The good and order: Does the Republic display an analogy between a science of ethics and mathematics?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In his chapter in this volume, Christopher Gill discusses three ways in which to understand the elusive relationship between ethical ideas and the mathematical terms in which Plato describes them in the Republic. According to Gill, a satisfactory explanation of this relationship should both account for Platonic texts on mathematics and ethics and avoid the twin dangers Gill calls ‘Scylla' and ‘Charybdis': on the one hand, so technical an account of the mathematical terms as to make them inapplicable to ethical matters, and on the other hand, an account of the mathematical terms as merely metaphorical, that is, as having no determinately mathematical character. (Gill's worry that in the ‘Scylla' case the mathematical ideas ‘can be applied equally to almost any ethical theory', p. 252, is misleading since the problem is one of the mathematical terms' inapplicability to ethics rather than of their overapplicability.) Avoiding Scylla and Charybdis requires, then, that the relationship between mathematical and ethical ideas be intelligible in both mathematical and ethical terms, while the ideas remain determinately mathematical or ethical. According to the first of the accounts of the ethical–mathematical relationship discussed by Gill (Myles Burnyeat's), mathematics studies in abstraction the very same structures, such as concord and unity, which make a soul and a city and the cosmos good. This is why a mathematical education is at the same time an education in value. Gill faults Burnyeat for not taking sufficient account of the fact that Plato's programme of education begins with the formation of appropriate beliefs about right or fine action, and concludes with Socratic-style dialectic about virtues and the good – discussed in these, rather than in metamathematical, terms (pp. 260–2).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic
PublisherEdinburgh University Press
Pages275-278
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)9780748631889, 9780748628117
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Mathematics
Education
Plato
Fault
Ethical Theory
Concord
Cosmos
Dialectics
Danger
Unity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Kamtekar, R. . (2006). The good and order: Does the Republic display an analogy between a science of ethics and mathematics? In Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic (pp. 275-278). Edinburgh University Press.

The good and order : Does the Republic display an analogy between a science of ethics and mathematics? / Kamtekar, Rachana -.

Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. Edinburgh University Press, 2006. p. 275-278.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kamtekar, R 2006, The good and order: Does the Republic display an analogy between a science of ethics and mathematics? in Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 275-278.
Kamtekar R. The good and order: Does the Republic display an analogy between a science of ethics and mathematics? In Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. Edinburgh University Press. 2006. p. 275-278
Kamtekar, Rachana -. / The good and order : Does the Republic display an analogy between a science of ethics and mathematics?. Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. Edinburgh University Press, 2006. pp. 275-278
@inbook{c0b9925e5c9246118ee432f0c2c866fe,
title = "The good and order: Does the Republic display an analogy between a science of ethics and mathematics?",
abstract = "In his chapter in this volume, Christopher Gill discusses three ways in which to understand the elusive relationship between ethical ideas and the mathematical terms in which Plato describes them in the Republic. According to Gill, a satisfactory explanation of this relationship should both account for Platonic texts on mathematics and ethics and avoid the twin dangers Gill calls ‘Scylla' and ‘Charybdis': on the one hand, so technical an account of the mathematical terms as to make them inapplicable to ethical matters, and on the other hand, an account of the mathematical terms as merely metaphorical, that is, as having no determinately mathematical character. (Gill's worry that in the ‘Scylla' case the mathematical ideas ‘can be applied equally to almost any ethical theory', p. 252, is misleading since the problem is one of the mathematical terms' inapplicability to ethics rather than of their overapplicability.) Avoiding Scylla and Charybdis requires, then, that the relationship between mathematical and ethical ideas be intelligible in both mathematical and ethical terms, while the ideas remain determinately mathematical or ethical. According to the first of the accounts of the ethical–mathematical relationship discussed by Gill (Myles Burnyeat's), mathematics studies in abstraction the very same structures, such as concord and unity, which make a soul and a city and the cosmos good. This is why a mathematical education is at the same time an education in value. Gill faults Burnyeat for not taking sufficient account of the fact that Plato's programme of education begins with the formation of appropriate beliefs about right or fine action, and concludes with Socratic-style dialectic about virtues and the good – discussed in these, rather than in metamathematical, terms (pp. 260–2).",
author = "Kamtekar, {Rachana -}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780748631889",
pages = "275--278",
booktitle = "Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The good and order

T2 - Does the Republic display an analogy between a science of ethics and mathematics?

AU - Kamtekar, Rachana -

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - In his chapter in this volume, Christopher Gill discusses three ways in which to understand the elusive relationship between ethical ideas and the mathematical terms in which Plato describes them in the Republic. According to Gill, a satisfactory explanation of this relationship should both account for Platonic texts on mathematics and ethics and avoid the twin dangers Gill calls ‘Scylla' and ‘Charybdis': on the one hand, so technical an account of the mathematical terms as to make them inapplicable to ethical matters, and on the other hand, an account of the mathematical terms as merely metaphorical, that is, as having no determinately mathematical character. (Gill's worry that in the ‘Scylla' case the mathematical ideas ‘can be applied equally to almost any ethical theory', p. 252, is misleading since the problem is one of the mathematical terms' inapplicability to ethics rather than of their overapplicability.) Avoiding Scylla and Charybdis requires, then, that the relationship between mathematical and ethical ideas be intelligible in both mathematical and ethical terms, while the ideas remain determinately mathematical or ethical. According to the first of the accounts of the ethical–mathematical relationship discussed by Gill (Myles Burnyeat's), mathematics studies in abstraction the very same structures, such as concord and unity, which make a soul and a city and the cosmos good. This is why a mathematical education is at the same time an education in value. Gill faults Burnyeat for not taking sufficient account of the fact that Plato's programme of education begins with the formation of appropriate beliefs about right or fine action, and concludes with Socratic-style dialectic about virtues and the good – discussed in these, rather than in metamathematical, terms (pp. 260–2).

AB - In his chapter in this volume, Christopher Gill discusses three ways in which to understand the elusive relationship between ethical ideas and the mathematical terms in which Plato describes them in the Republic. According to Gill, a satisfactory explanation of this relationship should both account for Platonic texts on mathematics and ethics and avoid the twin dangers Gill calls ‘Scylla' and ‘Charybdis': on the one hand, so technical an account of the mathematical terms as to make them inapplicable to ethical matters, and on the other hand, an account of the mathematical terms as merely metaphorical, that is, as having no determinately mathematical character. (Gill's worry that in the ‘Scylla' case the mathematical ideas ‘can be applied equally to almost any ethical theory', p. 252, is misleading since the problem is one of the mathematical terms' inapplicability to ethics rather than of their overapplicability.) Avoiding Scylla and Charybdis requires, then, that the relationship between mathematical and ethical ideas be intelligible in both mathematical and ethical terms, while the ideas remain determinately mathematical or ethical. According to the first of the accounts of the ethical–mathematical relationship discussed by Gill (Myles Burnyeat's), mathematics studies in abstraction the very same structures, such as concord and unity, which make a soul and a city and the cosmos good. This is why a mathematical education is at the same time an education in value. Gill faults Burnyeat for not taking sufficient account of the fact that Plato's programme of education begins with the formation of appropriate beliefs about right or fine action, and concludes with Socratic-style dialectic about virtues and the good – discussed in these, rather than in metamathematical, terms (pp. 260–2).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924119689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924119689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84924119689

SN - 9780748631889

SN - 9780748628117

SP - 275

EP - 278

BT - Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic

PB - Edinburgh University Press

ER -