The impact of genome-wide association studies on biomedical research publications

Travis J. Struck, Brian K. Mannakee, Ryan N Gutenkunst

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The past decade has seen major investment in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Among the many goals of GWAS, a major one is to identify and motivate research on novel genes involved in complex human disease. To assess whether this goal is being met, we quantified the effect of GWAS on the overall distribution of biomedical research publications and on the subsequent publication history of genes newly associated with complex disease. We found that the historical skew of publications toward genes involved in Mendelian disease has not changed since the advent of GWAS. Genes newly implicated by GWAS in complex disease do experience additional publications compared to control genes, and they are more likely to become exceptionally studied. But the magnitude of both effects has declined over the past decade. Our results suggest that reforms to encourage follow-up studies may be needed for GWAS to most successfully guide biomedical research toward the molecular mechanisms underlying complex human disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalHuman Genomics
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 2018

Fingerprint

Genome-Wide Association Study
Publications
Biomedical Research
Genes
Research

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Follow-up research
  • Genome-wide association studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Drug Discovery

Cite this

The impact of genome-wide association studies on biomedical research publications. / Struck, Travis J.; Mannakee, Brian K.; Gutenkunst, Ryan N.

In: Human Genomics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 13.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

@article{431a7eda46c74daaa88fec107946df88,
title = "The impact of genome-wide association studies on biomedical research publications",
abstract = "The past decade has seen major investment in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Among the many goals of GWAS, a major one is to identify and motivate research on novel genes involved in complex human disease. To assess whether this goal is being met, we quantified the effect of GWAS on the overall distribution of biomedical research publications and on the subsequent publication history of genes newly associated with complex disease. We found that the historical skew of publications toward genes involved in Mendelian disease has not changed since the advent of GWAS. Genes newly implicated by GWAS in complex disease do experience additional publications compared to control genes, and they are more likely to become exceptionally studied. But the magnitude of both effects has declined over the past decade. Our results suggest that reforms to encourage follow-up studies may be needed for GWAS to most successfully guide biomedical research toward the molecular mechanisms underlying complex human disease.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, Follow-up research, Genome-wide association studies",
author = "Struck, {Travis J.} and Mannakee, {Brian K.} and Gutenkunst, {Ryan N}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1186/s40246-018-0172-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Human Genomics",
issn = "1473-9542",
publisher = "Henry Stewart Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of genome-wide association studies on biomedical research publications

AU - Struck, Travis J.

AU - Mannakee, Brian K.

AU - Gutenkunst, Ryan N

PY - 2018/8/13

Y1 - 2018/8/13

N2 - The past decade has seen major investment in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Among the many goals of GWAS, a major one is to identify and motivate research on novel genes involved in complex human disease. To assess whether this goal is being met, we quantified the effect of GWAS on the overall distribution of biomedical research publications and on the subsequent publication history of genes newly associated with complex disease. We found that the historical skew of publications toward genes involved in Mendelian disease has not changed since the advent of GWAS. Genes newly implicated by GWAS in complex disease do experience additional publications compared to control genes, and they are more likely to become exceptionally studied. But the magnitude of both effects has declined over the past decade. Our results suggest that reforms to encourage follow-up studies may be needed for GWAS to most successfully guide biomedical research toward the molecular mechanisms underlying complex human disease.

AB - The past decade has seen major investment in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Among the many goals of GWAS, a major one is to identify and motivate research on novel genes involved in complex human disease. To assess whether this goal is being met, we quantified the effect of GWAS on the overall distribution of biomedical research publications and on the subsequent publication history of genes newly associated with complex disease. We found that the historical skew of publications toward genes involved in Mendelian disease has not changed since the advent of GWAS. Genes newly implicated by GWAS in complex disease do experience additional publications compared to control genes, and they are more likely to become exceptionally studied. But the magnitude of both effects has declined over the past decade. Our results suggest that reforms to encourage follow-up studies may be needed for GWAS to most successfully guide biomedical research toward the molecular mechanisms underlying complex human disease.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - Follow-up research

KW - Genome-wide association studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055617789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055617789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40246-018-0172-4

DO - 10.1186/s40246-018-0172-4

M3 - Letter

VL - 12

JO - Human Genomics

JF - Human Genomics

SN - 1473-9542

IS - 1

ER -