The commitment effect versus information effect of disclosure-evidence from smaller reporting companies

Lin Cheng, Scott Liao, Haiwen Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examine the commitment effect provided by mandatory disclosure and the information effect of voluntary disclosure on market illiquidity by exploring a regulatory change that allows smaller reporting companies to reduce the disclosure of certain information in their SEC filings. This regime change allows us to separate the commitment effect provided by mandatory disclosure from the information effect of voluntary disclosure. We find that firms that are eligible to reduce their disclosure, but voluntarily maintain their disclosure level, experience an increase in market illiquidity. We also find that the increase in illiquidity is more pronounced for firms with higher agency costs. These findings suggest that mandatory disclosure serves as a credible commitment mechanism and that losing such commitment by disclosure deregulation is costly in the absence of a loss of information. Our study suggests that while voluntary disclosure is effective in reducing information asymmetry, it cannot replace mandatory disclosure in addressing information problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1239-1263
Number of pages25
JournalAccounting Review
Volume88
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Keywords

  • Commitment effect
  • Disclosure
  • Market liquidity
  • Smaller reporting companies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The commitment effect versus information effect of disclosure-evidence from smaller reporting companies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this