The CRONUS-Earth inter-comparison for cosmogenic isotope analysis

A.J. Timothy Jull, E. Marian Scott, Paul Bierman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As part of the NSF-funded program CRONUS-Earth, a series of natural reference materials for in situ produced 26Al, 10Be, 14C, and 36Cl were prepared and circulated to United States, Australian, and European laboratories for analysis to explore the comparability of results from the different laboratories and generate preliminary consensus values for a range of reference material. Such reference materials, which did not exist for these isotopes, assist laboratories in independently assessing quality and are useful to quantify precision and accuracy. Currently, most researchers report only internal analytical uncertainties for all results. While researchers have acknowledged the need for realistic inter-laboratory uncertainties for in situ produced cosmogenic isotopes, few previous studies have addressed this issue. Two samples (denoted A and N) were provided for 26Al, 10Be and in situ 14C analysis, one from the Antarctic, high in 26Al and 10Be and the other from Australia, lower in both 26Al and 10Be. Both samples were prepared to quartz at the University of Vermont. For each sample, results have been summarised in terms of the mean reported concentration, standard deviation both between (inter) and within (intra) laboratories to describe inter- and intra-laboratory variability. Coefficients of variation (CoV) expressed as a percentage of the mean are also reported. For in-situ 14C, a small number of laboratories reported results, so they are summarised separately. Initial uncorrected results for 10Be for samples A and N showed significant variation (greater than 8% CoV) in results. When corrected to a common standardisation basis, the CoV was 2.9% for 10Be measurements of sample A (high concentration) and to 4.1% for sample N (lower concentration), which is closer to typical cosmogenic samples. 26Al measurements had greater variation; a CoV of 4.9% was achieved for sample A (high concentration) but for the lower concentration sample N, the CoV was 10.1%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-10
Number of pages8
JournalQuaternary Geochronology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

isotope
laboratory
analysis
comparison
standardization
quartz
in situ
material

Keywords

  • Consensus values
  • Cosmogenic nuclides
  • Errors
  • Intercomparison
  • Reference material

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology
  • Stratigraphy
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The CRONUS-Earth inter-comparison for cosmogenic isotope analysis. / Jull, A.J. Timothy; Scott, E. Marian; Bierman, Paul.

In: Quaternary Geochronology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2015, p. 3-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jull, A.J. Timothy ; Scott, E. Marian ; Bierman, Paul. / The CRONUS-Earth inter-comparison for cosmogenic isotope analysis. In: Quaternary Geochronology. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 3-10.
@article{6e90b1a42a194cca845d5601588d6050,
title = "The CRONUS-Earth inter-comparison for cosmogenic isotope analysis",
abstract = "As part of the NSF-funded program CRONUS-Earth, a series of natural reference materials for in situ produced 26Al, 10Be, 14C, and 36Cl were prepared and circulated to United States, Australian, and European laboratories for analysis to explore the comparability of results from the different laboratories and generate preliminary consensus values for a range of reference material. Such reference materials, which did not exist for these isotopes, assist laboratories in independently assessing quality and are useful to quantify precision and accuracy. Currently, most researchers report only internal analytical uncertainties for all results. While researchers have acknowledged the need for realistic inter-laboratory uncertainties for in situ produced cosmogenic isotopes, few previous studies have addressed this issue. Two samples (denoted A and N) were provided for 26Al, 10Be and in situ 14C analysis, one from the Antarctic, high in 26Al and 10Be and the other from Australia, lower in both 26Al and 10Be. Both samples were prepared to quartz at the University of Vermont. For each sample, results have been summarised in terms of the mean reported concentration, standard deviation both between (inter) and within (intra) laboratories to describe inter- and intra-laboratory variability. Coefficients of variation (CoV) expressed as a percentage of the mean are also reported. For in-situ 14C, a small number of laboratories reported results, so they are summarised separately. Initial uncorrected results for 10Be for samples A and N showed significant variation (greater than 8{\%} CoV) in results. When corrected to a common standardisation basis, the CoV was 2.9{\%} for 10Be measurements of sample A (high concentration) and to 4.1{\%} for sample N (lower concentration), which is closer to typical cosmogenic samples. 26Al measurements had greater variation; a CoV of 4.9{\%} was achieved for sample A (high concentration) but for the lower concentration sample N, the CoV was 10.1{\%}.",
keywords = "Consensus values, Cosmogenic nuclides, Errors, Intercomparison, Reference material",
author = "Jull, {A.J. Timothy} and Scott, {E. Marian} and Paul Bierman",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.quageo.2013.09.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "3--10",
journal = "Quaternary Geochronology",
issn = "1871-1014",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The CRONUS-Earth inter-comparison for cosmogenic isotope analysis

