The higher education we choose, collectively: Reembodying and repoliticizing choice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reviewing three key areas of literature in our field (college choice, state policy, and faculty) the article identifies gaps that we can fill by reembodying and repoliticizing "choice," by which is meant moving beyond the individualized and "neutral" market logic in addressing the actions of collective entities in relation to politically charged policy issues, which we largely overlook. In calling our field to focus more on the "the higher education we choose," the article suggests reframing the prevailing premises of key public policy debates. It also suggests rethinking and recognizing the role that in our applied field we collectively play, in research and practice, in reconstructing academe. Underlying my centering of the "collective" throughout, is a call to recenter higher education’s social value and societal benefits in the higher education we choose, collectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)918-930
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Higher Education
Volume85
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

Fingerprint

education
public policy
market
Values
literature

Keywords

  • Class stratification
  • Colleges’ choices
  • Race
  • Racism
  • State policy
  • Unions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The higher education we choose, collectively : Reembodying and repoliticizing choice. / Rhoades, Gary D.

In: Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 85, No. 6, 01.11.2014, p. 918-930.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{33770afdc0fb48db89cfb2aa687f982b,
title = "The higher education we choose, collectively: Reembodying and repoliticizing choice",
abstract = "Reviewing three key areas of literature in our field (college choice, state policy, and faculty) the article identifies gaps that we can fill by reembodying and repoliticizing {"}choice,{"} by which is meant moving beyond the individualized and {"}neutral{"} market logic in addressing the actions of collective entities in relation to politically charged policy issues, which we largely overlook. In calling our field to focus more on the {"}the higher education we choose,{"} the article suggests reframing the prevailing premises of key public policy debates. It also suggests rethinking and recognizing the role that in our applied field we collectively play, in research and practice, in reconstructing academe. Underlying my centering of the {"}collective{"} throughout, is a call to recenter higher education’s social value and societal benefits in the higher education we choose, collectively.",
keywords = "Class stratification, Colleges’ choices, Race, Racism, State policy, Unions",
author = "Rhoades, {Gary D}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/jhe.2014.0035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "918--930",
journal = "Journal of Higher Education",
issn = "0022-1546",
publisher = "Ohio State University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The higher education we choose, collectively

T2 - Reembodying and repoliticizing choice

AU - Rhoades, Gary D

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Reviewing three key areas of literature in our field (college choice, state policy, and faculty) the article identifies gaps that we can fill by reembodying and repoliticizing "choice," by which is meant moving beyond the individualized and "neutral" market logic in addressing the actions of collective entities in relation to politically charged policy issues, which we largely overlook. In calling our field to focus more on the "the higher education we choose," the article suggests reframing the prevailing premises of key public policy debates. It also suggests rethinking and recognizing the role that in our applied field we collectively play, in research and practice, in reconstructing academe. Underlying my centering of the "collective" throughout, is a call to recenter higher education’s social value and societal benefits in the higher education we choose, collectively.

AB - Reviewing three key areas of literature in our field (college choice, state policy, and faculty) the article identifies gaps that we can fill by reembodying and repoliticizing "choice," by which is meant moving beyond the individualized and "neutral" market logic in addressing the actions of collective entities in relation to politically charged policy issues, which we largely overlook. In calling our field to focus more on the "the higher education we choose," the article suggests reframing the prevailing premises of key public policy debates. It also suggests rethinking and recognizing the role that in our applied field we collectively play, in research and practice, in reconstructing academe. Underlying my centering of the "collective" throughout, is a call to recenter higher education’s social value and societal benefits in the higher education we choose, collectively.

KW - Class stratification

KW - Colleges’ choices

KW - Race

KW - Racism

KW - State policy

KW - Unions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908477375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908477375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/jhe.2014.0035

DO - 10.1353/jhe.2014.0035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908477375

VL - 85

SP - 918

EP - 930

JO - Journal of Higher Education

JF - Journal of Higher Education

SN - 0022-1546

IS - 6

ER -