The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice

Fiona Kate Barlow, Stefania Paolini, Anne Pedersen, Matthew J. Hornsey, Helena R M Radke, James T Harwood, Mark Rubin, Chris G. Sibley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

207 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contact researchers have largely overlooked the potential for negative intergroup contact to increase prejudice. In Study 1, we tested the interaction between contact quantity and valence on prejudice toward Black Australians (n = 1,476), Muslim Australians (n = 173), and asylum seekers (n = 293). In all cases, the association between contact quantity and prejudice was moderated by its valence, with negative contact emerging as a stronger and more consistent predictor than positive contact. In Study 2, White Americans (n = 441) indicated how much positive and negative contact they had with Black Americans on separate measures. Although both quantity of positive and negative contact predicted racism and avoidance, negative contact was the stronger predictor. Furthermore, negative (but not positive) contact independently predicted suspicion about Barack Obama's birthplace. These results extend the contact hypothesis by issuing an important caveat: Negative contact may be more strongly associated with increased racism and discrimination than positive contact is with its reduction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1629-1643
Number of pages15
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume38
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Racism
Islam
Refugees
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • contact hypothesis
  • negative contact
  • positive contact
  • prejudice
  • racism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The Contact Caveat : Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice. / Barlow, Fiona Kate; Paolini, Stefania; Pedersen, Anne; Hornsey, Matthew J.; Radke, Helena R M; Harwood, James T; Rubin, Mark; Sibley, Chris G.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 12, 12.2012, p. 1629-1643.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barlow, Fiona Kate ; Paolini, Stefania ; Pedersen, Anne ; Hornsey, Matthew J. ; Radke, Helena R M ; Harwood, James T ; Rubin, Mark ; Sibley, Chris G. / The Contact Caveat : Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2012 ; Vol. 38, No. 12. pp. 1629-1643.
@article{1470764f0ef5476b92947c62c3657218,
title = "The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice",
abstract = "Contact researchers have largely overlooked the potential for negative intergroup contact to increase prejudice. In Study 1, we tested the interaction between contact quantity and valence on prejudice toward Black Australians (n = 1,476), Muslim Australians (n = 173), and asylum seekers (n = 293). In all cases, the association between contact quantity and prejudice was moderated by its valence, with negative contact emerging as a stronger and more consistent predictor than positive contact. In Study 2, White Americans (n = 441) indicated how much positive and negative contact they had with Black Americans on separate measures. Although both quantity of positive and negative contact predicted racism and avoidance, negative contact was the stronger predictor. Furthermore, negative (but not positive) contact independently predicted suspicion about Barack Obama's birthplace. These results extend the contact hypothesis by issuing an important caveat: Negative contact may be more strongly associated with increased racism and discrimination than positive contact is with its reduction.",
keywords = "contact hypothesis, negative contact, positive contact, prejudice, racism",
author = "Barlow, {Fiona Kate} and Stefania Paolini and Anne Pedersen and Hornsey, {Matthew J.} and Radke, {Helena R M} and Harwood, {James T} and Mark Rubin and Sibley, {Chris G.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0146167212457953",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1629--1643",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Contact Caveat

T2 - Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice

AU - Barlow, Fiona Kate

AU - Paolini, Stefania

AU - Pedersen, Anne

AU - Hornsey, Matthew J.

AU - Radke, Helena R M

AU - Harwood, James T

AU - Rubin, Mark

AU - Sibley, Chris G.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Contact researchers have largely overlooked the potential for negative intergroup contact to increase prejudice. In Study 1, we tested the interaction between contact quantity and valence on prejudice toward Black Australians (n = 1,476), Muslim Australians (n = 173), and asylum seekers (n = 293). In all cases, the association between contact quantity and prejudice was moderated by its valence, with negative contact emerging as a stronger and more consistent predictor than positive contact. In Study 2, White Americans (n = 441) indicated how much positive and negative contact they had with Black Americans on separate measures. Although both quantity of positive and negative contact predicted racism and avoidance, negative contact was the stronger predictor. Furthermore, negative (but not positive) contact independently predicted suspicion about Barack Obama's birthplace. These results extend the contact hypothesis by issuing an important caveat: Negative contact may be more strongly associated with increased racism and discrimination than positive contact is with its reduction.

AB - Contact researchers have largely overlooked the potential for negative intergroup contact to increase prejudice. In Study 1, we tested the interaction between contact quantity and valence on prejudice toward Black Australians (n = 1,476), Muslim Australians (n = 173), and asylum seekers (n = 293). In all cases, the association between contact quantity and prejudice was moderated by its valence, with negative contact emerging as a stronger and more consistent predictor than positive contact. In Study 2, White Americans (n = 441) indicated how much positive and negative contact they had with Black Americans on separate measures. Although both quantity of positive and negative contact predicted racism and avoidance, negative contact was the stronger predictor. Furthermore, negative (but not positive) contact independently predicted suspicion about Barack Obama's birthplace. These results extend the contact hypothesis by issuing an important caveat: Negative contact may be more strongly associated with increased racism and discrimination than positive contact is with its reduction.

KW - contact hypothesis

KW - negative contact

KW - positive contact

KW - prejudice

KW - racism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870191452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870191452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167212457953

DO - 10.1177/0146167212457953

M3 - Article

C2 - 22941796

AN - SCOPUS:84870191452

VL - 38

SP - 1629

EP - 1643

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 12

ER -