The BIG (brain injury guidelines) project: Defining the management of traumatic brain injury by acute care surgeons

Bellal A Joseph, Randall S Friese, Moutamn Sadoun, Hassan Aziz, Narong Kulvatunyou, Viraj Pandit, Julie Wynne, Andrew - Tang, Terence S Okeeffe, Peter M Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is becoming a standard practice that any "positive" identification of a radiographic intracranial injury requires transfer of the patient to a trauma center for observation and repeat head computed tomography (RHCT). The purpose of this study was to define guidelines - based on each patient's history, physical examination, and initial head CT findings - regarding which patients require a period of observation, RHCT, or neurosurgical consultation. Methods: In our retrospective cohort analysis, we reviewed the records of 3,803 blunt traumatic brain injury patients during a 4-year period. We classified patients according to neurologic examination results, use of intoxicants, anticoagulation status, and initial head CT findings. We then developed brain injury guidelines (BIG) based on the individual patient's need for observation or hospitalization, RHCT, or neurosurgical consultation. Results: A total of 1,232 patients had an abnormal head CT finding. In the BIG 1 category, no patients worsened clinically or radiographically or required any intervention. BIG 2 category had radiographic worsening in 2.6% of the patients. All patients who required neurosurgical intervention (13%) were in BIG 3. There was excellent agreement between assigned BIG and verified BIG. κ statistic is equal to 0.98. Conclusion: We have proposed BIG based on patient's history, neurologic examination, and findings of initial head CT scan. These guidelines must be used as supplement to good clinical examination while managing patients with traumatic brain injury. Prospective validation of the BIG is warranted before its widespread implementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)965-969
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume76
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Brain Injuries
Guidelines
Head
Tomography
Neurologic Examination
Observation
Traumatic Brain Injury
Surgeons
Referral and Consultation
Patient Transfer
Trauma Centers
Neurologic Manifestations
Physical Examination
Epidemiologic Studies
Hospitalization
Cohort Studies
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • acute care surgeons;repeat head computed tomography
  • guidelines for management of traumatic brain injury
  • neurosurgical consultation
  • Traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

The BIG (brain injury guidelines) project : Defining the management of traumatic brain injury by acute care surgeons. / Joseph, Bellal A; Friese, Randall S; Sadoun, Moutamn; Aziz, Hassan; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Pandit, Viraj; Wynne, Julie; Tang, Andrew -; Okeeffe, Terence S; Rhee, Peter M.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 76, No. 4, 2014, p. 965-969.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e2a329c034f4536b462b0ecde048bb1,
title = "The BIG (brain injury guidelines) project: Defining the management of traumatic brain injury by acute care surgeons",
abstract = "Background: It is becoming a standard practice that any {"}positive{"} identification of a radiographic intracranial injury requires transfer of the patient to a trauma center for observation and repeat head computed tomography (RHCT). The purpose of this study was to define guidelines - based on each patient's history, physical examination, and initial head CT findings - regarding which patients require a period of observation, RHCT, or neurosurgical consultation. Methods: In our retrospective cohort analysis, we reviewed the records of 3,803 blunt traumatic brain injury patients during a 4-year period. We classified patients according to neurologic examination results, use of intoxicants, anticoagulation status, and initial head CT findings. We then developed brain injury guidelines (BIG) based on the individual patient's need for observation or hospitalization, RHCT, or neurosurgical consultation. Results: A total of 1,232 patients had an abnormal head CT finding. In the BIG 1 category, no patients worsened clinically or radiographically or required any intervention. BIG 2 category had radiographic worsening in 2.6{\%} of the patients. All patients who required neurosurgical intervention (13{\%}) were in BIG 3. There was excellent agreement between assigned BIG and verified BIG. κ statistic is equal to 0.98. Conclusion: We have proposed BIG based on patient's history, neurologic examination, and findings of initial head CT scan. These guidelines must be used as supplement to good clinical examination while managing patients with traumatic brain injury. Prospective validation of the BIG is warranted before its widespread implementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.",
keywords = "acute care surgeons;repeat head computed tomography, guidelines for management of traumatic brain injury, neurosurgical consultation, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Joseph, {Bellal A} and Friese, {Randall S} and Moutamn Sadoun and Hassan Aziz and Narong Kulvatunyou and Viraj Pandit and Julie Wynne and Tang, {Andrew -} and Okeeffe, {Terence S} and Rhee, {Peter M}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000000161",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "965--969",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The BIG (brain injury guidelines) project

T2 - Defining the management of traumatic brain injury by acute care surgeons

AU - Joseph, Bellal A

AU - Friese, Randall S

AU - Sadoun, Moutamn

AU - Aziz, Hassan

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Pandit, Viraj

AU - Wynne, Julie

AU - Tang, Andrew -

AU - Okeeffe, Terence S

AU - Rhee, Peter M

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: It is becoming a standard practice that any "positive" identification of a radiographic intracranial injury requires transfer of the patient to a trauma center for observation and repeat head computed tomography (RHCT). The purpose of this study was to define guidelines - based on each patient's history, physical examination, and initial head CT findings - regarding which patients require a period of observation, RHCT, or neurosurgical consultation. Methods: In our retrospective cohort analysis, we reviewed the records of 3,803 blunt traumatic brain injury patients during a 4-year period. We classified patients according to neurologic examination results, use of intoxicants, anticoagulation status, and initial head CT findings. We then developed brain injury guidelines (BIG) based on the individual patient's need for observation or hospitalization, RHCT, or neurosurgical consultation. Results: A total of 1,232 patients had an abnormal head CT finding. In the BIG 1 category, no patients worsened clinically or radiographically or required any intervention. BIG 2 category had radiographic worsening in 2.6% of the patients. All patients who required neurosurgical intervention (13%) were in BIG 3. There was excellent agreement between assigned BIG and verified BIG. κ statistic is equal to 0.98. Conclusion: We have proposed BIG based on patient's history, neurologic examination, and findings of initial head CT scan. These guidelines must be used as supplement to good clinical examination while managing patients with traumatic brain injury. Prospective validation of the BIG is warranted before its widespread implementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.

AB - Background: It is becoming a standard practice that any "positive" identification of a radiographic intracranial injury requires transfer of the patient to a trauma center for observation and repeat head computed tomography (RHCT). The purpose of this study was to define guidelines - based on each patient's history, physical examination, and initial head CT findings - regarding which patients require a period of observation, RHCT, or neurosurgical consultation. Methods: In our retrospective cohort analysis, we reviewed the records of 3,803 blunt traumatic brain injury patients during a 4-year period. We classified patients according to neurologic examination results, use of intoxicants, anticoagulation status, and initial head CT findings. We then developed brain injury guidelines (BIG) based on the individual patient's need for observation or hospitalization, RHCT, or neurosurgical consultation. Results: A total of 1,232 patients had an abnormal head CT finding. In the BIG 1 category, no patients worsened clinically or radiographically or required any intervention. BIG 2 category had radiographic worsening in 2.6% of the patients. All patients who required neurosurgical intervention (13%) were in BIG 3. There was excellent agreement between assigned BIG and verified BIG. κ statistic is equal to 0.98. Conclusion: We have proposed BIG based on patient's history, neurologic examination, and findings of initial head CT scan. These guidelines must be used as supplement to good clinical examination while managing patients with traumatic brain injury. Prospective validation of the BIG is warranted before its widespread implementation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.

KW - acute care surgeons;repeat head computed tomography

KW - guidelines for management of traumatic brain injury

KW - neurosurgical consultation

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897089093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897089093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000161

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000161

M3 - Article

C2 - 24662858

AN - SCOPUS:84897089093

VL - 76

SP - 965

EP - 969

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -