The Effects of Spatial Scale and Aggregation on Food Access Assessment

A Case Study of Tucson, Arizona

Katharine Yang Bao, Daoqin Tong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Adequate access to healthy food has become a social issue due to the recent Great Recession and heightened levels of unemployment. Geographers have focused their attention on how to accurately evaluate food access and how to identify and delineate food deserts; that is, low-income neighborhoods where affordable and healthy food is lacking or limited. Findings of recent food access studies are, however, dramatically inconsistent. We argue that spatial scale and the level of aggregation used in constructing food access measures could account for a major portion of the varying results. We draw on an empirical study in the Tucson, Arizona, metropolitan area, to examine how varying geographic scales and aggregation methods affect food access assessment. We also provide an analysis to show how spatial scale and aggregation practices lead to inconsistent conclusions about food access and designation of food deserts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-347
Number of pages11
JournalProfessional Geographer
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2017

Fingerprint

aggregation
food
desert
effect
social issue
unemployment
recession
metropolitan area
agglomeration area
low income
income

Keywords

  • aggregation
  • food access
  • food desert
  • spatial scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

The Effects of Spatial Scale and Aggregation on Food Access Assessment : A Case Study of Tucson, Arizona. / Bao, Katharine Yang; Tong, Daoqin.

In: Professional Geographer, Vol. 69, No. 3, 03.07.2017, p. 337-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce2e6ca9e38a430a996a6c8539e35f19,
title = "The Effects of Spatial Scale and Aggregation on Food Access Assessment: A Case Study of Tucson, Arizona",
abstract = "Adequate access to healthy food has become a social issue due to the recent Great Recession and heightened levels of unemployment. Geographers have focused their attention on how to accurately evaluate food access and how to identify and delineate food deserts; that is, low-income neighborhoods where affordable and healthy food is lacking or limited. Findings of recent food access studies are, however, dramatically inconsistent. We argue that spatial scale and the level of aggregation used in constructing food access measures could account for a major portion of the varying results. We draw on an empirical study in the Tucson, Arizona, metropolitan area, to examine how varying geographic scales and aggregation methods affect food access assessment. We also provide an analysis to show how spatial scale and aggregation practices lead to inconsistent conclusions about food access and designation of food deserts.",
keywords = "aggregation, food access, food desert, spatial scale",
author = "Bao, {Katharine Yang} and Daoqin Tong",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00330124.2016.1252271",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "337--347",
journal = "Professional Geographer",
issn = "0033-0124",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Spatial Scale and Aggregation on Food Access Assessment

T2 - A Case Study of Tucson, Arizona

AU - Bao, Katharine Yang

AU - Tong, Daoqin

PY - 2017/7/3

Y1 - 2017/7/3

N2 - Adequate access to healthy food has become a social issue due to the recent Great Recession and heightened levels of unemployment. Geographers have focused their attention on how to accurately evaluate food access and how to identify and delineate food deserts; that is, low-income neighborhoods where affordable and healthy food is lacking or limited. Findings of recent food access studies are, however, dramatically inconsistent. We argue that spatial scale and the level of aggregation used in constructing food access measures could account for a major portion of the varying results. We draw on an empirical study in the Tucson, Arizona, metropolitan area, to examine how varying geographic scales and aggregation methods affect food access assessment. We also provide an analysis to show how spatial scale and aggregation practices lead to inconsistent conclusions about food access and designation of food deserts.

AB - Adequate access to healthy food has become a social issue due to the recent Great Recession and heightened levels of unemployment. Geographers have focused their attention on how to accurately evaluate food access and how to identify and delineate food deserts; that is, low-income neighborhoods where affordable and healthy food is lacking or limited. Findings of recent food access studies are, however, dramatically inconsistent. We argue that spatial scale and the level of aggregation used in constructing food access measures could account for a major portion of the varying results. We draw on an empirical study in the Tucson, Arizona, metropolitan area, to examine how varying geographic scales and aggregation methods affect food access assessment. We also provide an analysis to show how spatial scale and aggregation practices lead to inconsistent conclusions about food access and designation of food deserts.

KW - aggregation

KW - food access

KW - food desert

KW - spatial scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006136664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006136664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00330124.2016.1252271

DO - 10.1080/00330124.2016.1252271

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 337

EP - 347

JO - Professional Geographer

JF - Professional Geographer

SN - 0033-0124

IS - 3

ER -