The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution

Ofer Bar-Yosef, Steven L Kuhn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

232 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the rapid expansion of archaeological knowledge of the Paleolithic over the past several decades, some generalized interpretive frameworks inherited from previous generations of researchers are remarkably tenacious. One of the most persistent of these is the assumed correlation between blade technologies, Upper Paleolithic industries, and anatomically (and behaviorally) modern humans. In this paper, we review some of the evidence for the production of early blade technologies in Eurasia and Africa dating to the late Lower and the Middle Paleolithic. The basic techniques for blade production appeared thousands of years before the Upper Paleolithic, and there is no justification for linking blades per se to any particular aspect of hominid anatomy or to any major change in the behavioral capacities of hominids. It is true that blades came to dominate the archaeological records of western Eurasia and Africa after 40,000 years ago, perhaps as a consequence of increasing reliance on complex composite tools during the Upper Paleolithic. At the same time, evidence from other regions of the world demonstrates that evolutionary trends in Pleistocene Eurasia were historically contingent and not universal. [Middle Paleolithic, Upper Paleolithic, blade technology, human evolution, hominid behavior and capacities].

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)322-338
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Anthropologist
Volume101
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

evidence
industry
trend
Blade
Human Evolution
Upper Paleolithic
Eurasia
Hominids
Middle Palaeolithic
Africa
Contingent
Industry
Pleistocene
Modern Humans
Archaeological Record
Justification
Blade Production
Palaeolithic
Archaeology
Reliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

The big deal about blades : Laminar technologies and human evolution. / Bar-Yosef, Ofer; Kuhn, Steven L.

In: American Anthropologist, Vol. 101, No. 2, 06.1999, p. 322-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf45301cb51d438aa0ec91cf024c8eeb,
title = "The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution",
abstract = "Despite the rapid expansion of archaeological knowledge of the Paleolithic over the past several decades, some generalized interpretive frameworks inherited from previous generations of researchers are remarkably tenacious. One of the most persistent of these is the assumed correlation between blade technologies, Upper Paleolithic industries, and anatomically (and behaviorally) modern humans. In this paper, we review some of the evidence for the production of early blade technologies in Eurasia and Africa dating to the late Lower and the Middle Paleolithic. The basic techniques for blade production appeared thousands of years before the Upper Paleolithic, and there is no justification for linking blades per se to any particular aspect of hominid anatomy or to any major change in the behavioral capacities of hominids. It is true that blades came to dominate the archaeological records of western Eurasia and Africa after 40,000 years ago, perhaps as a consequence of increasing reliance on complex composite tools during the Upper Paleolithic. At the same time, evidence from other regions of the world demonstrates that evolutionary trends in Pleistocene Eurasia were historically contingent and not universal. [Middle Paleolithic, Upper Paleolithic, blade technology, human evolution, hominid behavior and capacities].",
author = "Ofer Bar-Yosef and Kuhn, {Steven L}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "322--338",
journal = "American Anthropologist",
issn = "1548-1433",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The big deal about blades

T2 - Laminar technologies and human evolution

AU - Bar-Yosef, Ofer

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - Despite the rapid expansion of archaeological knowledge of the Paleolithic over the past several decades, some generalized interpretive frameworks inherited from previous generations of researchers are remarkably tenacious. One of the most persistent of these is the assumed correlation between blade technologies, Upper Paleolithic industries, and anatomically (and behaviorally) modern humans. In this paper, we review some of the evidence for the production of early blade technologies in Eurasia and Africa dating to the late Lower and the Middle Paleolithic. The basic techniques for blade production appeared thousands of years before the Upper Paleolithic, and there is no justification for linking blades per se to any particular aspect of hominid anatomy or to any major change in the behavioral capacities of hominids. It is true that blades came to dominate the archaeological records of western Eurasia and Africa after 40,000 years ago, perhaps as a consequence of increasing reliance on complex composite tools during the Upper Paleolithic. At the same time, evidence from other regions of the world demonstrates that evolutionary trends in Pleistocene Eurasia were historically contingent and not universal. [Middle Paleolithic, Upper Paleolithic, blade technology, human evolution, hominid behavior and capacities].

AB - Despite the rapid expansion of archaeological knowledge of the Paleolithic over the past several decades, some generalized interpretive frameworks inherited from previous generations of researchers are remarkably tenacious. One of the most persistent of these is the assumed correlation between blade technologies, Upper Paleolithic industries, and anatomically (and behaviorally) modern humans. In this paper, we review some of the evidence for the production of early blade technologies in Eurasia and Africa dating to the late Lower and the Middle Paleolithic. The basic techniques for blade production appeared thousands of years before the Upper Paleolithic, and there is no justification for linking blades per se to any particular aspect of hominid anatomy or to any major change in the behavioral capacities of hominids. It is true that blades came to dominate the archaeological records of western Eurasia and Africa after 40,000 years ago, perhaps as a consequence of increasing reliance on complex composite tools during the Upper Paleolithic. At the same time, evidence from other regions of the world demonstrates that evolutionary trends in Pleistocene Eurasia were historically contingent and not universal. [Middle Paleolithic, Upper Paleolithic, blade technology, human evolution, hominid behavior and capacities].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033407794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033407794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033407794

VL - 101

SP - 322

EP - 338

JO - American Anthropologist

JF - American Anthropologist

SN - 1548-1433

IS - 2

ER -