Terror Management and Aggression: Evidence That Mortality Salience Motivates Aggression Against Worldview-Threatening Others

Holly A. McGregor, Jeff Greenberg, Jamie Arndt, Joel D. Lieberman, Sheldon Solomon, Linda Simon, Tom Pyszczynski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 295 Citations

Abstract

The hypothesis that mortality salience (MS) motivates aggression against worldview-threating others was tested in 4 studies. In Study 1, the experimenters induced participants to write about either their own death or a control topic, presented them with a target who either disparaged their political views or did not, and gave them the opportunity to choose the amount of hot sauce the target would have to consume. As predicted, MS participants allocated a particularly large amount of hot sauce to the worldview-threatening target. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors found that following MS induction, the opportunity to express a negative attitude toward the critical target eliminated aggression and the opportunity to aggress against the target eliminated derogation. This suggests that derogation and aggression are two alternative modes of responding to MS that serve the same psychological function. Finally, Study 4 showed that MS did not encourage aggression against a person who allocated unpleasant juice to the participant, supporting the specificity of MS-induced aggression to worldview-threatening others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)590-605
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume74
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

aggression
mortality
Aggression
Mortality
worldview
participant
induction
terrorism
death
hypothesis
human being
attitude
alternative
function
control
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Terror Management and Aggression : Evidence That Mortality Salience Motivates Aggression Against Worldview-Threatening Others. / McGregor, Holly A.; Greenberg, Jeff; Arndt, Jamie; Lieberman, Joel D.; Solomon, Sheldon; Simon, Linda; Pyszczynski, Tom.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 3, 1998, p. 590-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGregor, Holly A.; Greenberg, Jeff; Arndt, Jamie; Lieberman, Joel D.; Solomon, Sheldon; Simon, Linda; Pyszczynski, Tom / Terror Management and Aggression : Evidence That Mortality Salience Motivates Aggression Against Worldview-Threatening Others.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 3, 1998, p. 590-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82ebaf1288e04cbbb3bf576d9385a44b,
title = "Terror Management and Aggression: Evidence That Mortality Salience Motivates Aggression Against Worldview-Threatening Others",
abstract = "The hypothesis that mortality salience (MS) motivates aggression against worldview-threating others was tested in 4 studies. In Study 1, the experimenters induced participants to write about either their own death or a control topic, presented them with a target who either disparaged their political views or did not, and gave them the opportunity to choose the amount of hot sauce the target would have to consume. As predicted, MS participants allocated a particularly large amount of hot sauce to the worldview-threatening target. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors found that following MS induction, the opportunity to express a negative attitude toward the critical target eliminated aggression and the opportunity to aggress against the target eliminated derogation. This suggests that derogation and aggression are two alternative modes of responding to MS that serve the same psychological function. Finally, Study 4 showed that MS did not encourage aggression against a person who allocated unpleasant juice to the participant, supporting the specificity of MS-induced aggression to worldview-threatening others.",
author = "McGregor, {Holly A.} and Jeff Greenberg and Jamie Arndt and Lieberman, {Joel D.} and Sheldon Solomon and Linda Simon and Tom Pyszczynski",
year = "1998",
volume = "74",
pages = "590--605",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Terror Management and Aggression

T2 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

AU - McGregor,Holly A.

AU - Greenberg,Jeff

AU - Arndt,Jamie

AU - Lieberman,Joel D.

AU - Solomon,Sheldon

AU - Simon,Linda

AU - Pyszczynski,Tom

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The hypothesis that mortality salience (MS) motivates aggression against worldview-threating others was tested in 4 studies. In Study 1, the experimenters induced participants to write about either their own death or a control topic, presented them with a target who either disparaged their political views or did not, and gave them the opportunity to choose the amount of hot sauce the target would have to consume. As predicted, MS participants allocated a particularly large amount of hot sauce to the worldview-threatening target. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors found that following MS induction, the opportunity to express a negative attitude toward the critical target eliminated aggression and the opportunity to aggress against the target eliminated derogation. This suggests that derogation and aggression are two alternative modes of responding to MS that serve the same psychological function. Finally, Study 4 showed that MS did not encourage aggression against a person who allocated unpleasant juice to the participant, supporting the specificity of MS-induced aggression to worldview-threatening others.

AB - The hypothesis that mortality salience (MS) motivates aggression against worldview-threating others was tested in 4 studies. In Study 1, the experimenters induced participants to write about either their own death or a control topic, presented them with a target who either disparaged their political views or did not, and gave them the opportunity to choose the amount of hot sauce the target would have to consume. As predicted, MS participants allocated a particularly large amount of hot sauce to the worldview-threatening target. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors found that following MS induction, the opportunity to express a negative attitude toward the critical target eliminated aggression and the opportunity to aggress against the target eliminated derogation. This suggests that derogation and aggression are two alternative modes of responding to MS that serve the same psychological function. Finally, Study 4 showed that MS did not encourage aggression against a person who allocated unpleasant juice to the participant, supporting the specificity of MS-induced aggression to worldview-threatening others.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032011394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032011394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 590

EP - 605

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -