The effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with tremolo and brightness for distinguishing clinically important oxygen saturation ranges: A laboratory study

E. Paterson, P. M. Sanderson, N. A.B. Paterson, D. Liu, Robert G Loeb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our study examined the effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with acoustic tremolo and brightness to help listeners differentiate clinically relevant oxygen saturation ranges. In a series of trials lasting 30 s each, 76 undergraduate participants identified final oxygen saturation range (Target: 100% to 97%; Low: 96% to 90%; Critical: 89% and below), and detected threshold transitions into and out of the target range using conventional sonification (n = 38) or enhanced sonification (n = 38). Median (IQR [range]) accuracy for range identification with the conventional sonification was 80 (70-85 [45-95])%, whereas with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (99-100 [80-100])%; p < 0.001. Accuracy for detecting threshold transitions with the conventional sonification was 60 (50-75 [30-95])%, but with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (95-100 [75-100]%; p < 0.001. Participants can identify clinically meaningful oxygen saturation ranges and detect threshold transitions more accurately with enhanced sonification than with conventional sonification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)565-572
Number of pages8
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume71
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Oximetry
Oxygen
Acoustics

Keywords

  • auditory alarms
  • auditory displays
  • patient monitoring
  • pulse oximetry
  • sonification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

The effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with tremolo and brightness for distinguishing clinically important oxygen saturation ranges : A laboratory study. / Paterson, E.; Sanderson, P. M.; Paterson, N. A.B.; Liu, D.; Loeb, Robert G.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 71, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. 565-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3e7b3acbf4684c1d8b87f188c120f39c,
title = "The effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with tremolo and brightness for distinguishing clinically important oxygen saturation ranges: A laboratory study",
abstract = "Our study examined the effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with acoustic tremolo and brightness to help listeners differentiate clinically relevant oxygen saturation ranges. In a series of trials lasting 30 s each, 76 undergraduate participants identified final oxygen saturation range (Target: 100{\%} to 97{\%}; Low: 96{\%} to 90{\%}; Critical: 89{\%} and below), and detected threshold transitions into and out of the target range using conventional sonification (n = 38) or enhanced sonification (n = 38). Median (IQR [range]) accuracy for range identification with the conventional sonification was 80 (70-85 [45-95]){\%}, whereas with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (99-100 [80-100]){\%}; p < 0.001. Accuracy for detecting threshold transitions with the conventional sonification was 60 (50-75 [30-95]){\%}, but with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (95-100 [75-100]{\%}; p < 0.001. Participants can identify clinically meaningful oxygen saturation ranges and detect threshold transitions more accurately with enhanced sonification than with conventional sonification.",
keywords = "auditory alarms, auditory displays, patient monitoring, pulse oximetry, sonification",
author = "E. Paterson and Sanderson, {P. M.} and Paterson, {N. A.B.} and D. Liu and Loeb, {Robert G}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/anae.13424",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "565--572",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with tremolo and brightness for distinguishing clinically important oxygen saturation ranges

T2 - A laboratory study

AU - Paterson, E.

AU - Sanderson, P. M.

AU - Paterson, N. A.B.

AU - Liu, D.

AU - Loeb, Robert G

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Our study examined the effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with acoustic tremolo and brightness to help listeners differentiate clinically relevant oxygen saturation ranges. In a series of trials lasting 30 s each, 76 undergraduate participants identified final oxygen saturation range (Target: 100% to 97%; Low: 96% to 90%; Critical: 89% and below), and detected threshold transitions into and out of the target range using conventional sonification (n = 38) or enhanced sonification (n = 38). Median (IQR [range]) accuracy for range identification with the conventional sonification was 80 (70-85 [45-95])%, whereas with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (99-100 [80-100])%; p < 0.001. Accuracy for detecting threshold transitions with the conventional sonification was 60 (50-75 [30-95])%, but with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (95-100 [75-100]%; p < 0.001. Participants can identify clinically meaningful oxygen saturation ranges and detect threshold transitions more accurately with enhanced sonification than with conventional sonification.

AB - Our study examined the effectiveness of pulse oximetry sonification enhanced with acoustic tremolo and brightness to help listeners differentiate clinically relevant oxygen saturation ranges. In a series of trials lasting 30 s each, 76 undergraduate participants identified final oxygen saturation range (Target: 100% to 97%; Low: 96% to 90%; Critical: 89% and below), and detected threshold transitions into and out of the target range using conventional sonification (n = 38) or enhanced sonification (n = 38). Median (IQR [range]) accuracy for range identification with the conventional sonification was 80 (70-85 [45-95])%, whereas with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (99-100 [80-100])%; p < 0.001. Accuracy for detecting threshold transitions with the conventional sonification was 60 (50-75 [30-95])%, but with the enhanced sonification it was 100 (95-100 [75-100]%; p < 0.001. Participants can identify clinically meaningful oxygen saturation ranges and detect threshold transitions more accurately with enhanced sonification than with conventional sonification.

KW - auditory alarms

KW - auditory displays

KW - patient monitoring

KW - pulse oximetry

KW - sonification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982896886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982896886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/anae.13424

DO - 10.1111/anae.13424

M3 - Article

C2 - 26990198

AN - SCOPUS:84982896886

VL - 71

SP - 565

EP - 572

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 5

ER -