The conservation biologist's toolbox - principles for the design and analysis of conservation studies

Corey J A Bradshaw, Barry W. Brook, Toby A. Gardner, David Bickford, Noah K Whiteman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this chapter, Corey J. A. Bradshaw and Barry W. Brook, discuss measures of biodiversity patterns followed by an overview of experimental design and associated statistical paradigms. Conservation biology is a highly multidisciplinary science employing methods from ecology, Earth systems science, genetics, physiology, veterinary science, medicine, mathematics, climatology, anthropology, psychology, sociology, environmental policy, geography, political science, and resource management. Here we focus primarily on ecological methods and experimental design. It is impossible to census all species in an ecosystem, so many different measures exist to compare biodiversity: these include indices such as species richness, Simpson's diversity, Shannon's index and Brouillin's index. Many variants of these indices exist. The scale of biodiversity patterns is important to consider for biodiversity comparisons: α (local), β (between-site), and γ (regional or continental) diversity. Often surrogate species - the number, distribution or pattern of species in a particular taxon in a particular area thought to indicate a much wider array of taxa - are required to simplify biodiversity assessments. Many similarity, dissimilarity, clustering, and multivariate techniques are available to compare biodiversity indices among sites. Conservation biology rarely uses completely manipulative experimental designs (although there are exceptions), with mensurative (based on existing environmental gradients) and observational studies dominating. Two main statistical paradigms exist for comparing biodiversity: null hypothesis testing and multiple working hypotheses - the latter paradigm is more consistent with the constraints typical of conservation data and so should be invoked when possible. Bayesian inferential methods generally provide more certainty when prior data exist. Large sample sizes, appropriate replication and randomization are cornerstone concepts in all conservation experiments. Simple relative abundance time series (sequential counts of individuals) can be used to infer more complex ecological mechanisms that permit the estimation of extinction risk, population trends, and intrinsic feedbacks. The risk of a species going extinct or becoming invasive can be predicted using cross-taxonomic comparisons of life history traits. Population viability analyses are essential tools to estimate extinction risk over defined periods and under particular management interventions. Many methods exist to implement these, including count-based, demographic, metapopulation, and genetic. Many tools exist to examine how genetics affects extinction risk, of which perhaps the measurement of inbreeding depression, gene flow among populations, and the loss of genetic diversity with habitat degradation are the most important.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConservation Biology for All
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780191720666, 9780199554232
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
biologists
biodiversity
Research Design
extinction
experimental design
Ecosystem
Earth system science
Earth Sciences
Meteorology
Environmental Policy
sociology
Biological Sciences
anthropology
Geography
Veterinary Medicine
Bayes Theorem
Anthropology
environmental policy
Gene Flow

Keywords

  • Bayesian inferential methods
  • Biodiversity patterns
  • Ecological methods
  • Experimental design
  • Extinction risk
  • Inbreeding depression
  • Population viability analysis
  • Species richness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Bradshaw, C. J. A., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Bickford, D., & Whiteman, N. K. (2010). The conservation biologist's toolbox - principles for the design and analysis of conservation studies. In Conservation Biology for All Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554232.003.0017

The conservation biologist's toolbox - principles for the design and analysis of conservation studies. / Bradshaw, Corey J A; Brook, Barry W.; Gardner, Toby A.; Bickford, David; Whiteman, Noah K.

Conservation Biology for All. Oxford University Press, 2010.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bradshaw, CJA, Brook, BW, Gardner, TA, Bickford, D & Whiteman, NK 2010, The conservation biologist's toolbox - principles for the design and analysis of conservation studies. in Conservation Biology for All. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554232.003.0017
Bradshaw, Corey J A ; Brook, Barry W. ; Gardner, Toby A. ; Bickford, David ; Whiteman, Noah K. / The conservation biologist's toolbox - principles for the design and analysis of conservation studies. Conservation Biology for All. Oxford University Press, 2010.
@inbook{9bf2dede9b77460e92bc07cd300488ac,
title = "The conservation biologist's toolbox - principles for the design and analysis of conservation studies",
abstract = "In this chapter, Corey J. A. Bradshaw and Barry W. Brook, discuss measures of biodiversity patterns followed by an overview of experimental design and associated statistical paradigms. Conservation biology is a highly multidisciplinary science employing methods from ecology, Earth systems science, genetics, physiology, veterinary science, medicine, mathematics, climatology, anthropology, psychology, sociology, environmental policy, geography, political science, and resource management. Here we focus primarily on ecological methods and experimental design. It is impossible to census all species in an ecosystem, so many different measures exist to compare biodiversity: these include indices such as species richness, Simpson's diversity, Shannon's index and Brouillin's index. Many variants of these indices exist. The scale of biodiversity patterns is important to consider for biodiversity comparisons: α (local), β (between-site), and γ (regional or continental) diversity. Often surrogate species - the number, distribution or pattern of species in a particular taxon in a particular area thought to indicate a much wider array of taxa - are required to simplify biodiversity assessments. Many similarity, dissimilarity, clustering, and multivariate techniques are available to compare biodiversity indices among sites. Conservation biology rarely uses completely manipulative experimental designs (although there are exceptions), with mensurative (based on existing environmental gradients) and observational studies dominating. Two main statistical paradigms exist for comparing biodiversity: null hypothesis testing and multiple working hypotheses - the latter paradigm is more consistent with the constraints typical of conservation data and so should be invoked when possible. Bayesian inferential methods generally provide more certainty when prior data exist. Large sample sizes, appropriate replication and randomization are cornerstone concepts in all conservation experiments. Simple relative abundance time series (sequential counts of individuals) can be used to infer more complex ecological mechanisms that permit the estimation of extinction risk, population trends, and intrinsic feedbacks. The risk of a species going extinct or becoming invasive can be predicted using cross-taxonomic comparisons of life history traits. Population viability analyses are essential tools to estimate extinction risk over defined periods and under particular management interventions. Many methods exist to implement these, including count-based, demographic, metapopulation, and genetic. Many tools exist to examine how genetics affects extinction risk, of which perhaps the measurement of inbreeding depression, gene flow among populations, and the loss of genetic diversity with habitat degradation are the most important.",
keywords = "Bayesian inferential methods, Biodiversity patterns, Ecological methods, Experimental design, Extinction risk, Inbreeding depression, Population viability analysis, Species richness",
author = "Bradshaw, {Corey J A} and Brook, {Barry W.} and Gardner, {Toby A.} and David Bickford and Whiteman, {Noah K}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554232.003.0017",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780191720666",
booktitle = "Conservation Biology for All",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The conservation biologist's toolbox - principles for the design and analysis of conservation studies

