The changing dynamics of senate voting on supreme court nominees

Lee Epstein, René Lindstädt, Jeffrey A. Segal, Chad L Westerland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A near-universal consensus exists that the nomination of Robert Bork in 1987 triggered a new regime in the Senate's voting over presidential nominees - a regime that deemphasizes ethics, competence, and integrity and stresses instead politics, philosophy, and ideology. Nonetheless, this conventional wisdom remains largely untested. In this paper we explore the extent to which the Bork nomination has affected the decisions of U.S. senators. To do so, we modernize, update, and backdate the standard account of confirmation politics offered by Cameron, Cover, and Segal (1990) to cover all candidates for the Supreme Court from Hugo L. Black in 1937 through John G. Roberts, Jr. in 2005. Our results confirm conventional wisdom about the Bork nomination but with two notable caveats. First, while the importance of ideology has reached new heights, the Senate's emphasis on this factor had its genesis some three decades earlier, in the 1950s. Second, while ideology is of paramount concern to senators, a candidate's professional merit also remains a significant determinant of success in the Senate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-307
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

senate
voting
Supreme Court
ideology
wisdom
candidacy
regime
politics
integrity
moral philosophy
determinants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The changing dynamics of senate voting on supreme court nominees. / Epstein, Lee; Lindstädt, René; Segal, Jeffrey A.; Westerland, Chad L.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 68, No. 2, 05.2006, p. 296-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Epstein, Lee ; Lindstädt, René ; Segal, Jeffrey A. ; Westerland, Chad L. / The changing dynamics of senate voting on supreme court nominees. In: Journal of Politics. 2006 ; Vol. 68, No. 2. pp. 296-307.
@article{645eedf5f9cb4599bccaa0c6c6efbd84,
title = "The changing dynamics of senate voting on supreme court nominees",
abstract = "A near-universal consensus exists that the nomination of Robert Bork in 1987 triggered a new regime in the Senate's voting over presidential nominees - a regime that deemphasizes ethics, competence, and integrity and stresses instead politics, philosophy, and ideology. Nonetheless, this conventional wisdom remains largely untested. In this paper we explore the extent to which the Bork nomination has affected the decisions of U.S. senators. To do so, we modernize, update, and backdate the standard account of confirmation politics offered by Cameron, Cover, and Segal (1990) to cover all candidates for the Supreme Court from Hugo L. Black in 1937 through John G. Roberts, Jr. in 2005. Our results confirm conventional wisdom about the Bork nomination but with two notable caveats. First, while the importance of ideology has reached new heights, the Senate's emphasis on this factor had its genesis some three decades earlier, in the 1950s. Second, while ideology is of paramount concern to senators, a candidate's professional merit also remains a significant determinant of success in the Senate.",
author = "Lee Epstein and Ren{\'e} Lindst{\"a}dt and Segal, {Jeffrey A.} and Westerland, {Chad L}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00407.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "296--307",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The changing dynamics of senate voting on supreme court nominees

AU - Epstein, Lee

AU - Lindstädt, René

AU - Segal, Jeffrey A.

AU - Westerland, Chad L

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - A near-universal consensus exists that the nomination of Robert Bork in 1987 triggered a new regime in the Senate's voting over presidential nominees - a regime that deemphasizes ethics, competence, and integrity and stresses instead politics, philosophy, and ideology. Nonetheless, this conventional wisdom remains largely untested. In this paper we explore the extent to which the Bork nomination has affected the decisions of U.S. senators. To do so, we modernize, update, and backdate the standard account of confirmation politics offered by Cameron, Cover, and Segal (1990) to cover all candidates for the Supreme Court from Hugo L. Black in 1937 through John G. Roberts, Jr. in 2005. Our results confirm conventional wisdom about the Bork nomination but with two notable caveats. First, while the importance of ideology has reached new heights, the Senate's emphasis on this factor had its genesis some three decades earlier, in the 1950s. Second, while ideology is of paramount concern to senators, a candidate's professional merit also remains a significant determinant of success in the Senate.

AB - A near-universal consensus exists that the nomination of Robert Bork in 1987 triggered a new regime in the Senate's voting over presidential nominees - a regime that deemphasizes ethics, competence, and integrity and stresses instead politics, philosophy, and ideology. Nonetheless, this conventional wisdom remains largely untested. In this paper we explore the extent to which the Bork nomination has affected the decisions of U.S. senators. To do so, we modernize, update, and backdate the standard account of confirmation politics offered by Cameron, Cover, and Segal (1990) to cover all candidates for the Supreme Court from Hugo L. Black in 1937 through John G. Roberts, Jr. in 2005. Our results confirm conventional wisdom about the Bork nomination but with two notable caveats. First, while the importance of ideology has reached new heights, the Senate's emphasis on this factor had its genesis some three decades earlier, in the 1950s. Second, while ideology is of paramount concern to senators, a candidate's professional merit also remains a significant determinant of success in the Senate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646337192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646337192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00407.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00407.x

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 296

EP - 307

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 2

ER -