The diffusion of different types of internet activism: Suggestive patterns in website adoption of innovations

Jennifer Suzanne Earl, Katrina Kimport

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been substantial interest in Internet activism among academics from a wide spectrum of fields over the past decade. Whether studying unlikely Internet phenoms such as the Zapatistas (e.g., Garrido and Halavais 2003), theorizing about the relationship between information technology and social movements (e.g., Tarrow 1998b; Tilly 2004), or examining how specific protest tactics, such as online petitions, have made their way online (Earl 2006a; Earl and Schussman 2007; Earl and Kimport 2008), researchers have been working to understand the impacts of a large array of new digital technologies. One question that has been raised, but far from sufficiently answered, involves the dynamics of diffusion online. For instance, a number of scholars have argued that Internet usage can lead to changes in the scale of organizing (Foot and Schneider 2002) by increasing the speed of diffusion (Ayres 1999), increasing the size of the audience (Myers 1994), or increasing the global reach of messages (Garrido and Halavais 2003). Other authors have stressed the spread of online activism to new types of participants and to address novel issues (Earl and Kimport 2009). However, little is known thus far about the processes involved and how far different types of diffusion have already progressed (but see Earl 2010 for a theoretical review of potential broad types of diffusion relevant to online protest).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages125-139
Number of pages15
ISBN (Print)9780511761638, 9780521193733
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

website
innovation
Internet
protest
petition
Social Movements
tactics
information technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Earl, J. S., & Kimport, K. (2010). The diffusion of different types of internet activism: Suggestive patterns in website adoption of innovations. In The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects (pp. 125-139). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761638.008

The diffusion of different types of internet activism : Suggestive patterns in website adoption of innovations. / Earl, Jennifer Suzanne; Kimport, Katrina.

The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 125-139.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Earl, JS & Kimport, K 2010, The diffusion of different types of internet activism: Suggestive patterns in website adoption of innovations. in The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects. Cambridge University Press, pp. 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761638.008
Earl JS, Kimport K. The diffusion of different types of internet activism: Suggestive patterns in website adoption of innovations. In The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 125-139 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761638.008
Earl, Jennifer Suzanne ; Kimport, Katrina. / The diffusion of different types of internet activism : Suggestive patterns in website adoption of innovations. The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 125-139
@inbook{43aa1f4baa4e4b97b577e60b87c3f719,
title = "The diffusion of different types of internet activism: Suggestive patterns in website adoption of innovations",
abstract = "There has been substantial interest in Internet activism among academics from a wide spectrum of fields over the past decade. Whether studying unlikely Internet phenoms such as the Zapatistas (e.g., Garrido and Halavais 2003), theorizing about the relationship between information technology and social movements (e.g., Tarrow 1998b; Tilly 2004), or examining how specific protest tactics, such as online petitions, have made their way online (Earl 2006a; Earl and Schussman 2007; Earl and Kimport 2008), researchers have been working to understand the impacts of a large array of new digital technologies. One question that has been raised, but far from sufficiently answered, involves the dynamics of diffusion online. For instance, a number of scholars have argued that Internet usage can lead to changes in the scale of organizing (Foot and Schneider 2002) by increasing the speed of diffusion (Ayres 1999), increasing the size of the audience (Myers 1994), or increasing the global reach of messages (Garrido and Halavais 2003). Other authors have stressed the spread of online activism to new types of participants and to address novel issues (Earl and Kimport 2009). However, little is known thus far about the processes involved and how far different types of diffusion have already progressed (but see Earl 2010 for a theoretical review of potential broad types of diffusion relevant to online protest).",
author = "Earl, {Jennifer Suzanne} and Katrina Kimport",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511761638.008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511761638",
pages = "125--139",
booktitle = "The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The diffusion of different types of internet activism

T2 - Suggestive patterns in website adoption of innovations

AU - Earl, Jennifer Suzanne

AU - Kimport, Katrina

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - There has been substantial interest in Internet activism among academics from a wide spectrum of fields over the past decade. Whether studying unlikely Internet phenoms such as the Zapatistas (e.g., Garrido and Halavais 2003), theorizing about the relationship between information technology and social movements (e.g., Tarrow 1998b; Tilly 2004), or examining how specific protest tactics, such as online petitions, have made their way online (Earl 2006a; Earl and Schussman 2007; Earl and Kimport 2008), researchers have been working to understand the impacts of a large array of new digital technologies. One question that has been raised, but far from sufficiently answered, involves the dynamics of diffusion online. For instance, a number of scholars have argued that Internet usage can lead to changes in the scale of organizing (Foot and Schneider 2002) by increasing the speed of diffusion (Ayres 1999), increasing the size of the audience (Myers 1994), or increasing the global reach of messages (Garrido and Halavais 2003). Other authors have stressed the spread of online activism to new types of participants and to address novel issues (Earl and Kimport 2009). However, little is known thus far about the processes involved and how far different types of diffusion have already progressed (but see Earl 2010 for a theoretical review of potential broad types of diffusion relevant to online protest).

AB - There has been substantial interest in Internet activism among academics from a wide spectrum of fields over the past decade. Whether studying unlikely Internet phenoms such as the Zapatistas (e.g., Garrido and Halavais 2003), theorizing about the relationship between information technology and social movements (e.g., Tarrow 1998b; Tilly 2004), or examining how specific protest tactics, such as online petitions, have made their way online (Earl 2006a; Earl and Schussman 2007; Earl and Kimport 2008), researchers have been working to understand the impacts of a large array of new digital technologies. One question that has been raised, but far from sufficiently answered, involves the dynamics of diffusion online. For instance, a number of scholars have argued that Internet usage can lead to changes in the scale of organizing (Foot and Schneider 2002) by increasing the speed of diffusion (Ayres 1999), increasing the size of the audience (Myers 1994), or increasing the global reach of messages (Garrido and Halavais 2003). Other authors have stressed the spread of online activism to new types of participants and to address novel issues (Earl and Kimport 2009). However, little is known thus far about the processes involved and how far different types of diffusion have already progressed (but see Earl 2010 for a theoretical review of potential broad types of diffusion relevant to online protest).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84917433687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84917433687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511761638.008

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511761638.008

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84917433687

SN - 9780511761638

SN - 9780521193733

SP - 125

EP - 139

BT - The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -