The exozodiacal dust problem for direct observations of exo-earths

Aki Roberge, Christine H. Chen, Rafael Millan-Gabet, Alycia J. Weinberger, Philip M. Hinz, Karl R. Stapelfeldt, Olivier Absil, Marc J. Kuchner, Geoffrey Bryden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations


Debris dust in the habitable zones of stars-otherwise known as exozodiacal dust-comes from extrasolar asteroids and comets and is thus an expected part of a planetary system. Background flux from the solar system's zodiacal dust and the exozodiacal dust in the target system is likely to be the largest source of astrophysical noise in direct observations of terrestrial planets in the habitable zones of nearby stars. Furthermore, dust structures like clumps, thought to be produced by dynamical interactions with exoplanets, are a possible source of confusion. In this article, we qualitatively assess the primary impact of exozodiacal dust on high-contrast direct imaging at optical wavelengths, such as would be performed with a coronagraph. Then we present the sensitivity of previous, current, and near-term facilities to thermal emission from debris dust at all distances from nearby solar-type stars, as well as our current knowledge of dust levels from recent surveys. Finally, we address the other method of detecting debris dust, through high-contrast imaging in scattered light. This method is currently far less sensitive than thermal emission observations, but provides high spatial resolution for studying dust structures. This article represents the first report of NASA's Exoplanet Exploration Program Analysis Group (ExoPAG).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)799-808
Number of pages10
JournalPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Issue number918
StatePublished - Aug 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science


Dive into the research topics of 'The exozodiacal dust problem for direct observations of exo-earths'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this