The electrocardiographic exercise test in a population with reduced workup bias: Diagnostic performance, computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction

Victor F. Froelicher, Kenneth G. Lehmann, Ronald Thomas, Steven Goldman, Douglas Morrison, Robert Edson, Philip Lavori, Jonathan Myers, Charles Dennis, Ralph Shabetai, Dat Do, Jeffrey Froning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

158 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Empirical scores, computerized ST-segment measurements, and equations have been proposed as tools for improving the diagnostic performance of the exercise test. Objective: To compare the diagnostic utility of these scores, measurements, and equations with that of visual ST- segment measurements in patients with reduced workup bias. Design: Prospective analysis. Setting: 12 university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Patients: 814 consecutive patients who presented with angina pectoris and agreed to undergo both exercise testing and coronary angiography. Measurements: Digital electrocardiographic recorders and angiographic calipers were used for testing at each site, and test results were sent to core laboratories. Results: Although 25% of patients had previously had testing, workup bias was reduced, as shown by comparison with a pilot study group. This reduction resulted in a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 85% for visual analysis. Computerized measurements and visual analysis had similar diagnostic power. Equations incorporating nonelectrocardiographic variables and either visual or computerized ST- segment measurement had similar discrimination and were superior to single ST-segment measurements. These equations correctly classified 5 more patients of every 100 tested (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.80 for equations and 0.68 for visual analysis; P < 0.001) in this population with a 50% prevalence of disease. Conclusions: Standard exercise tests had lower sensitivity but higher specificity in this population with reduced work-up bias than in previous studies. Computerized ST-segment measurements were similar to visual ST-segment measurements made by cardiologists. Considering more than ST-segment measurements can enhance the diagnostic power of the exercise test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)965-974
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume128
Issue number12 PART 1
StatePublished - Jun 15 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise Test
Population
Angina Pectoris
Veterans
Coronary Angiography
ROC Curve
Exercise
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The electrocardiographic exercise test in a population with reduced workup bias : Diagnostic performance, computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction. / Froelicher, Victor F.; Lehmann, Kenneth G.; Thomas, Ronald; Goldman, Steven; Morrison, Douglas; Edson, Robert; Lavori, Philip; Myers, Jonathan; Dennis, Charles; Shabetai, Ralph; Do, Dat; Froning, Jeffrey.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 128, No. 12 PART 1, 15.06.1998, p. 965-974.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Froelicher, VF, Lehmann, KG, Thomas, R, Goldman, S, Morrison, D, Edson, R, Lavori, P, Myers, J, Dennis, C, Shabetai, R, Do, D & Froning, J 1998, 'The electrocardiographic exercise test in a population with reduced workup bias: Diagnostic performance, computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction', Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 128, no. 12 PART 1, pp. 965-974.
Froelicher, Victor F. ; Lehmann, Kenneth G. ; Thomas, Ronald ; Goldman, Steven ; Morrison, Douglas ; Edson, Robert ; Lavori, Philip ; Myers, Jonathan ; Dennis, Charles ; Shabetai, Ralph ; Do, Dat ; Froning, Jeffrey. / The electrocardiographic exercise test in a population with reduced workup bias : Diagnostic performance, computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction. In: Annals of Internal Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 128, No. 12 PART 1. pp. 965-974.
@article{85cd1d424c6b414dad824c54b8ad143f,
title = "The electrocardiographic exercise test in a population with reduced workup bias: Diagnostic performance, computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction",
abstract = "Background: Empirical scores, computerized ST-segment measurements, and equations have been proposed as tools for improving the diagnostic performance of the exercise test. Objective: To compare the diagnostic utility of these scores, measurements, and equations with that of visual ST- segment measurements in patients with reduced workup bias. Design: Prospective analysis. Setting: 12 university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Patients: 814 consecutive patients who presented with angina pectoris and agreed to undergo both exercise testing and coronary angiography. Measurements: Digital electrocardiographic recorders and angiographic calipers were used for testing at each site, and test results were sent to core laboratories. Results: Although 25{\%} of patients had previously had testing, workup bias was reduced, as shown by comparison with a pilot study group. This reduction resulted in a sensitivity of 45{\%} and a specificity of 85{\%} for visual analysis. Computerized measurements and visual analysis had similar diagnostic power. Equations incorporating nonelectrocardiographic variables and either visual or computerized ST- segment measurement had similar discrimination and were superior to single ST-segment measurements. These equations correctly classified 5 more patients of every 100 tested (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.80 for equations and 0.68 for visual analysis; P < 0.001) in this population with a 50{\%} prevalence of disease. Conclusions: Standard exercise tests had lower sensitivity but higher specificity in this population with reduced work-up bias than in previous studies. Computerized ST-segment measurements were similar to visual ST-segment measurements made by cardiologists. Considering more than ST-segment measurements can enhance the diagnostic power of the exercise test.",
author = "Froelicher, {Victor F.} and Lehmann, {Kenneth G.} and Ronald Thomas and Steven Goldman and Douglas Morrison and Robert Edson and Philip Lavori and Jonathan Myers and Charles Dennis and Ralph Shabetai and Dat Do and Jeffrey Froning",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "965--974",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "12 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The electrocardiographic exercise test in a population with reduced workup bias

