The Effects of Alternative Labels on Decision Behavior: The Case of Corporate Site Selection Decisions

Stephen W Gilliland, Lisa Wood, Neal Schmitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The influence of alternative labels on decision processes and outcomes were examined in a multidimensional decision task with realistic decision information and experienced decision makers. Based on prior research, it was predicted that labels would influence selection and ratings of decision alternatives, as well as the extent of information search and the information search strategies. Subjects (n = 26) experienced in making and/or aiding business relocation decisions completed two computer controlled site selection tasks: one with labeled locations and one with unlabeled locations. Results indicated that labeling influenced both decision processes and location ratings. An interaction between order of task completion and labeling suggested that labeling effects on decision making may be minimized if an unlabeled task is completed prior to a labeled task. Implications and limitations are discussed in terms of labeling effects and decision quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)406-427
Number of pages22
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Research
Site selection
Labeling
Decision process
Rating
Information search

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

The Effects of Alternative Labels on Decision Behavior : The Case of Corporate Site Selection Decisions. / Gilliland, Stephen W; Wood, Lisa; Schmitt, Neal.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 58, No. 3, 06.1994, p. 406-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64452b49a9c441359a4e227611aae6ea,
title = "The Effects of Alternative Labels on Decision Behavior: The Case of Corporate Site Selection Decisions",
abstract = "The influence of alternative labels on decision processes and outcomes were examined in a multidimensional decision task with realistic decision information and experienced decision makers. Based on prior research, it was predicted that labels would influence selection and ratings of decision alternatives, as well as the extent of information search and the information search strategies. Subjects (n = 26) experienced in making and/or aiding business relocation decisions completed two computer controlled site selection tasks: one with labeled locations and one with unlabeled locations. Results indicated that labeling influenced both decision processes and location ratings. An interaction between order of task completion and labeling suggested that labeling effects on decision making may be minimized if an unlabeled task is completed prior to a labeled task. Implications and limitations are discussed in terms of labeling effects and decision quality.",
author = "Gilliland, {Stephen W} and Lisa Wood and Neal Schmitt",
year = "1994",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1006/obhd.1994.1044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "406--427",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Alternative Labels on Decision Behavior

T2 - The Case of Corporate Site Selection Decisions

AU - Gilliland, Stephen W

AU - Wood, Lisa

AU - Schmitt, Neal

PY - 1994/6

Y1 - 1994/6

N2 - The influence of alternative labels on decision processes and outcomes were examined in a multidimensional decision task with realistic decision information and experienced decision makers. Based on prior research, it was predicted that labels would influence selection and ratings of decision alternatives, as well as the extent of information search and the information search strategies. Subjects (n = 26) experienced in making and/or aiding business relocation decisions completed two computer controlled site selection tasks: one with labeled locations and one with unlabeled locations. Results indicated that labeling influenced both decision processes and location ratings. An interaction between order of task completion and labeling suggested that labeling effects on decision making may be minimized if an unlabeled task is completed prior to a labeled task. Implications and limitations are discussed in terms of labeling effects and decision quality.

AB - The influence of alternative labels on decision processes and outcomes were examined in a multidimensional decision task with realistic decision information and experienced decision makers. Based on prior research, it was predicted that labels would influence selection and ratings of decision alternatives, as well as the extent of information search and the information search strategies. Subjects (n = 26) experienced in making and/or aiding business relocation decisions completed two computer controlled site selection tasks: one with labeled locations and one with unlabeled locations. Results indicated that labeling influenced both decision processes and location ratings. An interaction between order of task completion and labeling suggested that labeling effects on decision making may be minimized if an unlabeled task is completed prior to a labeled task. Implications and limitations are discussed in terms of labeling effects and decision quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149146665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149146665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.1994.1044

DO - 10.1006/obhd.1994.1044

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38149146665

VL - 58

SP - 406

EP - 427

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 3

ER -