The costs of compliance with interstate agreements: Lessons from water compacts in the Western United States

Edella Schlager, Tanya Heikkila, Carl Case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interstate compacts are one of the primary institutional mechanisms that states use for addressing regional issues such as sharing and management of transboundary rivers. However, state compliance with compacts can be challenging and costly. This article asks: how do conflict resolution venues and the design of state administrative systems affect the distribution of compliance costs? Through a study of western interstate water compacts we find that compliance costs are more equally shared among states in voluntary conflict resolution venues compared to compulsory venues. In addition, centralized administrative systems result in state governments bearing the costs of compliance actions, whereas polycentric administrative systems distribute costs between the state and water users. Finally, we explore the applicability of our findings to other interstate settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)494-515
Number of pages22
JournalPublius
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

administrative system
water
conflict resolution
costs
river
management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

The costs of compliance with interstate agreements : Lessons from water compacts in the Western United States. / Schlager, Edella; Heikkila, Tanya; Case, Carl.

In: Publius, Vol. 42, No. 3, 06.2012, p. 494-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d53f44cfae7476e8c62f9388d58f433,
title = "The costs of compliance with interstate agreements: Lessons from water compacts in the Western United States",
abstract = "Interstate compacts are one of the primary institutional mechanisms that states use for addressing regional issues such as sharing and management of transboundary rivers. However, state compliance with compacts can be challenging and costly. This article asks: how do conflict resolution venues and the design of state administrative systems affect the distribution of compliance costs? Through a study of western interstate water compacts we find that compliance costs are more equally shared among states in voluntary conflict resolution venues compared to compulsory venues. In addition, centralized administrative systems result in state governments bearing the costs of compliance actions, whereas polycentric administrative systems distribute costs between the state and water users. Finally, we explore the applicability of our findings to other interstate settings.",
author = "Edella Schlager and Tanya Heikkila and Carl Case",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1093/publius/pjs017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "494--515",
journal = "Publius",
issn = "0048-5950",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The costs of compliance with interstate agreements

T2 - Lessons from water compacts in the Western United States

AU - Schlager, Edella

AU - Heikkila, Tanya

AU - Case, Carl

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Interstate compacts are one of the primary institutional mechanisms that states use for addressing regional issues such as sharing and management of transboundary rivers. However, state compliance with compacts can be challenging and costly. This article asks: how do conflict resolution venues and the design of state administrative systems affect the distribution of compliance costs? Through a study of western interstate water compacts we find that compliance costs are more equally shared among states in voluntary conflict resolution venues compared to compulsory venues. In addition, centralized administrative systems result in state governments bearing the costs of compliance actions, whereas polycentric administrative systems distribute costs between the state and water users. Finally, we explore the applicability of our findings to other interstate settings.

AB - Interstate compacts are one of the primary institutional mechanisms that states use for addressing regional issues such as sharing and management of transboundary rivers. However, state compliance with compacts can be challenging and costly. This article asks: how do conflict resolution venues and the design of state administrative systems affect the distribution of compliance costs? Through a study of western interstate water compacts we find that compliance costs are more equally shared among states in voluntary conflict resolution venues compared to compulsory venues. In addition, centralized administrative systems result in state governments bearing the costs of compliance actions, whereas polycentric administrative systems distribute costs between the state and water users. Finally, we explore the applicability of our findings to other interstate settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863950504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863950504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/publius/pjs017

DO - 10.1093/publius/pjs017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84863950504

VL - 42

SP - 494

EP - 515

JO - Publius

JF - Publius

SN - 0048-5950

IS - 3

ER -