The Effects of Interview Schedule Variations On Reported Sexual Behavior

John Delamater, Patricia Maccorquodale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Discussions of survey research often assert that characteristics of the schedule affect the data obtained, particularly when the topic is “sensitive.” This research varied three aspects of an interview schedule designed to measure sexual behavior: (1) whether behavior was assessed by interviewer questions or a self-administered questionnaire; (2) the location of questions concerning sexual experience (at the middle or at the end of the interview); and (3) the order or sequence of questions concerning current behavior, partner's characteristics, and partner's ideology. Interviews were conducted with four subsamples of young adults: single male university undergraduates (n = 432), single female undergraduates (429), single male nonstudents (220), and single female nonstudents (293). The results indicate that none of the variations had any substantial effect on reported sexual behavior. These findings are consistent with other analyses in suggesting that such methodological variations are not a major source of differential responses in surveys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-236
Number of pages22
JournalSociological Methods & Research
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1975
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

interview
survey research
young adult
ideology
questionnaire
university
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The Effects of Interview Schedule Variations On Reported Sexual Behavior. / Delamater, John; Maccorquodale, Patricia.

In: Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1975, p. 215-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a32b7491fd7744479c61e3b0693c793d,
title = "The Effects of Interview Schedule Variations On Reported Sexual Behavior",
abstract = "Discussions of survey research often assert that characteristics of the schedule affect the data obtained, particularly when the topic is “sensitive.” This research varied three aspects of an interview schedule designed to measure sexual behavior: (1) whether behavior was assessed by interviewer questions or a self-administered questionnaire; (2) the location of questions concerning sexual experience (at the middle or at the end of the interview); and (3) the order or sequence of questions concerning current behavior, partner's characteristics, and partner's ideology. Interviews were conducted with four subsamples of young adults: single male university undergraduates (n = 432), single female undergraduates (429), single male nonstudents (220), and single female nonstudents (293). The results indicate that none of the variations had any substantial effect on reported sexual behavior. These findings are consistent with other analyses in suggesting that such methodological variations are not a major source of differential responses in surveys.",
author = "John Delamater and Patricia Maccorquodale",
year = "1975",
doi = "10.1177/004912417500400204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "215--236",
journal = "Sociological Methods and Research",
issn = "0049-1241",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Interview Schedule Variations On Reported Sexual Behavior

AU - Delamater, John

AU - Maccorquodale, Patricia

PY - 1975

Y1 - 1975

N2 - Discussions of survey research often assert that characteristics of the schedule affect the data obtained, particularly when the topic is “sensitive.” This research varied three aspects of an interview schedule designed to measure sexual behavior: (1) whether behavior was assessed by interviewer questions or a self-administered questionnaire; (2) the location of questions concerning sexual experience (at the middle or at the end of the interview); and (3) the order or sequence of questions concerning current behavior, partner's characteristics, and partner's ideology. Interviews were conducted with four subsamples of young adults: single male university undergraduates (n = 432), single female undergraduates (429), single male nonstudents (220), and single female nonstudents (293). The results indicate that none of the variations had any substantial effect on reported sexual behavior. These findings are consistent with other analyses in suggesting that such methodological variations are not a major source of differential responses in surveys.

AB - Discussions of survey research often assert that characteristics of the schedule affect the data obtained, particularly when the topic is “sensitive.” This research varied three aspects of an interview schedule designed to measure sexual behavior: (1) whether behavior was assessed by interviewer questions or a self-administered questionnaire; (2) the location of questions concerning sexual experience (at the middle or at the end of the interview); and (3) the order or sequence of questions concerning current behavior, partner's characteristics, and partner's ideology. Interviews were conducted with four subsamples of young adults: single male university undergraduates (n = 432), single female undergraduates (429), single male nonstudents (220), and single female nonstudents (293). The results indicate that none of the variations had any substantial effect on reported sexual behavior. These findings are consistent with other analyses in suggesting that such methodological variations are not a major source of differential responses in surveys.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970258370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970258370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/004912417500400204

DO - 10.1177/004912417500400204

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 215

EP - 236

JO - Sociological Methods and Research

JF - Sociological Methods and Research

SN - 0049-1241

IS - 2

ER -