The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting

Gary W. Edelson, David G Armstrong, Lawrence A. Lavery, Gene Caicco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4% did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7% of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90% of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9% of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0%) than wound cultures (51.4%). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2373-2378
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume156
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 11 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Inpatients
Foot
Lower Extremity
Wounds and Injuries
Debridement
Amputation
Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting. / Edelson, Gary W.; Armstrong, David G; Lavery, Lawrence A.; Caicco, Gene.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 156, No. 20, 11.11.1996, p. 2373-2378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Edelson, Gary W. ; Armstrong, David G ; Lavery, Lawrence A. ; Caicco, Gene. / The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting. In: Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996 ; Vol. 156, No. 20. pp. 2373-2378.
@article{72b2a15313f6449db36fa0cb5488b1db,
title = "The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4{\%} did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7{\%} of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90{\%} of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9{\%} of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0{\%}) than wound cultures (51.4{\%}). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.",
author = "Edelson, {Gary W.} and Armstrong, {David G} and Lavery, {Lawrence A.} and Gene Caicco",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1001/archinte.156.20.2373",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "156",
pages = "2373--2378",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting

AU - Edelson, Gary W.

AU - Armstrong, David G

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

AU - Caicco, Gene

PY - 1996/11/11

Y1 - 1996/11/11

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4% did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7% of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90% of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9% of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0%) than wound cultures (51.4%). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4% did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7% of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90% of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9% of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0%) than wound cultures (51.4%). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029855657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029855657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinte.156.20.2373

DO - 10.1001/archinte.156.20.2373

M3 - Article

C2 - 8911244

AN - SCOPUS:0029855657

VL - 156

SP - 2373

EP - 2378

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 20

ER -