Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children

Frank Musiek, Nathan A. Geurkink, Stephanie A. Kietel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Seven central auditory tests were administered to 22 children, 8 to 10 years of age, considered as having auditory processing deficits. Analysis of the results indicated some tests to be significantly more sensitive than others in detecting auditory processing problems. Findings also demonstrated the advantages of a test battery over a single test and the value of employing central auditory tests for the detection of auditory processing difficulties in children. In addition, considerations for proper test battery construction are discussed in light of the results from this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-257
Number of pages7
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume92
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Musiek, F., Geurkink, N. A., & Kietel, S. A. (1982). Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children. Laryngoscope, 92(3), 251-257.

Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children. / Musiek, Frank; Geurkink, Nathan A.; Kietel, Stephanie A.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 92, No. 3, 1982, p. 251-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Musiek, F, Geurkink, NA & Kietel, SA 1982, 'Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children', Laryngoscope, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 251-257.
Musiek, Frank ; Geurkink, Nathan A. ; Kietel, Stephanie A. / Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children. In: Laryngoscope. 1982 ; Vol. 92, No. 3. pp. 251-257.
@article{60b8f99ac01d43a88ac04fd1871a2b4f,
title = "Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children",
abstract = "Seven central auditory tests were administered to 22 children, 8 to 10 years of age, considered as having auditory processing deficits. Analysis of the results indicated some tests to be significantly more sensitive than others in detecting auditory processing problems. Findings also demonstrated the advantages of a test battery over a single test and the value of employing central auditory tests for the detection of auditory processing difficulties in children. In addition, considerations for proper test battery construction are discussed in light of the results from this study.",
author = "Frank Musiek and Geurkink, {Nathan A.} and Kietel, {Stephanie A.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "251--257",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children

AU - Musiek, Frank

AU - Geurkink, Nathan A.

AU - Kietel, Stephanie A.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Seven central auditory tests were administered to 22 children, 8 to 10 years of age, considered as having auditory processing deficits. Analysis of the results indicated some tests to be significantly more sensitive than others in detecting auditory processing problems. Findings also demonstrated the advantages of a test battery over a single test and the value of employing central auditory tests for the detection of auditory processing difficulties in children. In addition, considerations for proper test battery construction are discussed in light of the results from this study.

AB - Seven central auditory tests were administered to 22 children, 8 to 10 years of age, considered as having auditory processing deficits. Analysis of the results indicated some tests to be significantly more sensitive than others in detecting auditory processing problems. Findings also demonstrated the advantages of a test battery over a single test and the value of employing central auditory tests for the detection of auditory processing difficulties in children. In addition, considerations for proper test battery construction are discussed in light of the results from this study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020042769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020042769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7070168

AN - SCOPUS:0020042769

VL - 92

SP - 251

EP - 257

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 3

ER -