The antitrust, discrimination, and malpractice implications of specialization

Daniel A. Krauss, James R Ratner, Bruce D. Sales

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In response to pressure from applied psychologists for the creation of speciality certification boards, professional organizations (e.g., the American Psychological Association and the American Boards of Professional Psychology) have considered and developed specialization and specialty recognition rules. This process may raise potentially serious professional and legal ramifications. Consequently, this article evaluates significant antitrust, discrimination, and malpractice ramifications connected with specialization and specialty recognition within the field of professional psychology. The issues raised in the antitrust and discrimination sections of the article affect the very creation of specialty boards, whereas the issue raised in the malpractice section may strongly affect the individual practitioner who becomes board certified. The overarching purpose of this article is to assess and explain the legal implications raised, to predict, where possible, the legal treatment of particular specialization-related behavior, and to warn about possible legal pitfalls and liabilities. Our goal is to arm specialization activity with foresight, so that this inevitable activity can be formulated responsibly by practitioners, specialty organizations, and patient/consumers, in a direction useful both for psychology and society.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-33
Number of pages19
JournalApplied and Preventive Psychology
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Psychology
Consumer Organizations
Specialty Boards
Legal Liability
Certification
Pressure
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Antitrust
  • Discrimination
  • Law
  • Malpractice
  • Specialization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The antitrust, discrimination, and malpractice implications of specialization. / Krauss, Daniel A.; Ratner, James R; Sales, Bruce D.

In: Applied and Preventive Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1997, p. 15-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e43d048918f249a6a49f4ee6b14f68b5,
title = "The antitrust, discrimination, and malpractice implications of specialization",
abstract = "In response to pressure from applied psychologists for the creation of speciality certification boards, professional organizations (e.g., the American Psychological Association and the American Boards of Professional Psychology) have considered and developed specialization and specialty recognition rules. This process may raise potentially serious professional and legal ramifications. Consequently, this article evaluates significant antitrust, discrimination, and malpractice ramifications connected with specialization and specialty recognition within the field of professional psychology. The issues raised in the antitrust and discrimination sections of the article affect the very creation of specialty boards, whereas the issue raised in the malpractice section may strongly affect the individual practitioner who becomes board certified. The overarching purpose of this article is to assess and explain the legal implications raised, to predict, where possible, the legal treatment of particular specialization-related behavior, and to warn about possible legal pitfalls and liabilities. Our goal is to arm specialization activity with foresight, so that this inevitable activity can be formulated responsibly by practitioners, specialty organizations, and patient/consumers, in a direction useful both for psychology and society.",
keywords = "Antitrust, Discrimination, Law, Malpractice, Specialization",
author = "Krauss, {Daniel A.} and Ratner, {James R} and Sales, {Bruce D.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "15--33",
journal = "Applied and Preventive Psychology",
issn = "0962-1849",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The antitrust, discrimination, and malpractice implications of specialization

AU - Krauss, Daniel A.

AU - Ratner, James R

AU - Sales, Bruce D.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - In response to pressure from applied psychologists for the creation of speciality certification boards, professional organizations (e.g., the American Psychological Association and the American Boards of Professional Psychology) have considered and developed specialization and specialty recognition rules. This process may raise potentially serious professional and legal ramifications. Consequently, this article evaluates significant antitrust, discrimination, and malpractice ramifications connected with specialization and specialty recognition within the field of professional psychology. The issues raised in the antitrust and discrimination sections of the article affect the very creation of specialty boards, whereas the issue raised in the malpractice section may strongly affect the individual practitioner who becomes board certified. The overarching purpose of this article is to assess and explain the legal implications raised, to predict, where possible, the legal treatment of particular specialization-related behavior, and to warn about possible legal pitfalls and liabilities. Our goal is to arm specialization activity with foresight, so that this inevitable activity can be formulated responsibly by practitioners, specialty organizations, and patient/consumers, in a direction useful both for psychology and society.

AB - In response to pressure from applied psychologists for the creation of speciality certification boards, professional organizations (e.g., the American Psychological Association and the American Boards of Professional Psychology) have considered and developed specialization and specialty recognition rules. This process may raise potentially serious professional and legal ramifications. Consequently, this article evaluates significant antitrust, discrimination, and malpractice ramifications connected with specialization and specialty recognition within the field of professional psychology. The issues raised in the antitrust and discrimination sections of the article affect the very creation of specialty boards, whereas the issue raised in the malpractice section may strongly affect the individual practitioner who becomes board certified. The overarching purpose of this article is to assess and explain the legal implications raised, to predict, where possible, the legal treatment of particular specialization-related behavior, and to warn about possible legal pitfalls and liabilities. Our goal is to arm specialization activity with foresight, so that this inevitable activity can be formulated responsibly by practitioners, specialty organizations, and patient/consumers, in a direction useful both for psychology and society.

KW - Antitrust

KW - Discrimination

KW - Law

KW - Malpractice

KW - Specialization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031532744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031532744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 15

EP - 33

JO - Applied and Preventive Psychology

JF - Applied and Preventive Psychology

SN - 0962-1849

IS - 1

ER -