The impact of process structure on novice, virtual collaborative writing teams

Paul Benjamin Lowry, Jay F Nunamaker, Aaron Curtis, Michelle René Lowry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Asynchronous-distributed (AD) collaborative writing (CW) is an important form of the growing trend of distributed work. However, AD CW typically results in multiple process losses. We argue that using advanced writing technologies designed for AD work alone is not sufficient by itself to overcome these losses. Instead, adopting high levels of process structure delivered in the form of explicitly written procedural scripts can improve the results of AD CW groups. We performed an experiment with over 500 participants working in groups supported by advanced CW technologies that were designed for AD work. Participants were given six weeks to conduct their work. We found that high levels of process structure in novice AD CW groups that worked on a moderately complex task created significantly better outcomes than did groups using low levels of process structure. Groups with high levels of process structure had better results in terms of production, document quality, satisfaction, relationships, and communication. In no case did low-structure groups outperform high-structure groups. This research supports our hypothesis that increased process structure delivered in the form of a repeatable process script can decrease process losses and increase process gains in novice AD CW groups. We conclude that it is not sufficient to give novice AD writing groups CW technology and time to conduct their tasks; these groups also need appropriate procedural support, which can be provided effectively through written scripts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-364
Number of pages24
JournalIEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Communication
Collaborative writing
Experiments
Distributed work
Relationship satisfaction
Experiment

Keywords

  • Asynchronous-distributed (AD) work
  • Collaboration
  • Collaborative writing (CW)
  • Distributed group work
  • Internet-based work
  • Process structure
  • Self-sustaining groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The impact of process structure on novice, virtual collaborative writing teams. / Lowry, Paul Benjamin; Nunamaker, Jay F; Curtis, Aaron; Lowry, Michelle René.

In: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 48, No. 4, 12.2005, p. 341-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lowry, Paul Benjamin ; Nunamaker, Jay F ; Curtis, Aaron ; Lowry, Michelle René. / The impact of process structure on novice, virtual collaborative writing teams. In: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 2005 ; Vol. 48, No. 4. pp. 341-364.
@article{ad4ca22a812e4a0c90bd73ebed168d19,
title = "The impact of process structure on novice, virtual collaborative writing teams",
abstract = "Asynchronous-distributed (AD) collaborative writing (CW) is an important form of the growing trend of distributed work. However, AD CW typically results in multiple process losses. We argue that using advanced writing technologies designed for AD work alone is not sufficient by itself to overcome these losses. Instead, adopting high levels of process structure delivered in the form of explicitly written procedural scripts can improve the results of AD CW groups. We performed an experiment with over 500 participants working in groups supported by advanced CW technologies that were designed for AD work. Participants were given six weeks to conduct their work. We found that high levels of process structure in novice AD CW groups that worked on a moderately complex task created significantly better outcomes than did groups using low levels of process structure. Groups with high levels of process structure had better results in terms of production, document quality, satisfaction, relationships, and communication. In no case did low-structure groups outperform high-structure groups. This research supports our hypothesis that increased process structure delivered in the form of a repeatable process script can decrease process losses and increase process gains in novice AD CW groups. We conclude that it is not sufficient to give novice AD writing groups CW technology and time to conduct their tasks; these groups also need appropriate procedural support, which can be provided effectively through written scripts.",
keywords = "Asynchronous-distributed (AD) work, Collaboration, Collaborative writing (CW), Distributed group work, Internet-based work, Process structure, Self-sustaining groups",
author = "Lowry, {Paul Benjamin} and Nunamaker, {Jay F} and Aaron Curtis and Lowry, {Michelle Ren{\'e}}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1109/TPC.2005.859728",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "341--364",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication",
issn = "0099-9474",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of process structure on novice, virtual collaborative writing teams

AU - Lowry, Paul Benjamin

AU - Nunamaker, Jay F

AU - Curtis, Aaron

AU - Lowry, Michelle René

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Asynchronous-distributed (AD) collaborative writing (CW) is an important form of the growing trend of distributed work. However, AD CW typically results in multiple process losses. We argue that using advanced writing technologies designed for AD work alone is not sufficient by itself to overcome these losses. Instead, adopting high levels of process structure delivered in the form of explicitly written procedural scripts can improve the results of AD CW groups. We performed an experiment with over 500 participants working in groups supported by advanced CW technologies that were designed for AD work. Participants were given six weeks to conduct their work. We found that high levels of process structure in novice AD CW groups that worked on a moderately complex task created significantly better outcomes than did groups using low levels of process structure. Groups with high levels of process structure had better results in terms of production, document quality, satisfaction, relationships, and communication. In no case did low-structure groups outperform high-structure groups. This research supports our hypothesis that increased process structure delivered in the form of a repeatable process script can decrease process losses and increase process gains in novice AD CW groups. We conclude that it is not sufficient to give novice AD writing groups CW technology and time to conduct their tasks; these groups also need appropriate procedural support, which can be provided effectively through written scripts.

AB - Asynchronous-distributed (AD) collaborative writing (CW) is an important form of the growing trend of distributed work. However, AD CW typically results in multiple process losses. We argue that using advanced writing technologies designed for AD work alone is not sufficient by itself to overcome these losses. Instead, adopting high levels of process structure delivered in the form of explicitly written procedural scripts can improve the results of AD CW groups. We performed an experiment with over 500 participants working in groups supported by advanced CW technologies that were designed for AD work. Participants were given six weeks to conduct their work. We found that high levels of process structure in novice AD CW groups that worked on a moderately complex task created significantly better outcomes than did groups using low levels of process structure. Groups with high levels of process structure had better results in terms of production, document quality, satisfaction, relationships, and communication. In no case did low-structure groups outperform high-structure groups. This research supports our hypothesis that increased process structure delivered in the form of a repeatable process script can decrease process losses and increase process gains in novice AD CW groups. We conclude that it is not sufficient to give novice AD writing groups CW technology and time to conduct their tasks; these groups also need appropriate procedural support, which can be provided effectively through written scripts.

KW - Asynchronous-distributed (AD) work

KW - Collaboration

KW - Collaborative writing (CW)

KW - Distributed group work

KW - Internet-based work

KW - Process structure

KW - Self-sustaining groups

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29344473093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29344473093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TPC.2005.859728

DO - 10.1109/TPC.2005.859728

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 341

EP - 364

JO - IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

JF - IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

SN - 0099-9474

IS - 4

ER -