Testing the churchill hypothesis: Popular support for democracy and its alternatives

Richard Rose, William T Mishler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whereas many studies of democratization evaluate it in idealist terms, Winston Churchill offered a relativist criterion, democracy being a lesser evil compared to other types of regime. Since everyone in a post-Communist society has lived in at least two different regimes, the New Democracies Barometer survey of post-Communist countries can ask people to evaluate five alternative regimes: a return to Communist rule, the army taking over, monarchy, rule by a strong leader, and decision making by economic experts. Factor analysis shows endorsement of three alternatives - the return to Communism, army rule, and personal dictatorship - form an authoritarianism scale. It also shows support for authoritarian rule is confined to a minority. Five hypotheses are tested to see what accounts for this. The political legacy of the past is more important than current government performance, economic attitudes, social structure differences, and national culture and traditions. Endorsement of economic technocrats making decisions is not related to authoritarianism; it reflects some national differences. Given the importance of experiencing both democratic and undemocratic regimes, the Churchill hypothesis does not apply in a country that has not yet attempted to introduce democratic institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-58
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Public Policy
Volume16
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democracy
authoritarianism
regime
economics
decision making
military
communism
democratization
social structure
post-communist society
factor analysis
monarchy
national culture
dictatorship
minority
expert
leader
performance
society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Testing the churchill hypothesis : Popular support for democracy and its alternatives. / Rose, Richard; Mishler, William T.

In: Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.1996, p. 29-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b007f30745fa49cdad3c317fe234b6e4,
title = "Testing the churchill hypothesis: Popular support for democracy and its alternatives",
abstract = "Whereas many studies of democratization evaluate it in idealist terms, Winston Churchill offered a relativist criterion, democracy being a lesser evil compared to other types of regime. Since everyone in a post-Communist society has lived in at least two different regimes, the New Democracies Barometer survey of post-Communist countries can ask people to evaluate five alternative regimes: a return to Communist rule, the army taking over, monarchy, rule by a strong leader, and decision making by economic experts. Factor analysis shows endorsement of three alternatives - the return to Communism, army rule, and personal dictatorship - form an authoritarianism scale. It also shows support for authoritarian rule is confined to a minority. Five hypotheses are tested to see what accounts for this. The political legacy of the past is more important than current government performance, economic attitudes, social structure differences, and national culture and traditions. Endorsement of economic technocrats making decisions is not related to authoritarianism; it reflects some national differences. Given the importance of experiencing both democratic and undemocratic regimes, the Churchill hypothesis does not apply in a country that has not yet attempted to introduce democratic institutions.",
author = "Richard Rose and Mishler, {William T}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "29--58",
journal = "Journal of Public Policy",
issn = "0143-814X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the churchill hypothesis

T2 - Popular support for democracy and its alternatives

AU - Rose, Richard

AU - Mishler, William T

PY - 1996/1

Y1 - 1996/1

N2 - Whereas many studies of democratization evaluate it in idealist terms, Winston Churchill offered a relativist criterion, democracy being a lesser evil compared to other types of regime. Since everyone in a post-Communist society has lived in at least two different regimes, the New Democracies Barometer survey of post-Communist countries can ask people to evaluate five alternative regimes: a return to Communist rule, the army taking over, monarchy, rule by a strong leader, and decision making by economic experts. Factor analysis shows endorsement of three alternatives - the return to Communism, army rule, and personal dictatorship - form an authoritarianism scale. It also shows support for authoritarian rule is confined to a minority. Five hypotheses are tested to see what accounts for this. The political legacy of the past is more important than current government performance, economic attitudes, social structure differences, and national culture and traditions. Endorsement of economic technocrats making decisions is not related to authoritarianism; it reflects some national differences. Given the importance of experiencing both democratic and undemocratic regimes, the Churchill hypothesis does not apply in a country that has not yet attempted to introduce democratic institutions.

AB - Whereas many studies of democratization evaluate it in idealist terms, Winston Churchill offered a relativist criterion, democracy being a lesser evil compared to other types of regime. Since everyone in a post-Communist society has lived in at least two different regimes, the New Democracies Barometer survey of post-Communist countries can ask people to evaluate five alternative regimes: a return to Communist rule, the army taking over, monarchy, rule by a strong leader, and decision making by economic experts. Factor analysis shows endorsement of three alternatives - the return to Communism, army rule, and personal dictatorship - form an authoritarianism scale. It also shows support for authoritarian rule is confined to a minority. Five hypotheses are tested to see what accounts for this. The political legacy of the past is more important than current government performance, economic attitudes, social structure differences, and national culture and traditions. Endorsement of economic technocrats making decisions is not related to authoritarianism; it reflects some national differences. Given the importance of experiencing both democratic and undemocratic regimes, the Churchill hypothesis does not apply in a country that has not yet attempted to introduce democratic institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007487701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007487701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007487701

VL - 16

SP - 29

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Public Policy

JF - Journal of Public Policy

SN - 0143-814X

IS - 1

ER -