The awkward adolescence of archaeological science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rapid growth of archaeological science (and of the Journal of Archaeological Science) over the last 15 years has changed archaeology worldwide. New methods of analysis have allowed archaeologists to pose many new questions, and have made it possible to revisit many old ones. In spite of its many successes, archaeological science is not yet a mature field of science, for it has yet to attract adequate funding, has not solved the problem of how to reproduce itself (issues of training and employment), and still struggles with quality control. These are however all problems of archaeological science in rich nations. Looking beyond these, a particularly troubling issue is the growing inequality of access to archaeological science. Archaeologists in poorer nations are often aware of the growing importance of scientific techniques in archaeological research, but cannot obtain access to them. Archaeological scientists also need to be aware of potential political sensitivity of their work, and to work to build trust.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)242-247
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

adolescence
science
quality control
archaeology
Archaeological Science
Adolescence
funding
Archaeologists
Archaeology

Keywords

  • Archaeological science
  • Archaeometry
  • Employment
  • Funding
  • Quality control
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Archaeology

Cite this

The awkward adolescence of archaeological science. / Killick, David J.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2015, p. 242-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da4cad3a1b5d42a3bb205a06eb097fc7,
title = "The awkward adolescence of archaeological science",
abstract = "The rapid growth of archaeological science (and of the Journal of Archaeological Science) over the last 15 years has changed archaeology worldwide. New methods of analysis have allowed archaeologists to pose many new questions, and have made it possible to revisit many old ones. In spite of its many successes, archaeological science is not yet a mature field of science, for it has yet to attract adequate funding, has not solved the problem of how to reproduce itself (issues of training and employment), and still struggles with quality control. These are however all problems of archaeological science in rich nations. Looking beyond these, a particularly troubling issue is the growing inequality of access to archaeological science. Archaeologists in poorer nations are often aware of the growing importance of scientific techniques in archaeological research, but cannot obtain access to them. Archaeological scientists also need to be aware of potential political sensitivity of their work, and to work to build trust.",
keywords = "Archaeological science, Archaeometry, Employment, Funding, Quality control, Training",
author = "Killick, {David J}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.jas.2015.01.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "242--247",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science",
issn = "0305-4403",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The awkward adolescence of archaeological science

AU - Killick, David J

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The rapid growth of archaeological science (and of the Journal of Archaeological Science) over the last 15 years has changed archaeology worldwide. New methods of analysis have allowed archaeologists to pose many new questions, and have made it possible to revisit many old ones. In spite of its many successes, archaeological science is not yet a mature field of science, for it has yet to attract adequate funding, has not solved the problem of how to reproduce itself (issues of training and employment), and still struggles with quality control. These are however all problems of archaeological science in rich nations. Looking beyond these, a particularly troubling issue is the growing inequality of access to archaeological science. Archaeologists in poorer nations are often aware of the growing importance of scientific techniques in archaeological research, but cannot obtain access to them. Archaeological scientists also need to be aware of potential political sensitivity of their work, and to work to build trust.

AB - The rapid growth of archaeological science (and of the Journal of Archaeological Science) over the last 15 years has changed archaeology worldwide. New methods of analysis have allowed archaeologists to pose many new questions, and have made it possible to revisit many old ones. In spite of its many successes, archaeological science is not yet a mature field of science, for it has yet to attract adequate funding, has not solved the problem of how to reproduce itself (issues of training and employment), and still struggles with quality control. These are however all problems of archaeological science in rich nations. Looking beyond these, a particularly troubling issue is the growing inequality of access to archaeological science. Archaeologists in poorer nations are often aware of the growing importance of scientific techniques in archaeological research, but cannot obtain access to them. Archaeological scientists also need to be aware of potential political sensitivity of their work, and to work to build trust.

KW - Archaeological science

KW - Archaeometry

KW - Employment

KW - Funding

KW - Quality control

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930616078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930616078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jas.2015.01.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jas.2015.01.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930616078

VL - 56

SP - 242

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science

SN - 0305-4403

IS - 1

ER -