The aerodynamic puzzle of nasalized fricatives: Aerodynamic and perceptual evidence from Scottish Gaelic

Natasha Warner, Daniel Brenner, Jessamyn Schertz, Andrew H Carnie, Muriel Fisher, Michael Hammond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scottish Gaelic is sometimes described as having nasalized fricatives (/?/distinctively, and [f, x, h], etc. through assimilation). However, there are claims that it is not aerodynamically possible to open the velum for nasalization while maintaining frication noise. We present aerodynamic data from 14 native Scottish Gaelic speakers to determine how the posited nasalized fricatives in this language are realized. Most tokens demonstrate loss of nasalization, but nasalization does occur in some contexts without aerodynamic conflict, e.g., nasalization with the consonant realized as an approximant, nasalization of [h], nasalization on the preceding vowel, or sequential frication and nasalization. Furthermore, a very few tokens do contain simultaneous nasalization and frication with a tradeoff in airflow. We also present perceptual evidence showing that Gaelic listeners can hear this distinction slightly better than chance. Thus, instrumental data from one of the few languages in the world described as having nasalized fricatives confirms that the claimed sounds are not made by producing strong nasalization concurrently with clear frication noise. Furthermore, although speakers most often neutralize the nasalization, when they maintain it, they do so through a variety of phonetic mechanisms, even within a single language.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-241
Number of pages45
JournalLaboratory Phonology
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Aerodynamics
Language
Speech analysis
Noise
language
evidence
Phonetics
Acoustic waves
phonetics
listener
assimilation
Fricatives
Nasalization
Scottish Gaelic
Frication
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Airflow
  • Gaelic
  • Nasalization
  • Nasalized fricatives
  • Perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Podiatry
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

The aerodynamic puzzle of nasalized fricatives : Aerodynamic and perceptual evidence from Scottish Gaelic. / Warner, Natasha; Brenner, Daniel; Schertz, Jessamyn; Carnie, Andrew H; Fisher, Muriel; Hammond, Michael.

In: Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.05.2015, p. 197-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{661fd555c9c4431098c1e61ba44562fe,
title = "The aerodynamic puzzle of nasalized fricatives: Aerodynamic and perceptual evidence from Scottish Gaelic",
abstract = "Scottish Gaelic is sometimes described as having nasalized fricatives (/?/distinctively, and [f, x, h], etc. through assimilation). However, there are claims that it is not aerodynamically possible to open the velum for nasalization while maintaining frication noise. We present aerodynamic data from 14 native Scottish Gaelic speakers to determine how the posited nasalized fricatives in this language are realized. Most tokens demonstrate loss of nasalization, but nasalization does occur in some contexts without aerodynamic conflict, e.g., nasalization with the consonant realized as an approximant, nasalization of [h], nasalization on the preceding vowel, or sequential frication and nasalization. Furthermore, a very few tokens do contain simultaneous nasalization and frication with a tradeoff in airflow. We also present perceptual evidence showing that Gaelic listeners can hear this distinction slightly better than chance. Thus, instrumental data from one of the few languages in the world described as having nasalized fricatives confirms that the claimed sounds are not made by producing strong nasalization concurrently with clear frication noise. Furthermore, although speakers most often neutralize the nasalization, when they maintain it, they do so through a variety of phonetic mechanisms, even within a single language.",
keywords = "Airflow, Gaelic, Nasalization, Nasalized fricatives, Perception",
author = "Natasha Warner and Daniel Brenner and Jessamyn Schertz and Carnie, {Andrew H} and Muriel Fisher and Michael Hammond",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/lp-2015-0007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "197--241",
journal = "Laboratory Phonology",
issn = "1868-6346",
publisher = "Ubiquity Press Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The aerodynamic puzzle of nasalized fricatives

T2 - Aerodynamic and perceptual evidence from Scottish Gaelic

AU - Warner, Natasha

AU - Brenner, Daniel

AU - Schertz, Jessamyn

AU - Carnie, Andrew H

AU - Fisher, Muriel

AU - Hammond, Michael

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Scottish Gaelic is sometimes described as having nasalized fricatives (/?/distinctively, and [f, x, h], etc. through assimilation). However, there are claims that it is not aerodynamically possible to open the velum for nasalization while maintaining frication noise. We present aerodynamic data from 14 native Scottish Gaelic speakers to determine how the posited nasalized fricatives in this language are realized. Most tokens demonstrate loss of nasalization, but nasalization does occur in some contexts without aerodynamic conflict, e.g., nasalization with the consonant realized as an approximant, nasalization of [h], nasalization on the preceding vowel, or sequential frication and nasalization. Furthermore, a very few tokens do contain simultaneous nasalization and frication with a tradeoff in airflow. We also present perceptual evidence showing that Gaelic listeners can hear this distinction slightly better than chance. Thus, instrumental data from one of the few languages in the world described as having nasalized fricatives confirms that the claimed sounds are not made by producing strong nasalization concurrently with clear frication noise. Furthermore, although speakers most often neutralize the nasalization, when they maintain it, they do so through a variety of phonetic mechanisms, even within a single language.

AB - Scottish Gaelic is sometimes described as having nasalized fricatives (/?/distinctively, and [f, x, h], etc. through assimilation). However, there are claims that it is not aerodynamically possible to open the velum for nasalization while maintaining frication noise. We present aerodynamic data from 14 native Scottish Gaelic speakers to determine how the posited nasalized fricatives in this language are realized. Most tokens demonstrate loss of nasalization, but nasalization does occur in some contexts without aerodynamic conflict, e.g., nasalization with the consonant realized as an approximant, nasalization of [h], nasalization on the preceding vowel, or sequential frication and nasalization. Furthermore, a very few tokens do contain simultaneous nasalization and frication with a tradeoff in airflow. We also present perceptual evidence showing that Gaelic listeners can hear this distinction slightly better than chance. Thus, instrumental data from one of the few languages in the world described as having nasalized fricatives confirms that the claimed sounds are not made by producing strong nasalization concurrently with clear frication noise. Furthermore, although speakers most often neutralize the nasalization, when they maintain it, they do so through a variety of phonetic mechanisms, even within a single language.

KW - Airflow

KW - Gaelic

KW - Nasalization

KW - Nasalized fricatives

KW - Perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973307776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973307776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/lp-2015-0007

DO - 10.1515/lp-2015-0007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973307776

VL - 6

SP - 197

EP - 241

JO - Laboratory Phonology

JF - Laboratory Phonology

SN - 1868-6346

IS - 2

ER -