The comparison of high definition versus stereoscopic display on standardized fundamental laparoscopic skill procedures

Hannes Prescher, David E. Biffar, Jerzy W Rozenblit, Allan J Hamilton

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether or not a standard definition stereoscopic, 3D display could improve trainees' performance on a standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopy (FLS) task. Thirty-two procedurally naïve volunteers were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomized to begin the trials on either the 3D or 2D display and performed 10 trials on a peg transfer task (SAGES). Subjects alternated between 3D and 2D displays for each trial. Time to completion of task, and the number of dropped objects were recorded for each trial, and a subjective evaluation of the subjects' preference in display monitor was collected. Mean time for peg transfer was significantly faster with the 3D monitor than the 2D monitor (114.22 s. versus 133.05 s.; SE: 3.82; P < 0.0001). The number of dropped objects was significantly reduced in trials using the 3D monitor (3.09 versus 4.25; SE: 0.34 P = 0.035). Complaints related to the stereoscopic display monitor included teary eyes (18.75%) and dizziness (12.5%). Nevertheless, 81.25% of subjects preferred the 3D display monitor. The 3D stereoscopic monitor display significantly improves performance of laparoscopic surgery skills on a standardized FLS peg transfer task.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSimulation Series
PublisherThe Society for Modeling and Simulation International
Pages346-351
Number of pages6
Volume46
Edition10
StatePublished - 2014
EventSummer Computer Simulation Conference, SCSC 2014, Part of the 2014 Summer Simulation Multiconference, SummerSim 2014 - Monterey, United States
Duration: Jul 6 2014Jul 10 2014

Other

OtherSummer Computer Simulation Conference, SCSC 2014, Part of the 2014 Summer Simulation Multiconference, SummerSim 2014
CountryUnited States
CityMonterey
Period7/6/147/10/14

Fingerprint

Display devices
Laparoscopy
Surgery

Keywords

  • FLS
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Stereoscopy
  • Surgical training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Prescher, H., Biffar, D. E., Rozenblit, J. W., & Hamilton, A. J. (2014). The comparison of high definition versus stereoscopic display on standardized fundamental laparoscopic skill procedures. In Simulation Series (10 ed., Vol. 46, pp. 346-351). The Society for Modeling and Simulation International.

The comparison of high definition versus stereoscopic display on standardized fundamental laparoscopic skill procedures. / Prescher, Hannes; Biffar, David E.; Rozenblit, Jerzy W; Hamilton, Allan J.

Simulation Series. Vol. 46 10. ed. The Society for Modeling and Simulation International, 2014. p. 346-351.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Prescher, H, Biffar, DE, Rozenblit, JW & Hamilton, AJ 2014, The comparison of high definition versus stereoscopic display on standardized fundamental laparoscopic skill procedures. in Simulation Series. 10 edn, vol. 46, The Society for Modeling and Simulation International, pp. 346-351, Summer Computer Simulation Conference, SCSC 2014, Part of the 2014 Summer Simulation Multiconference, SummerSim 2014, Monterey, United States, 7/6/14.
Prescher H, Biffar DE, Rozenblit JW, Hamilton AJ. The comparison of high definition versus stereoscopic display on standardized fundamental laparoscopic skill procedures. In Simulation Series. 10 ed. Vol. 46. The Society for Modeling and Simulation International. 2014. p. 346-351
Prescher, Hannes ; Biffar, David E. ; Rozenblit, Jerzy W ; Hamilton, Allan J. / The comparison of high definition versus stereoscopic display on standardized fundamental laparoscopic skill procedures. Simulation Series. Vol. 46 10. ed. The Society for Modeling and Simulation International, 2014. pp. 346-351
@inproceedings{89c0678910b24dec8658935c55c9a80b,
title = "The comparison of high definition versus stereoscopic display on standardized fundamental laparoscopic skill procedures",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to determine whether or not a standard definition stereoscopic, 3D display could improve trainees' performance on a standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopy (FLS) task. Thirty-two procedurally na{\"i}ve volunteers were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomized to begin the trials on either the 3D or 2D display and performed 10 trials on a peg transfer task (SAGES). Subjects alternated between 3D and 2D displays for each trial. Time to completion of task, and the number of dropped objects were recorded for each trial, and a subjective evaluation of the subjects' preference in display monitor was collected. Mean time for peg transfer was significantly faster with the 3D monitor than the 2D monitor (114.22 s. versus 133.05 s.; SE: 3.82; P < 0.0001). The number of dropped objects was significantly reduced in trials using the 3D monitor (3.09 versus 4.25; SE: 0.34 P = 0.035). Complaints related to the stereoscopic display monitor included teary eyes (18.75{\%}) and dizziness (12.5{\%}). Nevertheless, 81.25{\%} of subjects preferred the 3D display monitor. The 3D stereoscopic monitor display significantly improves performance of laparoscopic surgery skills on a standardized FLS peg transfer task.",
keywords = "FLS, Laparoscopic surgery, Stereoscopy, Surgical training",
author = "Hannes Prescher and Biffar, {David E.} and Rozenblit, {Jerzy W} and Hamilton, {Allan J}",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "346--351",
booktitle = "Simulation Series",
publisher = "The Society for Modeling and Simulation International",
edition = "10",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The comparison of high definition versus stereoscopic display on standardized fundamental laparoscopic skill procedures

