The gender of rhetoric, reason, and realism

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter argues that moving beyond realism- to post-realism-requires moving beyond the gender-blindness of conventional accounts.1 My argument weaves together areas of inquiry that are usually treated in isolation. Intellectual developments associated with the rise of systematic inquiry in ancient Greece-marked by the shift from rhetoric to philosophy and its foundational dichotomies of reason over affect, mind over body-comprise one area of inquiry. Another is the study of historical-political developments-the shift to centralized authority and its dichotomies of public over private, civilized over "other"-within which Western science and political theory "emerged." A third area of inquiry is feminist scholarship that identifies Western philosophy and science as masculinist (privileging that which is associated with maleness over that which is associated with femaleness) and androcentric (taking male ways of being and knowing-as constituted under conditions of gender hierarchy-as the putatively human norm). A final area encompasses feminist critiques of state formation as institutionalizing and legitimating gender (and other) hierarchies and, specifically, as "naturalizing" the dichotomy of male-female "difference" that has excluded women (and others associated with the feminine) from intellectual and political power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPost-Realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations
PublisherMichigan State University Press
Pages257-275
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)9780870134616
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

realism
rhetoric
gender
blindness
political development
political theory
historical development
state formation
political power
science
Greece
social isolation
philosophy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Peterson, V. S. (2012). The gender of rhetoric, reason, and realism. In Post-Realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations (pp. 257-275). Michigan State University Press.

The gender of rhetoric, reason, and realism. / Peterson, V Spike.

Post-Realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations. Michigan State University Press, 2012. p. 257-275.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Peterson, VS 2012, The gender of rhetoric, reason, and realism. in Post-Realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations. Michigan State University Press, pp. 257-275.
Peterson VS. The gender of rhetoric, reason, and realism. In Post-Realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations. Michigan State University Press. 2012. p. 257-275
Peterson, V Spike. / The gender of rhetoric, reason, and realism. Post-Realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations. Michigan State University Press, 2012. pp. 257-275
@inbook{81693a4fe2d24a2aae0993b91ff92389,
title = "The gender of rhetoric, reason, and realism",
abstract = "This chapter argues that moving beyond realism- to post-realism-requires moving beyond the gender-blindness of conventional accounts.1 My argument weaves together areas of inquiry that are usually treated in isolation. Intellectual developments associated with the rise of systematic inquiry in ancient Greece-marked by the shift from rhetoric to philosophy and its foundational dichotomies of reason over affect, mind over body-comprise one area of inquiry. Another is the study of historical-political developments-the shift to centralized authority and its dichotomies of public over private, civilized over {"}other{"}-within which Western science and political theory {"}emerged.{"} A third area of inquiry is feminist scholarship that identifies Western philosophy and science as masculinist (privileging that which is associated with maleness over that which is associated with femaleness) and androcentric (taking male ways of being and knowing-as constituted under conditions of gender hierarchy-as the putatively human norm). A final area encompasses feminist critiques of state formation as institutionalizing and legitimating gender (and other) hierarchies and, specifically, as {"}naturalizing{"} the dichotomy of male-female {"}difference{"} that has excluded women (and others associated with the feminine) from intellectual and political power.",
author = "Peterson, {V Spike}",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780870134616",
pages = "257--275",
booktitle = "Post-Realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations",
publisher = "Michigan State University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The gender of rhetoric, reason, and realism

AU - Peterson, V Spike

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This chapter argues that moving beyond realism- to post-realism-requires moving beyond the gender-blindness of conventional accounts.1 My argument weaves together areas of inquiry that are usually treated in isolation. Intellectual developments associated with the rise of systematic inquiry in ancient Greece-marked by the shift from rhetoric to philosophy and its foundational dichotomies of reason over affect, mind over body-comprise one area of inquiry. Another is the study of historical-political developments-the shift to centralized authority and its dichotomies of public over private, civilized over "other"-within which Western science and political theory "emerged." A third area of inquiry is feminist scholarship that identifies Western philosophy and science as masculinist (privileging that which is associated with maleness over that which is associated with femaleness) and androcentric (taking male ways of being and knowing-as constituted under conditions of gender hierarchy-as the putatively human norm). A final area encompasses feminist critiques of state formation as institutionalizing and legitimating gender (and other) hierarchies and, specifically, as "naturalizing" the dichotomy of male-female "difference" that has excluded women (and others associated with the feminine) from intellectual and political power.

AB - This chapter argues that moving beyond realism- to post-realism-requires moving beyond the gender-blindness of conventional accounts.1 My argument weaves together areas of inquiry that are usually treated in isolation. Intellectual developments associated with the rise of systematic inquiry in ancient Greece-marked by the shift from rhetoric to philosophy and its foundational dichotomies of reason over affect, mind over body-comprise one area of inquiry. Another is the study of historical-political developments-the shift to centralized authority and its dichotomies of public over private, civilized over "other"-within which Western science and political theory "emerged." A third area of inquiry is feminist scholarship that identifies Western philosophy and science as masculinist (privileging that which is associated with maleness over that which is associated with femaleness) and androcentric (taking male ways of being and knowing-as constituted under conditions of gender hierarchy-as the putatively human norm). A final area encompasses feminist critiques of state formation as institutionalizing and legitimating gender (and other) hierarchies and, specifically, as "naturalizing" the dichotomy of male-female "difference" that has excluded women (and others associated with the feminine) from intellectual and political power.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901565198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901565198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84901565198

SN - 9780870134616

SP - 257

EP - 275

BT - Post-Realism: The rhetorical turn in international relations

PB - Michigan State University Press

ER -