T2 - Diagnostic performance, computerized interpretation, and multivariable prediction

AU - Froelicher, Victor F.

AU - Lehmann, Kenneth G.

AU - Thomas, Ronald

AU - Goldman, Steven

AU - Morrison, Douglas

AU - Edson, Robert

AU - Lavori, Philip

AU - Myers, Jonathan

AU - Dennis, Charles

AU - Shabetai, Ralph

AU - Do, Dat

AU - Froning, Jeffrey

PY - 1998/6/15

Y1 - 1998/6/15

N2 - Background: Empirical scores, computerized ST-segment measurements, and equations have been proposed as tools for improving the diagnostic performance of the exercise test. Objective: To compare the diagnostic utility of these scores, measurements, and equations with that of visual ST- segment measurements in patients with reduced workup bias. Design: Prospective analysis. Setting: 12 university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Patients: 814 consecutive patients who presented with angina pectoris and agreed to undergo both exercise testing and coronary angiography. Measurements: Digital electrocardiographic recorders and angiographic calipers were used for testing at each site, and test results were sent to core laboratories. Results: Although 25% of patients had previously had testing, workup bias was reduced, as shown by comparison with a pilot study group. This reduction resulted in a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 85% for visual analysis. Computerized measurements and visual analysis had similar diagnostic power. Equations incorporating nonelectrocardiographic variables and either visual or computerized ST- segment measurement had similar discrimination and were superior to single ST-segment measurements. These equations correctly classified 5 more patients of every 100 tested (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.80 for equations and 0.68 for visual analysis; P < 0.001) in this population with a 50% prevalence of disease. Conclusions: Standard exercise tests had lower sensitivity but higher specificity in this population with reduced work-up bias than in previous studies. Computerized ST-segment measurements were similar to visual ST-segment measurements made by cardiologists. Considering more than ST-segment measurements can enhance the diagnostic power of the exercise test.

AB - Background: Empirical scores, computerized ST-segment measurements, and equations have been proposed as tools for improving the diagnostic performance of the exercise test. Objective: To compare the diagnostic utility of these scores, measurements, and equations with that of visual ST- segment measurements in patients with reduced workup bias. Design: Prospective analysis. Setting: 12 university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Patients: 814 consecutive patients who presented with angina pectoris and agreed to undergo both exercise testing and coronary angiography. Measurements: Digital electrocardiographic recorders and angiographic calipers were used for testing at each site, and test results were sent to core laboratories. Results: Although 25% of patients had previously had testing, workup bias was reduced, as shown by comparison with a pilot study group. This reduction resulted in a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 85% for visual analysis. Computerized measurements and visual analysis had similar diagnostic power. Equations incorporating nonelectrocardiographic variables and either visual or computerized ST- segment measurement had similar discrimination and were superior to single ST-segment measurements. These equations correctly classified 5 more patients of every 100 tested (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.80 for equations and 0.68 for visual analysis; P < 0.001) in this population with a 50% prevalence of disease. Conclusions: Standard exercise tests had lower sensitivity but higher specificity in this population with reduced work-up bias than in previous studies. Computerized ST-segment measurements were similar to visual ST-segment measurements made by cardiologists. Considering more than ST-segment measurements can enhance the diagnostic power of the exercise test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0005492003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0005492003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9625682

AN - SCOPUS:0005492003

VL - 128

SP - 965

EP - 974

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 12 PART 1

ER -