The implications of scaling approaches for understanding resilience and reorganization in ecosystems

Andrew J. Kerkhoff, Brian Enquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Managing ecosystems for resilience - the capacity to maintain function in response to perturbation - is among the most pressing ecological and socioeconomic imperatives of our time. The variability of biological and ecological systems at multiple scales in time and space makes this task even more challenging, yet diverse ecological systems often display striking regularities. These regularities often take the form of scaling laws, which describe how the structure and function of the system change systematically with scale. In this article, we review recent work on the scaling of human settlement sizes and fertility as well as the size distributions of forests. We demonstrate that systematic departures from expected ecological scaling relationships may indicate particular structuring processes (e.g., fire) or the perturbation and reorganization of ecosystems. In sum, we argue that scaling provides a powerful tool for understanding resilience and change in ecological systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-499
Number of pages11
JournalBioScience
Volume57
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

human settlements
pressing
space and time
Ecosystem
socioeconomics
perturbation
ecosystems
ecosystem
human settlement
fertility
Fertility
ecological resilience

Keywords

  • Adaptive management
  • Allometry
  • Energetic equivalence rule
  • Forest structure
  • Human ecology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

The implications of scaling approaches for understanding resilience and reorganization in ecosystems. / Kerkhoff, Andrew J.; Enquist, Brian.

In: BioScience, Vol. 57, No. 6, 06.2007, p. 489-499.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89c9b4e549704578bd9198a0e38d836c,
title = "The implications of scaling approaches for understanding resilience and reorganization in ecosystems",
abstract = "Managing ecosystems for resilience - the capacity to maintain function in response to perturbation - is among the most pressing ecological and socioeconomic imperatives of our time. The variability of biological and ecological systems at multiple scales in time and space makes this task even more challenging, yet diverse ecological systems often display striking regularities. These regularities often take the form of scaling laws, which describe how the structure and function of the system change systematically with scale. In this article, we review recent work on the scaling of human settlement sizes and fertility as well as the size distributions of forests. We demonstrate that systematic departures from expected ecological scaling relationships may indicate particular structuring processes (e.g., fire) or the perturbation and reorganization of ecosystems. In sum, we argue that scaling provides a powerful tool for understanding resilience and change in ecological systems.",
keywords = "Adaptive management, Allometry, Energetic equivalence rule, Forest structure, Human ecology",
author = "Kerkhoff, {Andrew J.} and Brian Enquist",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1641/B570606",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "489--499",
journal = "BioScience",
issn = "0006-3568",
publisher = "American Institute of Biological Sciences",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The implications of scaling approaches for understanding resilience and reorganization in ecosystems

AU - Kerkhoff, Andrew J.

AU - Enquist, Brian

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Managing ecosystems for resilience - the capacity to maintain function in response to perturbation - is among the most pressing ecological and socioeconomic imperatives of our time. The variability of biological and ecological systems at multiple scales in time and space makes this task even more challenging, yet diverse ecological systems often display striking regularities. These regularities often take the form of scaling laws, which describe how the structure and function of the system change systematically with scale. In this article, we review recent work on the scaling of human settlement sizes and fertility as well as the size distributions of forests. We demonstrate that systematic departures from expected ecological scaling relationships may indicate particular structuring processes (e.g., fire) or the perturbation and reorganization of ecosystems. In sum, we argue that scaling provides a powerful tool for understanding resilience and change in ecological systems.

AB - Managing ecosystems for resilience - the capacity to maintain function in response to perturbation - is among the most pressing ecological and socioeconomic imperatives of our time. The variability of biological and ecological systems at multiple scales in time and space makes this task even more challenging, yet diverse ecological systems often display striking regularities. These regularities often take the form of scaling laws, which describe how the structure and function of the system change systematically with scale. In this article, we review recent work on the scaling of human settlement sizes and fertility as well as the size distributions of forests. We demonstrate that systematic departures from expected ecological scaling relationships may indicate particular structuring processes (e.g., fire) or the perturbation and reorganization of ecosystems. In sum, we argue that scaling provides a powerful tool for understanding resilience and change in ecological systems.

KW - Adaptive management

KW - Allometry

KW - Energetic equivalence rule

KW - Forest structure

KW - Human ecology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249798324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249798324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1641/B570606

DO - 10.1641/B570606

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249798324

VL - 57

SP - 489

EP - 499

JO - BioScience

JF - BioScience

SN - 0006-3568

IS - 6

ER -