The auditory brainstem response: Latencies obtained in children while under general anesthesia

Linda W Norrix, Stacey Trepanier, Matthew Atlas, Darlyne Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) test is frequently employed to estimate hearing sensitivity and assess the integrity of the ascending auditory system. In persons who cannot participate in conventional tests of hearing, a short-acting general anesthetic is used, recordings are obtained, and the results are compared with normative data. However, several factors (e.g., anesthesia, temperature changes) can contribute to delayed absolute and interpeak latencies, making it difficult to evaluate the integrity of the person's auditory brainstem function. Purpose: In this study, we investigated the latencies of ABR responses in children who received general anesthesia. Research Design: Between subject. Study Sample: Twelve children between the ages of 29 and 52 mo, most of whom exhibited a developmental delay but normal peripheral auditory function, comprised the anesthesia group. Twelve participants between the ages of 13 and 26 yr with normal hearing thresholds comprised the control group. Data Collection and Analysis: ABRs from a single ear from children, recorded under general anesthesia, were retrospectively analyzed and compared to those obtained from a control group with no anesthesia. ABRs were generated using 80 dB nHL rarefaction click stimuli. T-tests, corrected for alpha slippage, were employed to examine latency differences between groups. Results: There were significant delays in latencies for children evaluated under general anesthesia compared to the control group. Delays were observed forwave V and the interpeak intervals I-III, III-V, and I-V. Conclusions: Our data suggest that caution is needed in interpreting neural function from ABR data recorded while a child is under general anesthesia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-63
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
General Anesthesia
Reaction Time
Anesthesia
Control Groups
Hearing
Hearing Tests
General Anesthetics
Brain Stem
Ear
Research Design
Temperature

Keywords

  • ABR
  • Children
  • General anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

The auditory brainstem response : Latencies obtained in children while under general anesthesia. / Norrix, Linda W; Trepanier, Stacey; Atlas, Matthew; Kim, Darlyne.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 57-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{060fd427ab944c84be64537aaf1fb53c,
title = "The auditory brainstem response: Latencies obtained in children while under general anesthesia",
abstract = "Background: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) test is frequently employed to estimate hearing sensitivity and assess the integrity of the ascending auditory system. In persons who cannot participate in conventional tests of hearing, a short-acting general anesthetic is used, recordings are obtained, and the results are compared with normative data. However, several factors (e.g., anesthesia, temperature changes) can contribute to delayed absolute and interpeak latencies, making it difficult to evaluate the integrity of the person's auditory brainstem function. Purpose: In this study, we investigated the latencies of ABR responses in children who received general anesthesia. Research Design: Between subject. Study Sample: Twelve children between the ages of 29 and 52 mo, most of whom exhibited a developmental delay but normal peripheral auditory function, comprised the anesthesia group. Twelve participants between the ages of 13 and 26 yr with normal hearing thresholds comprised the control group. Data Collection and Analysis: ABRs from a single ear from children, recorded under general anesthesia, were retrospectively analyzed and compared to those obtained from a control group with no anesthesia. ABRs were generated using 80 dB nHL rarefaction click stimuli. T-tests, corrected for alpha slippage, were employed to examine latency differences between groups. Results: There were significant delays in latencies for children evaluated under general anesthesia compared to the control group. Delays were observed forwave V and the interpeak intervals I-III, III-V, and I-V. Conclusions: Our data suggest that caution is needed in interpreting neural function from ABR data recorded while a child is under general anesthesia.",
keywords = "ABR, Children, General anesthesia",
author = "Norrix, {Linda W} and Stacey Trepanier and Matthew Atlas and Darlyne Kim",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3766/jaaa.23.1.6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "57--63",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology",
issn = "1050-0545",
publisher = "American Academy of Audiology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The auditory brainstem response

T2 - Latencies obtained in children while under general anesthesia

AU - Norrix, Linda W

AU - Trepanier, Stacey

AU - Atlas, Matthew

AU - Kim, Darlyne

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Background: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) test is frequently employed to estimate hearing sensitivity and assess the integrity of the ascending auditory system. In persons who cannot participate in conventional tests of hearing, a short-acting general anesthetic is used, recordings are obtained, and the results are compared with normative data. However, several factors (e.g., anesthesia, temperature changes) can contribute to delayed absolute and interpeak latencies, making it difficult to evaluate the integrity of the person's auditory brainstem function. Purpose: In this study, we investigated the latencies of ABR responses in children who received general anesthesia. Research Design: Between subject. Study Sample: Twelve children between the ages of 29 and 52 mo, most of whom exhibited a developmental delay but normal peripheral auditory function, comprised the anesthesia group. Twelve participants between the ages of 13 and 26 yr with normal hearing thresholds comprised the control group. Data Collection and Analysis: ABRs from a single ear from children, recorded under general anesthesia, were retrospectively analyzed and compared to those obtained from a control group with no anesthesia. ABRs were generated using 80 dB nHL rarefaction click stimuli. T-tests, corrected for alpha slippage, were employed to examine latency differences between groups. Results: There were significant delays in latencies for children evaluated under general anesthesia compared to the control group. Delays were observed forwave V and the interpeak intervals I-III, III-V, and I-V. Conclusions: Our data suggest that caution is needed in interpreting neural function from ABR data recorded while a child is under general anesthesia.

AB - Background: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) test is frequently employed to estimate hearing sensitivity and assess the integrity of the ascending auditory system. In persons who cannot participate in conventional tests of hearing, a short-acting general anesthetic is used, recordings are obtained, and the results are compared with normative data. However, several factors (e.g., anesthesia, temperature changes) can contribute to delayed absolute and interpeak latencies, making it difficult to evaluate the integrity of the person's auditory brainstem function. Purpose: In this study, we investigated the latencies of ABR responses in children who received general anesthesia. Research Design: Between subject. Study Sample: Twelve children between the ages of 29 and 52 mo, most of whom exhibited a developmental delay but normal peripheral auditory function, comprised the anesthesia group. Twelve participants between the ages of 13 and 26 yr with normal hearing thresholds comprised the control group. Data Collection and Analysis: ABRs from a single ear from children, recorded under general anesthesia, were retrospectively analyzed and compared to those obtained from a control group with no anesthesia. ABRs were generated using 80 dB nHL rarefaction click stimuli. T-tests, corrected for alpha slippage, were employed to examine latency differences between groups. Results: There were significant delays in latencies for children evaluated under general anesthesia compared to the control group. Delays were observed forwave V and the interpeak intervals I-III, III-V, and I-V. Conclusions: Our data suggest that caution is needed in interpreting neural function from ABR data recorded while a child is under general anesthesia.

KW - ABR

KW - Children

KW - General anesthesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863082825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863082825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3766/jaaa.23.1.6

DO - 10.3766/jaaa.23.1.6

M3 - Article

C2 - 22284841

AN - SCOPUS:84863082825

VL - 23

SP - 57

EP - 63

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

SN - 1050-0545

IS - 1

ER -