The impact of literacy on health-related quality of life measurement and outcomes in cancer outpatients

Elizabeth A. Hahn, David Cella, Deborah G. Dobrez, Barry D Weiss, Hongyan Du, Jin Shei Lai, David Victorson, Sofia F. Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Limited evidence exists regarding the relationship between literacy and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Research is needed to develop measurement techniques for low literacy populations and to evaluate potential literacy-related measurement bias. Methods: A Talking Touchscreen (TT) was developed for an HRQL study. Low (n = 214) and high literacy (n = 201) adult cancer outpatients participated, 70% of whom were from racial/ethnic minorities. Patients completed three questionnaires by TT: FACT-G (cancer-specific), SF-36 (generic health status), and a standard gamble utility questionnaire. Measurement bias was evaluated using item response theory (IRT). Effects of literacy on HRQL were evaluated using regression models. Results: Most (97%) patients rated the TT easy to use. In IRT analysis, 6/27 FACT-G and 12/31 SF-36 items demonstrated literacy bias; this was relatively balanced (10 items 'biased against' low literacy; 8 'biased against' high literacy). Mean literacy group differences were statistically and clinically non-significant for 9/14 HRQL outcomes. Adjustment for bias and/or covariates eliminated most remaining differences. Conclusions: The TT is valid and useful for HRQL assessment in low literacy populations. There appears to be no systematic literacy bias in reporting HRQL, and low literacy is not an independent risk factor for poorer HRQL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-507
Number of pages13
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Outpatients
Quality of Life
Neoplasms
Literacy
Population
Health Status
Research

Keywords

  • Literacy
  • Measurement
  • Outcomes
  • Quality of life
  • Underserved populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

The impact of literacy on health-related quality of life measurement and outcomes in cancer outpatients. / Hahn, Elizabeth A.; Cella, David; Dobrez, Deborah G.; Weiss, Barry D; Du, Hongyan; Lai, Jin Shei; Victorson, David; Garcia, Sofia F.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 04.2007, p. 495-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hahn, Elizabeth A. ; Cella, David ; Dobrez, Deborah G. ; Weiss, Barry D ; Du, Hongyan ; Lai, Jin Shei ; Victorson, David ; Garcia, Sofia F. / The impact of literacy on health-related quality of life measurement and outcomes in cancer outpatients. In: Quality of Life Research. 2007 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 495-507.
@article{8cf5346c152c429daa94a6a9c4d8d102,
title = "The impact of literacy on health-related quality of life measurement and outcomes in cancer outpatients",
abstract = "Background: Limited evidence exists regarding the relationship between literacy and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Research is needed to develop measurement techniques for low literacy populations and to evaluate potential literacy-related measurement bias. Methods: A Talking Touchscreen (TT) was developed for an HRQL study. Low (n = 214) and high literacy (n = 201) adult cancer outpatients participated, 70{\%} of whom were from racial/ethnic minorities. Patients completed three questionnaires by TT: FACT-G (cancer-specific), SF-36 (generic health status), and a standard gamble utility questionnaire. Measurement bias was evaluated using item response theory (IRT). Effects of literacy on HRQL were evaluated using regression models. Results: Most (97{\%}) patients rated the TT easy to use. In IRT analysis, 6/27 FACT-G and 12/31 SF-36 items demonstrated literacy bias; this was relatively balanced (10 items 'biased against' low literacy; 8 'biased against' high literacy). Mean literacy group differences were statistically and clinically non-significant for 9/14 HRQL outcomes. Adjustment for bias and/or covariates eliminated most remaining differences. Conclusions: The TT is valid and useful for HRQL assessment in low literacy populations. There appears to be no systematic literacy bias in reporting HRQL, and low literacy is not an independent risk factor for poorer HRQL.",
keywords = "Literacy, Measurement, Outcomes, Quality of life, Underserved populations",
author = "Hahn, {Elizabeth A.} and David Cella and Dobrez, {Deborah G.} and Weiss, {Barry D} and Hongyan Du and Lai, {Jin Shei} and David Victorson and Garcia, {Sofia F.}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-006-9128-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "495--507",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of literacy on health-related quality of life measurement and outcomes in cancer outpatients

AU - Hahn, Elizabeth A.

AU - Cella, David

AU - Dobrez, Deborah G.

AU - Weiss, Barry D

AU - Du, Hongyan

AU - Lai, Jin Shei

AU - Victorson, David

AU - Garcia, Sofia F.

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Background: Limited evidence exists regarding the relationship between literacy and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Research is needed to develop measurement techniques for low literacy populations and to evaluate potential literacy-related measurement bias. Methods: A Talking Touchscreen (TT) was developed for an HRQL study. Low (n = 214) and high literacy (n = 201) adult cancer outpatients participated, 70% of whom were from racial/ethnic minorities. Patients completed three questionnaires by TT: FACT-G (cancer-specific), SF-36 (generic health status), and a standard gamble utility questionnaire. Measurement bias was evaluated using item response theory (IRT). Effects of literacy on HRQL were evaluated using regression models. Results: Most (97%) patients rated the TT easy to use. In IRT analysis, 6/27 FACT-G and 12/31 SF-36 items demonstrated literacy bias; this was relatively balanced (10 items 'biased against' low literacy; 8 'biased against' high literacy). Mean literacy group differences were statistically and clinically non-significant for 9/14 HRQL outcomes. Adjustment for bias and/or covariates eliminated most remaining differences. Conclusions: The TT is valid and useful for HRQL assessment in low literacy populations. There appears to be no systematic literacy bias in reporting HRQL, and low literacy is not an independent risk factor for poorer HRQL.

AB - Background: Limited evidence exists regarding the relationship between literacy and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Research is needed to develop measurement techniques for low literacy populations and to evaluate potential literacy-related measurement bias. Methods: A Talking Touchscreen (TT) was developed for an HRQL study. Low (n = 214) and high literacy (n = 201) adult cancer outpatients participated, 70% of whom were from racial/ethnic minorities. Patients completed three questionnaires by TT: FACT-G (cancer-specific), SF-36 (generic health status), and a standard gamble utility questionnaire. Measurement bias was evaluated using item response theory (IRT). Effects of literacy on HRQL were evaluated using regression models. Results: Most (97%) patients rated the TT easy to use. In IRT analysis, 6/27 FACT-G and 12/31 SF-36 items demonstrated literacy bias; this was relatively balanced (10 items 'biased against' low literacy; 8 'biased against' high literacy). Mean literacy group differences were statistically and clinically non-significant for 9/14 HRQL outcomes. Adjustment for bias and/or covariates eliminated most remaining differences. Conclusions: The TT is valid and useful for HRQL assessment in low literacy populations. There appears to be no systematic literacy bias in reporting HRQL, and low literacy is not an independent risk factor for poorer HRQL.

KW - Literacy

KW - Measurement

KW - Outcomes

KW - Quality of life

KW - Underserved populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847672363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847672363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-006-9128-6

DO - 10.1007/s11136-006-9128-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 17091362

AN - SCOPUS:33847672363

VL - 16

SP - 495

EP - 507

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 3

ER -