The Impact of the Antitobacco Norm on the Selected Mode of Cognitive Dissonance Reduction

Dimitri Voisin, Jeffrey A Stone, Maja Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments tested the hypothesis that when behavior violates an antismoking injunctive norm, dissonance is aroused, but the injunctive norm constrains how people reduce their discomfort. In Experiment 1, participants with positive or negative attitudes toward public smoking wrote an essay for or against a ban on public smoking. Whereas attitude change occurred for those whose counter-attitudinal essay supported the antismoking norm, those whose counter-attitudinal essay violated the antismoking norm did not change their attitudes to reduce dissonance. In Experiment 2, participants who wrote against the ban on public smoking eschewed attitude change in favor of reducing dissonance through trivialization and act rationalization. The discussion focuses on how maintaining social connections makes cognitions resistant to change when dissonance is aroused.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-67
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Cognitive Dissonance
Smoking
Cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The Impact of the Antitobacco Norm on the Selected Mode of Cognitive Dissonance Reduction. / Voisin, Dimitri; Stone, Jeffrey A; Becker, Maja.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 57-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5adb2749c4444b25b4eadcf990ac4586,
title = "The Impact of the Antitobacco Norm on the Selected Mode of Cognitive Dissonance Reduction",
abstract = "Two experiments tested the hypothesis that when behavior violates an antismoking injunctive norm, dissonance is aroused, but the injunctive norm constrains how people reduce their discomfort. In Experiment 1, participants with positive or negative attitudes toward public smoking wrote an essay for or against a ban on public smoking. Whereas attitude change occurred for those whose counter-attitudinal essay supported the antismoking norm, those whose counter-attitudinal essay violated the antismoking norm did not change their attitudes to reduce dissonance. In Experiment 2, participants who wrote against the ban on public smoking eschewed attitude change in favor of reducing dissonance through trivialization and act rationalization. The discussion focuses on how maintaining social connections makes cognitions resistant to change when dissonance is aroused.",
author = "Dimitri Voisin and Stone, {Jeffrey A} and Maja Becker",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00981.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "57--67",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impact of the Antitobacco Norm on the Selected Mode of Cognitive Dissonance Reduction

AU - Voisin, Dimitri

AU - Stone, Jeffrey A

AU - Becker, Maja

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Two experiments tested the hypothesis that when behavior violates an antismoking injunctive norm, dissonance is aroused, but the injunctive norm constrains how people reduce their discomfort. In Experiment 1, participants with positive or negative attitudes toward public smoking wrote an essay for or against a ban on public smoking. Whereas attitude change occurred for those whose counter-attitudinal essay supported the antismoking norm, those whose counter-attitudinal essay violated the antismoking norm did not change their attitudes to reduce dissonance. In Experiment 2, participants who wrote against the ban on public smoking eschewed attitude change in favor of reducing dissonance through trivialization and act rationalization. The discussion focuses on how maintaining social connections makes cognitions resistant to change when dissonance is aroused.

AB - Two experiments tested the hypothesis that when behavior violates an antismoking injunctive norm, dissonance is aroused, but the injunctive norm constrains how people reduce their discomfort. In Experiment 1, participants with positive or negative attitudes toward public smoking wrote an essay for or against a ban on public smoking. Whereas attitude change occurred for those whose counter-attitudinal essay supported the antismoking norm, those whose counter-attitudinal essay violated the antismoking norm did not change their attitudes to reduce dissonance. In Experiment 2, participants who wrote against the ban on public smoking eschewed attitude change in favor of reducing dissonance through trivialization and act rationalization. The discussion focuses on how maintaining social connections makes cognitions resistant to change when dissonance is aroused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872669952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872669952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00981.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00981.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872669952

VL - 43

SP - 57

EP - 67

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 1

ER -