Tests of emigration in small mammals under experimental conditions

A. R. Nelson, C. L. Johnson, William J Matter, Robert W Mannan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Holding animals in enclosures that block emigration causes demographic abnormalities called "fence effects." Experimenters have built exits that require animals to move through unfavorable conditions to leave enclosures. There are doubts about whether individuals that cross these challenging exits are true emigrants. We tested whether an exit that required house mice (Mus musculus) to swim through a water-filled trough was used only by mice triggered to emigrate from an experimental enclosure. Also, we examined the responses of mice to the availability of resources and the presence of conspecific adult animals in a small enclosure with an exit and in an enclosure made by joining two single enclosures. All mice left a barren enclosure within 12 h but no mice left during 7-day trials in a resource-rich enclosure during spring and summer. At the end of trials with repeated introduction of pairs of mice, about 85% of resident mice were the first mice added. Nearly all mice added later left the enclosure. A relatively constant number of mice became residents in small enclosures and about 2.3 times as many mice resided in double enclosures. Mice readily found and used exits when motivated to leave and did not accidentally pass through exits during routine exploration. Thus, mice that stayed in enclosures were not "fenced in" by the water-filled exit and exhibited residency as in nature. Tests of exits should give ecologists confidence that animals can display normal residency and emigration behaviors in experimental settings. The defense of resources by residents and the emigration of excess animals resulted in a consistent limit to the number of animals able to reside in enclosures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2056-2060
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Zoology
Volume80
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002

Fingerprint

emigration
small mammal
small mammals
animal
mice
testing
resource
Mus musculus
animals
abnormality
test
trough
water troughs
water
fences
summer
ecologists
demographic statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Tests of emigration in small mammals under experimental conditions. / Nelson, A. R.; Johnson, C. L.; Matter, William J; Mannan, Robert W.

In: Canadian Journal of Zoology, Vol. 80, No. 12, 01.12.2002, p. 2056-2060.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{289a66da7cab43fe9e60ec30c6392e67,
title = "Tests of emigration in small mammals under experimental conditions",
abstract = "Holding animals in enclosures that block emigration causes demographic abnormalities called {"}fence effects.{"} Experimenters have built exits that require animals to move through unfavorable conditions to leave enclosures. There are doubts about whether individuals that cross these challenging exits are true emigrants. We tested whether an exit that required house mice (Mus musculus) to swim through a water-filled trough was used only by mice triggered to emigrate from an experimental enclosure. Also, we examined the responses of mice to the availability of resources and the presence of conspecific adult animals in a small enclosure with an exit and in an enclosure made by joining two single enclosures. All mice left a barren enclosure within 12 h but no mice left during 7-day trials in a resource-rich enclosure during spring and summer. At the end of trials with repeated introduction of pairs of mice, about 85{\%} of resident mice were the first mice added. Nearly all mice added later left the enclosure. A relatively constant number of mice became residents in small enclosures and about 2.3 times as many mice resided in double enclosures. Mice readily found and used exits when motivated to leave and did not accidentally pass through exits during routine exploration. Thus, mice that stayed in enclosures were not {"}fenced in{"} by the water-filled exit and exhibited residency as in nature. Tests of exits should give ecologists confidence that animals can display normal residency and emigration behaviors in experimental settings. The defense of resources by residents and the emigration of excess animals resulted in a consistent limit to the number of animals able to reside in enclosures.",
author = "Nelson, {A. R.} and Johnson, {C. L.} and Matter, {William J} and Mannan, {Robert W}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1139/z02-193",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "2056--2060",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Zoology",
issn = "0008-4301",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tests of emigration in small mammals under experimental conditions

AU - Nelson, A. R.

AU - Johnson, C. L.

AU - Matter, William J

AU - Mannan, Robert W

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Holding animals in enclosures that block emigration causes demographic abnormalities called "fence effects." Experimenters have built exits that require animals to move through unfavorable conditions to leave enclosures. There are doubts about whether individuals that cross these challenging exits are true emigrants. We tested whether an exit that required house mice (Mus musculus) to swim through a water-filled trough was used only by mice triggered to emigrate from an experimental enclosure. Also, we examined the responses of mice to the availability of resources and the presence of conspecific adult animals in a small enclosure with an exit and in an enclosure made by joining two single enclosures. All mice left a barren enclosure within 12 h but no mice left during 7-day trials in a resource-rich enclosure during spring and summer. At the end of trials with repeated introduction of pairs of mice, about 85% of resident mice were the first mice added. Nearly all mice added later left the enclosure. A relatively constant number of mice became residents in small enclosures and about 2.3 times as many mice resided in double enclosures. Mice readily found and used exits when motivated to leave and did not accidentally pass through exits during routine exploration. Thus, mice that stayed in enclosures were not "fenced in" by the water-filled exit and exhibited residency as in nature. Tests of exits should give ecologists confidence that animals can display normal residency and emigration behaviors in experimental settings. The defense of resources by residents and the emigration of excess animals resulted in a consistent limit to the number of animals able to reside in enclosures.

AB - Holding animals in enclosures that block emigration causes demographic abnormalities called "fence effects." Experimenters have built exits that require animals to move through unfavorable conditions to leave enclosures. There are doubts about whether individuals that cross these challenging exits are true emigrants. We tested whether an exit that required house mice (Mus musculus) to swim through a water-filled trough was used only by mice triggered to emigrate from an experimental enclosure. Also, we examined the responses of mice to the availability of resources and the presence of conspecific adult animals in a small enclosure with an exit and in an enclosure made by joining two single enclosures. All mice left a barren enclosure within 12 h but no mice left during 7-day trials in a resource-rich enclosure during spring and summer. At the end of trials with repeated introduction of pairs of mice, about 85% of resident mice were the first mice added. Nearly all mice added later left the enclosure. A relatively constant number of mice became residents in small enclosures and about 2.3 times as many mice resided in double enclosures. Mice readily found and used exits when motivated to leave and did not accidentally pass through exits during routine exploration. Thus, mice that stayed in enclosures were not "fenced in" by the water-filled exit and exhibited residency as in nature. Tests of exits should give ecologists confidence that animals can display normal residency and emigration behaviors in experimental settings. The defense of resources by residents and the emigration of excess animals resulted in a consistent limit to the number of animals able to reside in enclosures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036966186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036966186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1139/z02-193

DO - 10.1139/z02-193

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036966186

VL - 80

SP - 2056

EP - 2060

JO - Canadian Journal of Zoology

JF - Canadian Journal of Zoology

SN - 0008-4301

IS - 12

ER -