The effects of managerial regulatory fit priming on reactions to explanations

Andrew Li, Joel Evans, Michael S. Christian, Stephen W Gilliland, Edgar E. Kausel, Jordan H. Stein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the interactive effects of regulatory focus priming and message framing on the perceived fairness of unfavorable events. We hypothesized that individuals' perceptions of fairness are higher when they receive a regulatory focus prime (promotion versus prevention) that is congruent with the framing of an explanation (gain versus loss), as opposed to one that is incongruent. We also hypothesized that these effects are mediated by counterfactual thinking. Three studies revealed that primed regulatory fit (promotion/gain or prevention/loss) led to higher levels of justice perceptions than regulatory misfit (promotion/loss or prevention/gain). Additionally, " could" and " should" counterfactuals partially mediated the relationship between regulatory fit and interactional justice (Study 3).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-282
Number of pages15
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume115
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Priming
Regulatory fit
Regulatory focus

Keywords

  • Counterfactual thinking
  • Explanation
  • Organizational justice
  • Regulatory fit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

The effects of managerial regulatory fit priming on reactions to explanations. / Li, Andrew; Evans, Joel; Christian, Michael S.; Gilliland, Stephen W; Kausel, Edgar E.; Stein, Jordan H.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 115, No. 2, 07.2011, p. 268-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Andrew ; Evans, Joel ; Christian, Michael S. ; Gilliland, Stephen W ; Kausel, Edgar E. ; Stein, Jordan H. / The effects of managerial regulatory fit priming on reactions to explanations. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2011 ; Vol. 115, No. 2. pp. 268-282.
@article{c6dc530c97274c23a0ba4150da242909,
title = "The effects of managerial regulatory fit priming on reactions to explanations",
abstract = "We investigated the interactive effects of regulatory focus priming and message framing on the perceived fairness of unfavorable events. We hypothesized that individuals' perceptions of fairness are higher when they receive a regulatory focus prime (promotion versus prevention) that is congruent with the framing of an explanation (gain versus loss), as opposed to one that is incongruent. We also hypothesized that these effects are mediated by counterfactual thinking. Three studies revealed that primed regulatory fit (promotion/gain or prevention/loss) led to higher levels of justice perceptions than regulatory misfit (promotion/loss or prevention/gain). Additionally, {"} could{"} and {"} should{"} counterfactuals partially mediated the relationship between regulatory fit and interactional justice (Study 3).",
keywords = "Counterfactual thinking, Explanation, Organizational justice, Regulatory fit",
author = "Andrew Li and Joel Evans and Christian, {Michael S.} and Gilliland, {Stephen W} and Kausel, {Edgar E.} and Stein, {Jordan H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "268--282",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of managerial regulatory fit priming on reactions to explanations

AU - Li, Andrew

AU - Evans, Joel

AU - Christian, Michael S.

AU - Gilliland, Stephen W

AU - Kausel, Edgar E.

AU - Stein, Jordan H.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - We investigated the interactive effects of regulatory focus priming and message framing on the perceived fairness of unfavorable events. We hypothesized that individuals' perceptions of fairness are higher when they receive a regulatory focus prime (promotion versus prevention) that is congruent with the framing of an explanation (gain versus loss), as opposed to one that is incongruent. We also hypothesized that these effects are mediated by counterfactual thinking. Three studies revealed that primed regulatory fit (promotion/gain or prevention/loss) led to higher levels of justice perceptions than regulatory misfit (promotion/loss or prevention/gain). Additionally, " could" and " should" counterfactuals partially mediated the relationship between regulatory fit and interactional justice (Study 3).

AB - We investigated the interactive effects of regulatory focus priming and message framing on the perceived fairness of unfavorable events. We hypothesized that individuals' perceptions of fairness are higher when they receive a regulatory focus prime (promotion versus prevention) that is congruent with the framing of an explanation (gain versus loss), as opposed to one that is incongruent. We also hypothesized that these effects are mediated by counterfactual thinking. Three studies revealed that primed regulatory fit (promotion/gain or prevention/loss) led to higher levels of justice perceptions than regulatory misfit (promotion/loss or prevention/gain). Additionally, " could" and " should" counterfactuals partially mediated the relationship between regulatory fit and interactional justice (Study 3).

KW - Counterfactual thinking

KW - Explanation

KW - Organizational justice

KW - Regulatory fit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956280135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956280135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79956280135

VL - 115

SP - 268

EP - 282

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 2

ER -