consultation. Time between referral and actual encounter with the dermatologist was significantly shorter via telemedicine than either local or university clinic in-person visits.",
author = "Krupinski, {Elizabeth A} and Barker, {Gail P} and Gilmer Rodriguez and Michael Engstrom and Norman Levine and Lopez, {Ana Maria} and Weinstein, {Ronald S}",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "143--147",
journal = "Telemedicine Journal and e-Health",
issn = "1530-5627",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telemedicine versus in-person dermatology referrals

T2 - an analysis of case complexity.

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

AU - Barker, Gail P

AU - Rodriguez, Gilmer

AU - Engstrom, Michael

AU - Levine, Norman

AU - Lopez, Ana Maria

AU - Weinstein, Ronald S

PY - 2002/6

Y1 - 2002/6

N2 - The goal of this study was to determine whether teledermatology referrals differ significantly from in-person referrals with respect to case complexity and diagnosis of cases referred. Teledermatology cases were compared to in-person cases seen by the same university dermatologist who also reviews the teledermatology cases. These were also compared with in-person cases evaluated by a different dermatologist at local clinics using traditional referral patterns. Study parameters included Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes as a measure of case complexity, International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes as a measure of case types, and time from referral to actual consultation. The most common CPT codes used for teledermatology were 99241 and 99242 with no significant differences in the frequency of assigned CPT codes for teledermatology versus in-person consultation. An analysis of the diagnostic codes revealed no significant differences between the types of cases referred to telemedicine and those referred for in-person consultation. Time between referral and actual encounter with the dermatologist was significantly shorter via telemedicine than either local or university clinic in-person visits.

AB - The goal of this study was to determine whether teledermatology referrals differ significantly from in-person referrals with respect to case complexity and diagnosis of cases referred. Teledermatology cases were compared to in-person cases seen by the same university dermatologist who also reviews the teledermatology cases. These were also compared with in-person cases evaluated by a different dermatologist at local clinics using traditional referral patterns. Study parameters included Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes as a measure of case complexity, International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes as a measure of case types, and time from referral to actual consultation. The most common CPT codes used for teledermatology were 99241 and 99242 with no significant differences in the frequency of assigned CPT codes for teledermatology versus in-person consultation. An analysis of the diagnostic codes revealed no significant differences between the types of cases referred to telemedicine and those referred for in-person consultation. Time between referral and actual encounter with the dermatologist was significantly shorter via telemedicine than either local or university clinic in-person visits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036593386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036593386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12079603

AN - SCOPUS:0036593386

VL - 8

SP - 143

EP - 147

JO - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

JF - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

SN - 1530-5627

IS - 2

ER -