The "facts" of mass extinctions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The years since Snowbird I have seen an explosive growth of research on the patterns, rates, causes, and consequences of extinction. The fossil record of evolution is better known, new stratigraphic sections have been scrutinized in great detail, and additional markers of environmental change have been discovered in the rock record. Three contrasting interpretations of the fossil record of extinction are possible: catastrophic extinction, gradual extinction, and stepwise extinction. Each interpretation is supported by some of the evidence. However flawed, the fossil record is the only record we have of natural extinction. Compilations from the primary literature provide insight on the magnitude, breadth, and periodicity of mass extinctions. Outcrop-based studies have the potential to resolve controversies over the precise rate and pattern of mass extinctions. Unfortunately, a literal reading of the fossil record is made difficult by the manner in which fossils occur in strata and by the way in which fossils are collected and studied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalSpecial Paper of the Geological Society of America
Volume247
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

mass extinction
extinction
fossil record
fossil
periodicity
explosive
environmental change
outcrop
rock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology

Cite this

The "facts" of mass extinctions. / Flessa, Karl.

In: Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 247, 1990, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5df2ef9141974242b9ce43d9c9e20743,
title = "The {"}facts{"} of mass extinctions",
abstract = "The years since Snowbird I have seen an explosive growth of research on the patterns, rates, causes, and consequences of extinction. The fossil record of evolution is better known, new stratigraphic sections have been scrutinized in great detail, and additional markers of environmental change have been discovered in the rock record. Three contrasting interpretations of the fossil record of extinction are possible: catastrophic extinction, gradual extinction, and stepwise extinction. Each interpretation is supported by some of the evidence. However flawed, the fossil record is the only record we have of natural extinction. Compilations from the primary literature provide insight on the magnitude, breadth, and periodicity of mass extinctions. Outcrop-based studies have the potential to resolve controversies over the precise rate and pattern of mass extinctions. Unfortunately, a literal reading of the fossil record is made difficult by the manner in which fossils occur in strata and by the way in which fossils are collected and studied.",
author = "Karl Flessa",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1130/SPE247-p1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "247",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Special Paper of the Geological Society of America",
issn = "0072-1077",
publisher = "Geological Society of America",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "facts" of mass extinctions

AU - Flessa, Karl

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The years since Snowbird I have seen an explosive growth of research on the patterns, rates, causes, and consequences of extinction. The fossil record of evolution is better known, new stratigraphic sections have been scrutinized in great detail, and additional markers of environmental change have been discovered in the rock record. Three contrasting interpretations of the fossil record of extinction are possible: catastrophic extinction, gradual extinction, and stepwise extinction. Each interpretation is supported by some of the evidence. However flawed, the fossil record is the only record we have of natural extinction. Compilations from the primary literature provide insight on the magnitude, breadth, and periodicity of mass extinctions. Outcrop-based studies have the potential to resolve controversies over the precise rate and pattern of mass extinctions. Unfortunately, a literal reading of the fossil record is made difficult by the manner in which fossils occur in strata and by the way in which fossils are collected and studied.

AB - The years since Snowbird I have seen an explosive growth of research on the patterns, rates, causes, and consequences of extinction. The fossil record of evolution is better known, new stratigraphic sections have been scrutinized in great detail, and additional markers of environmental change have been discovered in the rock record. Three contrasting interpretations of the fossil record of extinction are possible: catastrophic extinction, gradual extinction, and stepwise extinction. Each interpretation is supported by some of the evidence. However flawed, the fossil record is the only record we have of natural extinction. Compilations from the primary literature provide insight on the magnitude, breadth, and periodicity of mass extinctions. Outcrop-based studies have the potential to resolve controversies over the precise rate and pattern of mass extinctions. Unfortunately, a literal reading of the fossil record is made difficult by the manner in which fossils occur in strata and by the way in which fossils are collected and studied.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879653792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879653792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1130/SPE247-p1

DO - 10.1130/SPE247-p1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84879653792

VL - 247

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Special Paper of the Geological Society of America

JF - Special Paper of the Geological Society of America

SN - 0072-1077

ER -