The double-edged nature of recovery in first-episode psychosis

Ellen B. Rubinstein, Nicholas Jk Breitborde

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Growing research has highlighted that the first few years of psychotic illnesses constitute a “critical period” in which (i) the majority of the functional deterioration that accompanies these illnesses occurs, and (ii) individuals are most responsive to both pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for psychosis and its deleterious sequelae. Clinical interest in intervening earlier in psychotic episodes, and what early intervention might mean for a person’s symptom reduction and social functioning, has emerged within a decades-long history of social science research on the concept of recovery. In this article, we describe the intersection between that long-standing interest in recovery and the more recent attention to first-episode psychosis to explore conundrums that may arise as clinicians engage with their clients following a first episode of psychosis. We suggest ways of addressing these situations by highlighting several complementary or alternative approaches to traditional psychiatric treatment and conclude with a call to rethink ways of doing research on recovery in first-episode psychosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-365
Number of pages9
JournalCurrent Psychiatry Reviews
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychotic Disorders
Research
Social Sciences
Psychiatry
Pharmacology

Keywords

  • Agency
  • Antipsychotic medication
  • First-episode psychosis
  • Meaning
  • Qualitative research
  • Recovery
  • Service-based definitions
  • User-based definitions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The double-edged nature of recovery in first-episode psychosis. / Rubinstein, Ellen B.; Breitborde, Nicholas Jk.

In: Current Psychiatry Reviews, Vol. 12, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 357-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{4b22a543ac2348038de5ec1577159139,
title = "The double-edged nature of recovery in first-episode psychosis",
abstract = "Growing research has highlighted that the first few years of psychotic illnesses constitute a “critical period” in which (i) the majority of the functional deterioration that accompanies these illnesses occurs, and (ii) individuals are most responsive to both pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for psychosis and its deleterious sequelae. Clinical interest in intervening earlier in psychotic episodes, and what early intervention might mean for a person’s symptom reduction and social functioning, has emerged within a decades-long history of social science research on the concept of recovery. In this article, we describe the intersection between that long-standing interest in recovery and the more recent attention to first-episode psychosis to explore conundrums that may arise as clinicians engage with their clients following a first episode of psychosis. We suggest ways of addressing these situations by highlighting several complementary or alternative approaches to traditional psychiatric treatment and conclude with a call to rethink ways of doing research on recovery in first-episode psychosis.",
keywords = "Agency, Antipsychotic medication, First-episode psychosis, Meaning, Qualitative research, Recovery, Service-based definitions, User-based definitions",
author = "Rubinstein, {Ellen B.} and Breitborde, {Nicholas Jk}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2174/1573400512666160927143712",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "357--365",
journal = "Current Psychiatry Reviews",
issn = "1573-4005",
publisher = "Bentham Science Publishers B.V.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The double-edged nature of recovery in first-episode psychosis

AU - Rubinstein, Ellen B.

AU - Breitborde, Nicholas Jk

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Growing research has highlighted that the first few years of psychotic illnesses constitute a “critical period” in which (i) the majority of the functional deterioration that accompanies these illnesses occurs, and (ii) individuals are most responsive to both pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for psychosis and its deleterious sequelae. Clinical interest in intervening earlier in psychotic episodes, and what early intervention might mean for a person’s symptom reduction and social functioning, has emerged within a decades-long history of social science research on the concept of recovery. In this article, we describe the intersection between that long-standing interest in recovery and the more recent attention to first-episode psychosis to explore conundrums that may arise as clinicians engage with their clients following a first episode of psychosis. We suggest ways of addressing these situations by highlighting several complementary or alternative approaches to traditional psychiatric treatment and conclude with a call to rethink ways of doing research on recovery in first-episode psychosis.

AB - Growing research has highlighted that the first few years of psychotic illnesses constitute a “critical period” in which (i) the majority of the functional deterioration that accompanies these illnesses occurs, and (ii) individuals are most responsive to both pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for psychosis and its deleterious sequelae. Clinical interest in intervening earlier in psychotic episodes, and what early intervention might mean for a person’s symptom reduction and social functioning, has emerged within a decades-long history of social science research on the concept of recovery. In this article, we describe the intersection between that long-standing interest in recovery and the more recent attention to first-episode psychosis to explore conundrums that may arise as clinicians engage with their clients following a first episode of psychosis. We suggest ways of addressing these situations by highlighting several complementary or alternative approaches to traditional psychiatric treatment and conclude with a call to rethink ways of doing research on recovery in first-episode psychosis.

KW - Agency

KW - Antipsychotic medication

KW - First-episode psychosis

KW - Meaning

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Recovery

KW - Service-based definitions

KW - User-based definitions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012101506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012101506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2174/1573400512666160927143712

DO - 10.2174/1573400512666160927143712

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

SP - 357

EP - 365

JO - Current Psychiatry Reviews

JF - Current Psychiatry Reviews

SN - 1573-4005

IS - 4

ER -