The Effects of Vocalics and Nonverbal Sensitivity on Compliance A Replication and Extension

DAVID B. BULLER, Judee K Burgoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An interaction between receiver ability to decode vocalic cues and speaker vocalic patterns in obtaining compliance was investigated in this study. Expectancy theory was offered as an explanation for this interaction. Because changes in vocalic patterns can violate expectations, receivers make consistent interpretations of these vocalic cues, and evaluations of these interpretations may be affected by decoder predispositions toward communication that, in turn, produce differential perceptions of source reward. Respondents were interviewed by trained encoders who used neutral, pleasant, and hostile vocal patterns. Compliance was assessed by asking for a donation of time to communication research. Follow‐up surveys measured perceived relational messages, interviewer credibility, vocal pleasantness, and the degree to which the vocalic pattern was expected. The predicted disordinal interaction between decoding ability and voice condition was found. Decoding ability did not correlate with predispositions, nullifying source reward as a factor in the evaluation of vocalic violations. It was suggested that preferences for vocalic patterns influenced evaluations: Good decoders may have preferred affiliative cues and thus complied more with pleasant voices, whereas poor decoders may have preferred assertive patterns and complied more with hostile voices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-144
Number of pages19
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Compliance
Cues
Reward
Decoding
reward
ability
recipient
interaction
evaluation
Communication
interpretation
communication research
donation
credibility
Interviews
communication
interview
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The Effects of Vocalics and Nonverbal Sensitivity on Compliance A Replication and Extension. / BULLER, DAVID B.; Burgoon, Judee K.

In: Human Communication Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1986, p. 126-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{54a32062fa784ce1922387f82b4456a7,
title = "The Effects of Vocalics and Nonverbal Sensitivity on Compliance A Replication and Extension",
abstract = "An interaction between receiver ability to decode vocalic cues and speaker vocalic patterns in obtaining compliance was investigated in this study. Expectancy theory was offered as an explanation for this interaction. Because changes in vocalic patterns can violate expectations, receivers make consistent interpretations of these vocalic cues, and evaluations of these interpretations may be affected by decoder predispositions toward communication that, in turn, produce differential perceptions of source reward. Respondents were interviewed by trained encoders who used neutral, pleasant, and hostile vocal patterns. Compliance was assessed by asking for a donation of time to communication research. Follow‐up surveys measured perceived relational messages, interviewer credibility, vocal pleasantness, and the degree to which the vocalic pattern was expected. The predicted disordinal interaction between decoding ability and voice condition was found. Decoding ability did not correlate with predispositions, nullifying source reward as a factor in the evaluation of vocalic violations. It was suggested that preferences for vocalic patterns influenced evaluations: Good decoders may have preferred affiliative cues and thus complied more with pleasant voices, whereas poor decoders may have preferred assertive patterns and complied more with hostile voices.",
author = "BULLER, {DAVID B.} and Burgoon, {Judee K}",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00098.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "126--144",
journal = "Human Communication Research",
issn = "0360-3989",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of Vocalics and Nonverbal Sensitivity on Compliance A Replication and Extension

AU - BULLER, DAVID B.

AU - Burgoon, Judee K

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - An interaction between receiver ability to decode vocalic cues and speaker vocalic patterns in obtaining compliance was investigated in this study. Expectancy theory was offered as an explanation for this interaction. Because changes in vocalic patterns can violate expectations, receivers make consistent interpretations of these vocalic cues, and evaluations of these interpretations may be affected by decoder predispositions toward communication that, in turn, produce differential perceptions of source reward. Respondents were interviewed by trained encoders who used neutral, pleasant, and hostile vocal patterns. Compliance was assessed by asking for a donation of time to communication research. Follow‐up surveys measured perceived relational messages, interviewer credibility, vocal pleasantness, and the degree to which the vocalic pattern was expected. The predicted disordinal interaction between decoding ability and voice condition was found. Decoding ability did not correlate with predispositions, nullifying source reward as a factor in the evaluation of vocalic violations. It was suggested that preferences for vocalic patterns influenced evaluations: Good decoders may have preferred affiliative cues and thus complied more with pleasant voices, whereas poor decoders may have preferred assertive patterns and complied more with hostile voices.

AB - An interaction between receiver ability to decode vocalic cues and speaker vocalic patterns in obtaining compliance was investigated in this study. Expectancy theory was offered as an explanation for this interaction. Because changes in vocalic patterns can violate expectations, receivers make consistent interpretations of these vocalic cues, and evaluations of these interpretations may be affected by decoder predispositions toward communication that, in turn, produce differential perceptions of source reward. Respondents were interviewed by trained encoders who used neutral, pleasant, and hostile vocal patterns. Compliance was assessed by asking for a donation of time to communication research. Follow‐up surveys measured perceived relational messages, interviewer credibility, vocal pleasantness, and the degree to which the vocalic pattern was expected. The predicted disordinal interaction between decoding ability and voice condition was found. Decoding ability did not correlate with predispositions, nullifying source reward as a factor in the evaluation of vocalic violations. It was suggested that preferences for vocalic patterns influenced evaluations: Good decoders may have preferred affiliative cues and thus complied more with pleasant voices, whereas poor decoders may have preferred assertive patterns and complied more with hostile voices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986398303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986398303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00098.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00098.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986398303

VL - 13

SP - 126

EP - 144

JO - Human Communication Research

JF - Human Communication Research

SN - 0360-3989

IS - 1

ER -