The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant?

Judith L Bronstein, Jessica L. Barker, Elinor M. Lichtenberg, Leif L. Richardson, Rebecca E. Irwin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How do animals forage for variable food resources? For animals foraging at flowers, floral constancy has provided a framework for understanding why organisms visit some flowers while bypassing others. We extend this framework to the flower-handling tactics that visitors employ. Nectar robbers remove nectar through holes bitten in flowers, often without pollinating. Many foragers can switch between robbing and visiting flowers legitimately to gain access to nectar. We document that even though individuals can switch foraging tactics, they often do not. We explore whether individuals exhibit constancy to either robbing or visiting legitimately, which we term tactic constancy. We then extend hypotheses of floral constancy to understand when and why visitors exhibit tactic constancy and raise questions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-18
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Insect Science
Volume21
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

nectar robbing
robbing
behavioral ecology
constancy
nectar
flower
flowers
ecology
foraging
flower visiting
animal
forage
pollination
animals
food
organisms
resource

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Insect Science

Cite this

The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing : why be tactic constant? / Bronstein, Judith L; Barker, Jessica L.; Lichtenberg, Elinor M.; Richardson, Leif L.; Irwin, Rebecca E.

In: Current Opinion in Insect Science, Vol. 21, 01.06.2017, p. 14-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Bronstein, Judith L ; Barker, Jessica L. ; Lichtenberg, Elinor M. ; Richardson, Leif L. ; Irwin, Rebecca E. / The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing : why be tactic constant?. In: Current Opinion in Insect Science. 2017 ; Vol. 21. pp. 14-18.
@article{3c37537831d54ece9944cdfca1a53027,
title = "The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant?",
abstract = "How do animals forage for variable food resources? For animals foraging at flowers, floral constancy has provided a framework for understanding why organisms visit some flowers while bypassing others. We extend this framework to the flower-handling tactics that visitors employ. Nectar robbers remove nectar through holes bitten in flowers, often without pollinating. Many foragers can switch between robbing and visiting flowers legitimately to gain access to nectar. We document that even though individuals can switch foraging tactics, they often do not. We explore whether individuals exhibit constancy to either robbing or visiting legitimately, which we term tactic constancy. We then extend hypotheses of floral constancy to understand when and why visitors exhibit tactic constancy and raise questions for future research.",
author = "Bronstein, {Judith L} and Barker, {Jessica L.} and Lichtenberg, {Elinor M.} and Richardson, {Leif L.} and Irwin, {Rebecca E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "14--18",
journal = "Current Opinion in Insect Science",
issn = "2214-5745",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing

T2 - why be tactic constant?

AU - Bronstein, Judith L

AU - Barker, Jessica L.

AU - Lichtenberg, Elinor M.

AU - Richardson, Leif L.

AU - Irwin, Rebecca E.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - How do animals forage for variable food resources? For animals foraging at flowers, floral constancy has provided a framework for understanding why organisms visit some flowers while bypassing others. We extend this framework to the flower-handling tactics that visitors employ. Nectar robbers remove nectar through holes bitten in flowers, often without pollinating. Many foragers can switch between robbing and visiting flowers legitimately to gain access to nectar. We document that even though individuals can switch foraging tactics, they often do not. We explore whether individuals exhibit constancy to either robbing or visiting legitimately, which we term tactic constancy. We then extend hypotheses of floral constancy to understand when and why visitors exhibit tactic constancy and raise questions for future research.

AB - How do animals forage for variable food resources? For animals foraging at flowers, floral constancy has provided a framework for understanding why organisms visit some flowers while bypassing others. We extend this framework to the flower-handling tactics that visitors employ. Nectar robbers remove nectar through holes bitten in flowers, often without pollinating. Many foragers can switch between robbing and visiting flowers legitimately to gain access to nectar. We document that even though individuals can switch foraging tactics, they often do not. We explore whether individuals exhibit constancy to either robbing or visiting legitimately, which we term tactic constancy. We then extend hypotheses of floral constancy to understand when and why visitors exhibit tactic constancy and raise questions for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020026571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020026571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.013

DO - 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.013

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28822483

AN - SCOPUS:85020026571

VL - 21

SP - 14

EP - 18

JO - Current Opinion in Insect Science

JF - Current Opinion in Insect Science

SN - 2214-5745

ER -