The adaptation of complaints to participation frameworks

Joseph A Bonito, Stacy L. Wolski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Among the strategic uses of various communication media is the practice of addressing and sending messages to multiple participants. The present study was a test of the hypothesis that the participation framework within which a message is sent and the sender's level of message design logic interact to affect message content. Participants sent complaints via email either to a target or to a target and a third‐party peer. Complaints were segmented into thought‐units, with each thought‐unit subsequently categorized according to its junction. The results showed that the two factors interacted to affect complaining, such that persons with conventional and rhetorical design logics often adapted messages to the target‐peer condition, whereas persons with expressive design logics generally did not. Discussion focuses on the implications for research on participation, complaining, and message design logics, as well as for the study of mediated communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)252-268
Number of pages17
JournalCommunication Studies
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Logic design
complaint
communication media
participation
human being
communication
Communication
Electronic mail

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

The adaptation of complaints to participation frameworks. / Bonito, Joseph A; Wolski, Stacy L.

In: Communication Studies, Vol. 53, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 252-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bonito, Joseph A ; Wolski, Stacy L. / The adaptation of complaints to participation frameworks. In: Communication Studies. 2002 ; Vol. 53, No. 3. pp. 252-268.
@article{5cba13dad17c4f9886114716f79da47d,
title = "The adaptation of complaints to participation frameworks",
abstract = "Among the strategic uses of various communication media is the practice of addressing and sending messages to multiple participants. The present study was a test of the hypothesis that the participation framework within which a message is sent and the sender's level of message design logic interact to affect message content. Participants sent complaints via email either to a target or to a target and a third‐party peer. Complaints were segmented into thought‐units, with each thought‐unit subsequently categorized according to its junction. The results showed that the two factors interacted to affect complaining, such that persons with conventional and rhetorical design logics often adapted messages to the target‐peer condition, whereas persons with expressive design logics generally did not. Discussion focuses on the implications for research on participation, complaining, and message design logics, as well as for the study of mediated communication.",
author = "Bonito, {Joseph A} and Wolski, {Stacy L.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10510970209388589",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "252--268",
journal = "Communication Studies",
issn = "1051-0974",
publisher = "Central States Communication Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The adaptation of complaints to participation frameworks

AU - Bonito, Joseph A

AU - Wolski, Stacy L.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Among the strategic uses of various communication media is the practice of addressing and sending messages to multiple participants. The present study was a test of the hypothesis that the participation framework within which a message is sent and the sender's level of message design logic interact to affect message content. Participants sent complaints via email either to a target or to a target and a third‐party peer. Complaints were segmented into thought‐units, with each thought‐unit subsequently categorized according to its junction. The results showed that the two factors interacted to affect complaining, such that persons with conventional and rhetorical design logics often adapted messages to the target‐peer condition, whereas persons with expressive design logics generally did not. Discussion focuses on the implications for research on participation, complaining, and message design logics, as well as for the study of mediated communication.

AB - Among the strategic uses of various communication media is the practice of addressing and sending messages to multiple participants. The present study was a test of the hypothesis that the participation framework within which a message is sent and the sender's level of message design logic interact to affect message content. Participants sent complaints via email either to a target or to a target and a third‐party peer. Complaints were segmented into thought‐units, with each thought‐unit subsequently categorized according to its junction. The results showed that the two factors interacted to affect complaining, such that persons with conventional and rhetorical design logics often adapted messages to the target‐peer condition, whereas persons with expressive design logics generally did not. Discussion focuses on the implications for research on participation, complaining, and message design logics, as well as for the study of mediated communication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9544248281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9544248281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10510970209388589

DO - 10.1080/10510970209388589

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:9544248281

VL - 53

SP - 252

EP - 268

JO - Communication Studies

JF - Communication Studies

SN - 1051-0974

IS - 3

ER -