AU - Jull, A.J. Timothy

AU - Scott, E. Marian

AU - Bierman, Paul

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - As part of the NSF-funded program CRONUS-Earth, a series of natural reference materials for in situ produced 26Al, 10Be, 14C, and 36Cl were prepared and circulated to United States, Australian, and European laboratories for analysis to explore the comparability of results from the different laboratories and generate preliminary consensus values for a range of reference material. Such reference materials, which did not exist for these isotopes, assist laboratories in independently assessing quality and are useful to quantify precision and accuracy. Currently, most researchers report only internal analytical uncertainties for all results. While researchers have acknowledged the need for realistic inter-laboratory uncertainties for in situ produced cosmogenic isotopes, few previous studies have addressed this issue. Two samples (denoted A and N) were provided for 26Al, 10Be and in situ 14C analysis, one from the Antarctic, high in 26Al and 10Be and the other from Australia, lower in both 26Al and 10Be. Both samples were prepared to quartz at the University of Vermont. For each sample, results have been summarised in terms of the mean reported concentration, standard deviation both between (inter) and within (intra) laboratories to describe inter- and intra-laboratory variability. Coefficients of variation (CoV) expressed as a percentage of the mean are also reported. For in-situ 14C, a small number of laboratories reported results, so they are summarised separately. Initial uncorrected results for 10Be for samples A and N showed significant variation (greater than 8% CoV) in results. When corrected to a common standardisation basis, the CoV was 2.9% for 10Be measurements of sample A (high concentration) and to 4.1% for sample N (lower concentration), which is closer to typical cosmogenic samples. 26Al measurements had greater variation; a CoV of 4.9% was achieved for sample A (high concentration) but for the lower concentration sample N, the CoV was 10.1%.

AB - As part of the NSF-funded program CRONUS-Earth, a series of natural reference materials for in situ produced 26Al, 10Be, 14C, and 36Cl were prepared and circulated to United States, Australian, and European laboratories for analysis to explore the comparability of results from the different laboratories and generate preliminary consensus values for a range of reference material. Such reference materials, which did not exist for these isotopes, assist laboratories in independently assessing quality and are useful to quantify precision and accuracy. Currently, most researchers report only internal analytical uncertainties for all results. While researchers have acknowledged the need for realistic inter-laboratory uncertainties for in situ produced cosmogenic isotopes, few previous studies have addressed this issue. Two samples (denoted A and N) were provided for 26Al, 10Be and in situ 14C analysis, one from the Antarctic, high in 26Al and 10Be and the other from Australia, lower in both 26Al and 10Be. Both samples were prepared to quartz at the University of Vermont. For each sample, results have been summarised in terms of the mean reported concentration, standard deviation both between (inter) and within (intra) laboratories to describe inter- and intra-laboratory variability. Coefficients of variation (CoV) expressed as a percentage of the mean are also reported. For in-situ 14C, a small number of laboratories reported results, so they are summarised separately. Initial uncorrected results for 10Be for samples A and N showed significant variation (greater than 8% CoV) in results. When corrected to a common standardisation basis, the CoV was 2.9% for 10Be measurements of sample A (high concentration) and to 4.1% for sample N (lower concentration), which is closer to typical cosmogenic samples. 26Al measurements had greater variation; a CoV of 4.9% was achieved for sample A (high concentration) but for the lower concentration sample N, the CoV was 10.1%.

KW - Consensus values

KW - Cosmogenic nuclides

KW - Errors

KW - Intercomparison

KW - Reference material

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027928337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027928337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.quageo.2013.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 3

EP - 10

JO - Quaternary Geochronology

JF - Quaternary Geochronology

SN - 1871-1014

IS - 1

ER -