AU - Bradshaw, Corey J A

AU - Brook, Barry W.

AU - Gardner, Toby A.

AU - Bickford, David

AU - Whiteman, Noah K

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - In this chapter, Corey J. A. Bradshaw and Barry W. Brook, discuss measures of biodiversity patterns followed by an overview of experimental design and associated statistical paradigms. Conservation biology is a highly multidisciplinary science employing methods from ecology, Earth systems science, genetics, physiology, veterinary science, medicine, mathematics, climatology, anthropology, psychology, sociology, environmental policy, geography, political science, and resource management. Here we focus primarily on ecological methods and experimental design. It is impossible to census all species in an ecosystem, so many different measures exist to compare biodiversity: these include indices such as species richness, Simpson's diversity, Shannon's index and Brouillin's index. Many variants of these indices exist. The scale of biodiversity patterns is important to consider for biodiversity comparisons: α (local), β (between-site), and γ (regional or continental) diversity. Often surrogate species - the number, distribution or pattern of species in a particular taxon in a particular area thought to indicate a much wider array of taxa - are required to simplify biodiversity assessments. Many similarity, dissimilarity, clustering, and multivariate techniques are available to compare biodiversity indices among sites. Conservation biology rarely uses completely manipulative experimental designs (although there are exceptions), with mensurative (based on existing environmental gradients) and observational studies dominating. Two main statistical paradigms exist for comparing biodiversity: null hypothesis testing and multiple working hypotheses - the latter paradigm is more consistent with the constraints typical of conservation data and so should be invoked when possible. Bayesian inferential methods generally provide more certainty when prior data exist. Large sample sizes, appropriate replication and randomization are cornerstone concepts in all conservation experiments. Simple relative abundance time series (sequential counts of individuals) can be used to infer more complex ecological mechanisms that permit the estimation of extinction risk, population trends, and intrinsic feedbacks. The risk of a species going extinct or becoming invasive can be predicted using cross-taxonomic comparisons of life history traits. Population viability analyses are essential tools to estimate extinction risk over defined periods and under particular management interventions. Many methods exist to implement these, including count-based, demographic, metapopulation, and genetic. Many tools exist to examine how genetics affects extinction risk, of which perhaps the measurement of inbreeding depression, gene flow among populations, and the loss of genetic diversity with habitat degradation are the most important.

AB - In this chapter, Corey J. A. Bradshaw and Barry W. Brook, discuss measures of biodiversity patterns followed by an overview of experimental design and associated statistical paradigms. Conservation biology is a highly multidisciplinary science employing methods from ecology, Earth systems science, genetics, physiology, veterinary science, medicine, mathematics, climatology, anthropology, psychology, sociology, environmental policy, geography, political science, and resource management. Here we focus primarily on ecological methods and experimental design. It is impossible to census all species in an ecosystem, so many different measures exist to compare biodiversity: these include indices such as species richness, Simpson's diversity, Shannon's index and Brouillin's index. Many variants of these indices exist. The scale of biodiversity patterns is important to consider for biodiversity comparisons: α (local), β (between-site), and γ (regional or continental) diversity. Often surrogate species - the number, distribution or pattern of species in a particular taxon in a particular area thought to indicate a much wider array of taxa - are required to simplify biodiversity assessments. Many similarity, dissimilarity, clustering, and multivariate techniques are available to compare biodiversity indices among sites. Conservation biology rarely uses completely manipulative experimental designs (although there are exceptions), with mensurative (based on existing environmental gradients) and observational studies dominating. Two main statistical paradigms exist for comparing biodiversity: null hypothesis testing and multiple working hypotheses - the latter paradigm is more consistent with the constraints typical of conservation data and so should be invoked when possible. Bayesian inferential methods generally provide more certainty when prior data exist. Large sample sizes, appropriate replication and randomization are cornerstone concepts in all conservation experiments. Simple relative abundance time series (sequential counts of individuals) can be used to infer more complex ecological mechanisms that permit the estimation of extinction risk, population trends, and intrinsic feedbacks. The risk of a species going extinct or becoming invasive can be predicted using cross-taxonomic comparisons of life history traits. Population viability analyses are essential tools to estimate extinction risk over defined periods and under particular management interventions. Many methods exist to implement these, including count-based, demographic, metapopulation, and genetic. Many tools exist to examine how genetics affects extinction risk, of which perhaps the measurement of inbreeding depression, gene flow among populations, and the loss of genetic diversity with habitat degradation are the most important.

KW - Bayesian inferential methods

KW - Biodiversity patterns

KW - Ecological methods

KW - Experimental design

KW - Extinction risk

KW - Inbreeding depression

KW - Population viability analysis

KW - Species richness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78249279611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78249279611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554232.003.0017

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554232.003.0017

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780191720666

SN - 9780199554232

BT - Conservation Biology for All

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -