The attrition game: Initial resources, initial contests and the exit of candidates during the US presidential primary season

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

In contests for the presidential nominations from the Democratic and Republican parties in the United States, the duration of candidacies determines both the winning candidate (i.e., the one who outlasts his or her opponents) and the amount of intraparty conflict before the nomination is bestowed. This article analyses how strategic considerations lead some candidates to exit the race more quickly than others. Factors which could shape such strategic considerations include initial candidate assets and characteristics (national poll standings, fund-raising totals and occupational background), initial contest outcomes (Iowa and New Hampshire) and structural variables (proportional representation delegate distribution rules, party, front-loaded calendar). Results from a duration model indicate that poll standings, money (in a curvilinear pattern), New Hampshire and Iowa results, occupational backgrounds and the front-loading of the primary calendar shaped the length of candidacies for presidential contestants from 1980 to 2004. Candidates lacking in initial assets or early victories leave the nomination race in a process most resembling a game of attrition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-507
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The attrition game: Initial resources, initial contests and the exit of candidates during the US presidential primary season'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this