The Impact of a Soiled Airway on Intubation Success in the Emergency Department When Using the GlideScope or the Direct Laryngoscope

John C. Sakles, G. Judson Corn, Patrick Hollinger, Brittany Arcaris, Asad E Patanwala, Jarrod M. Mosier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The objective was to determine the impact of a soiled airway on firstpass success when using the GlideScope video laryngoscope or the direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016. Patients ≥ 18 years of age, who underwent rapid sequence intubation by an emergency medicine resident with the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope, were included in the analysis. Data were stratified by device used (GlideScope or direct laryngoscope). The primary outcome was firstpass success. Patients were categorized as those without blood or vomitus (CLEAN) and those with blood or vomitus (SOILED) in their airway. Multivariate regression models were developed to control for confounders. Results: When using the GlideScope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (249/306; 81.4%) than the in CLEAN group (586/644, 91.0%; difference = 9.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7%-14.5%). Similarly, when using the direct laryngoscope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (186/284, 65.5%) than in the CLEAN group (569/751, 75.8%; difference = 10.3%; 95% CI = 4.0%-16.6%). The SOILED airway was associated with a decreased firstpass success in both the GlideScope cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.3-0.7) and the direct laryngoscope cohort (aOR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.5-0.8). Conclusion: Soiling of the airway was associated with a reduced firstpass success during emergency intubation, and this reduction occurred to a similar degree whether using either the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Laryngoscopes
Intubation
Hospital Emergency Service
Confidence Intervals
Odds Ratio
Emergency Medicine
Emergencies
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The Impact of a Soiled Airway on Intubation Success in the Emergency Department When Using the GlideScope or the Direct Laryngoscope. / Sakles, John C.; Corn, G. Judson; Hollinger, Patrick; Arcaris, Brittany; Patanwala, Asad E; Mosier, Jarrod M.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9c8e80246da4127929b13730d1d7a1a,
title = "The Impact of a Soiled Airway on Intubation Success in the Emergency Department When Using the GlideScope or the Direct Laryngoscope",
abstract = "Background: The objective was to determine the impact of a soiled airway on firstpass success when using the GlideScope video laryngoscope or the direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016. Patients ≥ 18 years of age, who underwent rapid sequence intubation by an emergency medicine resident with the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope, were included in the analysis. Data were stratified by device used (GlideScope or direct laryngoscope). The primary outcome was firstpass success. Patients were categorized as those without blood or vomitus (CLEAN) and those with blood or vomitus (SOILED) in their airway. Multivariate regression models were developed to control for confounders. Results: When using the GlideScope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (249/306; 81.4{\%}) than the in CLEAN group (586/644, 91.0{\%}; difference = 9.6{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 4.7{\%}-14.5{\%}). Similarly, when using the direct laryngoscope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (186/284, 65.5{\%}) than in the CLEAN group (569/751, 75.8{\%}; difference = 10.3{\%}; 95{\%} CI = 4.0{\%}-16.6{\%}). The SOILED airway was associated with a decreased firstpass success in both the GlideScope cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.4; 95{\%} CI = 0.3-0.7) and the direct laryngoscope cohort (aOR = 0.6; 95{\%} CI = 0.5-0.8). Conclusion: Soiling of the airway was associated with a reduced firstpass success during emergency intubation, and this reduction occurred to a similar degree whether using either the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope.",
author = "Sakles, {John C.} and Corn, {G. Judson} and Patrick Hollinger and Brittany Arcaris and Patanwala, {Asad E} and Mosier, {Jarrod M.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/acem.13160",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impact of a Soiled Airway on Intubation Success in the Emergency Department When Using the GlideScope or the Direct Laryngoscope

AU - Sakles, John C.

AU - Corn, G. Judson

AU - Hollinger, Patrick

AU - Arcaris, Brittany

AU - Patanwala, Asad E

AU - Mosier, Jarrod M.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: The objective was to determine the impact of a soiled airway on firstpass success when using the GlideScope video laryngoscope or the direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016. Patients ≥ 18 years of age, who underwent rapid sequence intubation by an emergency medicine resident with the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope, were included in the analysis. Data were stratified by device used (GlideScope or direct laryngoscope). The primary outcome was firstpass success. Patients were categorized as those without blood or vomitus (CLEAN) and those with blood or vomitus (SOILED) in their airway. Multivariate regression models were developed to control for confounders. Results: When using the GlideScope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (249/306; 81.4%) than the in CLEAN group (586/644, 91.0%; difference = 9.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7%-14.5%). Similarly, when using the direct laryngoscope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (186/284, 65.5%) than in the CLEAN group (569/751, 75.8%; difference = 10.3%; 95% CI = 4.0%-16.6%). The SOILED airway was associated with a decreased firstpass success in both the GlideScope cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.3-0.7) and the direct laryngoscope cohort (aOR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.5-0.8). Conclusion: Soiling of the airway was associated with a reduced firstpass success during emergency intubation, and this reduction occurred to a similar degree whether using either the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope.

AB - Background: The objective was to determine the impact of a soiled airway on firstpass success when using the GlideScope video laryngoscope or the direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED from July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2016. Patients ≥ 18 years of age, who underwent rapid sequence intubation by an emergency medicine resident with the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope, were included in the analysis. Data were stratified by device used (GlideScope or direct laryngoscope). The primary outcome was firstpass success. Patients were categorized as those without blood or vomitus (CLEAN) and those with blood or vomitus (SOILED) in their airway. Multivariate regression models were developed to control for confounders. Results: When using the GlideScope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (249/306; 81.4%) than the in CLEAN group (586/644, 91.0%; difference = 9.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7%-14.5%). Similarly, when using the direct laryngoscope, the firstpass success was lower in the SOILED group (186/284, 65.5%) than in the CLEAN group (569/751, 75.8%; difference = 10.3%; 95% CI = 4.0%-16.6%). The SOILED airway was associated with a decreased firstpass success in both the GlideScope cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.3-0.7) and the direct laryngoscope cohort (aOR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.5-0.8). Conclusion: Soiling of the airway was associated with a reduced firstpass success during emergency intubation, and this reduction occurred to a similar degree whether using either the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015384588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015384588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acem.13160

DO - 10.1111/acem.13160

M3 - Article

C2 - 28109012

AN - SCOPUS:85015384588

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

ER -