AU - Prescher, Hannes

AU - Biffar, David E.

AU - Rozenblit, Jerzy W

AU - Hamilton, Allan J

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The objective of this study was to determine whether or not a standard definition stereoscopic, 3D display could improve trainees' performance on a standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopy (FLS) task. Thirty-two procedurally naïve volunteers were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomized to begin the trials on either the 3D or 2D display and performed 10 trials on a peg transfer task (SAGES). Subjects alternated between 3D and 2D displays for each trial. Time to completion of task, and the number of dropped objects were recorded for each trial, and a subjective evaluation of the subjects' preference in display monitor was collected. Mean time for peg transfer was significantly faster with the 3D monitor than the 2D monitor (114.22 s. versus 133.05 s.; SE: 3.82; P < 0.0001). The number of dropped objects was significantly reduced in trials using the 3D monitor (3.09 versus 4.25; SE: 0.34 P = 0.035). Complaints related to the stereoscopic display monitor included teary eyes (18.75%) and dizziness (12.5%). Nevertheless, 81.25% of subjects preferred the 3D display monitor. The 3D stereoscopic monitor display significantly improves performance of laparoscopic surgery skills on a standardized FLS peg transfer task.

AB - The objective of this study was to determine whether or not a standard definition stereoscopic, 3D display could improve trainees' performance on a standard Fundamentals of Laparoscopy (FLS) task. Thirty-two procedurally naïve volunteers were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomized to begin the trials on either the 3D or 2D display and performed 10 trials on a peg transfer task (SAGES). Subjects alternated between 3D and 2D displays for each trial. Time to completion of task, and the number of dropped objects were recorded for each trial, and a subjective evaluation of the subjects' preference in display monitor was collected. Mean time for peg transfer was significantly faster with the 3D monitor than the 2D monitor (114.22 s. versus 133.05 s.; SE: 3.82; P < 0.0001). The number of dropped objects was significantly reduced in trials using the 3D monitor (3.09 versus 4.25; SE: 0.34 P = 0.035). Complaints related to the stereoscopic display monitor included teary eyes (18.75%) and dizziness (12.5%). Nevertheless, 81.25% of subjects preferred the 3D display monitor. The 3D stereoscopic monitor display significantly improves performance of laparoscopic surgery skills on a standardized FLS peg transfer task.

KW - FLS

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Stereoscopy

KW - Surgical training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908269028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908269028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84908269028

VL - 46

SP - 346

EP - 351

BT - Simulation Series

PB - The Society for Modeling and Simulation International

ER -